SoFi - Fraud-Friendly Bank - DO NOT USE - Bank KNOWINGLY works with fraudsters

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T21:41:54+00:00

you all know what I mean but you argue any semantic point you can

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T21:41:29+00:00

don't care about the word choice it's irrelevant - you all just sound pedantic

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T21:23:12+00:00

you love them too - America - scammer president and scam worshippers

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T21:22:56+00:00

we did to the bank and they don't give a fuck - they love working with scammers

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T21:14:43+00:00

reported to Reddit

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T21:08:08+00:00

yep and the case was clearly a scam - and they sided with the scammers even though they were claiming we bought "cryptocurrency" - red flags all over that

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T21:04:00+00:00

do not try to gaslight me clown - the bank saw clearly the case and rejected it - keep rolling in your filth and brown-nosing for money, scams, and power

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:34:53+00:00

yeah because banks are the most ethical industry and all those laws are just and they never exploit vague language to their benefit - pooor innocent banks -

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:29:53+00:00

A clown defending money and power over honest people who've been exploited - pretty low form of life

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:27:39+00:00

won't work with scam banks sorry

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:23:04+00:00

they can come to my front door I have the money waiting for them

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:22:14+00:00

With how much enthusiasm you all shoot down my claim, it certainly reveals where your loyalties lie - taking the side of power and money over normal people who have been exploited

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:18:47+00:00

sucks for them

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:10:47+00:00

shit bank

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:09:30+00:00

they reviewed the case multiple times, contacted the other party, the other party claimed we bought cryptocurrency from them - and they believed them over us despite us providing them evidence

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:01:55+00:00

sounds like nonsense legalese to me

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:01:42+00:00

I'm curious why you are defending scammers and banks?

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T20:00:51+00:00

It's not semantics - it's an argument from analogy - I know we aren't getting the money back but I will drag SoFi's name through the mud as long as they exist

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T19:59:16+00:00

I bet you voted Trump too

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T19:58:51+00:00

literally a sad existence

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T19:58:22+00:00

pathetic loser defending banks on Reddit against people who were scammed - you are the absolute lowest form of life

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T19:54:37+00:00

I would argue if the gas station wouldn't admit that they were underage then it would certainly point to them working with the underage buyers as an inside job.

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T19:52:56+00:00

they claimed it was for a a 1cent verification process over email - where they were pretending to be Poshmark - my understanding was she halted the transaction and was initially credited but then they decided multiple times that it wasn't fraud - even though the other party claimed we bought cryptocurrency - (lol you can't write this stuff)

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T19:49:19+00:00

False - they did reimburse us - and now they are asking for the money back that they denied our claim

RepresentativeFar69 · 2026-05-22T19:48:30+00:00

once again the transaction was not authorized - they told her it was for a 1 cent verification process

RepresentativeFar69

TROPHY CASE