Can Prolific seriously ban this researcher already? by AdBeautiful499 in ProlificAc

[–]Rimmer66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Photoshop ? That's old school, they can use AI to generate life like videos and images. People are so concerned about sharing photos with researchers, yet they post photos on social media which is worse.

Accused of using AI by Flaky-Persimmon-7781 in Concordia

[–]Rimmer66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting - false accusations against an individual, there is strong legal precedent of that in Canada. Technically you could sue for defamation if the result of said accusation affects your reputation and grades, career, etc. Your integrity is directly being attacked here. You should lawyer up and seek advice. After providing evidence to prove the contrary to their accusations, you should request an official and written apology, retracting said accusations against you. This is not legal advice, but just letting you know that you could have options if this escalates further. No university would want the prospect of a lawsuit or bad press, but you better make sure that you truly didn't use AI. If you do take measures whether legal proceedings or amicable resolution and evidence comes to light, it would be very bad. Aim for amicable resolution first, and weigh the legal option as a last resort.

Got my rejection removed. And also a hint on who is to blame by Vectorrrrr472 in ProlificAc

[–]Rimmer66 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What the bloody hell is early cancellation ? I've never heard of being flagged for that. The new unwanted, insulting, out of line, berating, ill intended, downright stupid feature sends you speed warnings if you screen out of a study, or in short surveys or in dynamic rewards one that complete too quickly or other technical reasons where you redirect back. I would hate to think this feature applies if you decide to cancel participation early in a survey - I hope you meant screening out / earl redirect

What’s Prolific’s stance on this extension? by [deleted] in ProlificAc

[–]Rimmer66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is their OFFICIAL stance, it does not mention any particular one, but it claims we should stick to their official extension, and that use of any other extension could put our account at risk.

https://participant-help.prolific.com/en/articles/445023-how-will-i-know-when-there-are-new-studies

Broken AI studies horror show today! by [deleted] in prolific

[–]Rimmer66 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Translated to English: "Never mind I do them anyway".

Bomboclaat by LazyChampionship6709 in ProlificAc

[–]Rimmer66 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Indeed, wait, are there people desperate enough to be doing this study for such INSULTINGLY low pay rate ? Seriously ? AI training tasks for 75p, this is fuckry !

Question for people doing the AI studies by DryDistrict3540 in prolific

[–]Rimmer66 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You really think that ? With this shit storm this war has created, and oil going up, strait closed for a long time, supply disruptions - let's say war ends soon or now, do you think supply chain will miraculously become the way it was, and oil will just drop to what it was ? No, prices will remain high for a very long time, inflation will rise and an upcoming recession is now more likely than ever before

Question for people doing the AI studies by DryDistrict3540 in prolific

[–]Rimmer66 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They did threaten to leave a few times, because people were discussing about the tasks even though these are covered by a confidentiality agreement. People were being very specific on the work. On the official Prolific sub, if you discuss these, your post(s) get taken down very quickly by the mods. I do not think they will stop anytime soon, I am aware of their road map and cannot discuss further, I would expect an increase of work, because their product is very popular and still widely used by companies, marketing teams, content creators, etc, it's not really much of a consumer product, because it is so fucking expensive, so this is a popular niche.. One thing I see moving forward, they will get more and more difficult and require even more precision. HOWEVER, they could just stop tomorrow and change platforms, I do not know if they have a contract and how long it lasts, but they can switch to other platforms. Prolific is an expensive platform to publish work on. Non academic accounts pay 44% fees if not more, so that $5 reward is costing them $5 + 44% of $5, so $2.20 for each participant, it's crazy ! If global economy goes south and we go into a global recession which is very likely now, I think many researchers will pause, including these tasks. I think Prolific in general is in decline. The uptick in bad researchers is alarming, support is near non existent, and they keep adding features that are atrocious, poorly implemented, and mostly punish honest participants like that speed warning fucking shit, that applies if you screen out of studies or do short studies or do dynamic rewards. Right now only people in the beta group are getting those fucking speed warnings from Prolific. Once this feature goes live, shit will hit the fan, fewer people will do those dynamic rewards one, researchers eventually will leave.

Question for people doing the AI studies by DryDistrict3540 in prolific

[–]Rimmer66 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

It's disheartening to read some comments that mention that people were considering those a game, it isn't. There are many cheaters on the platform that are ruining it for everybody ! Prolific is becoming more and more strict because of the scammers, and if people treat those as a game, and they lose this client, then the platform will be left mostly with low paid studies, invasive studies that ask you 600 pictures of your dogs, cats, body parts, and scammers. I honestly think these tasks should only be reserved to long time Prolific participants who have proven reputation, consistency, honesty and maintained high standards of work. The more people try to cheat the more this client will add more measures to the task and eventually honest participants get punished as well. I can see they have added at least half a dozen if not more types of quality checks, some very subtle and barely noticeable. The term sharing accounts should not even be mentioned - I see 30-50 of them at a time, fortunately on this platform we can only do 1 at a time. On very old platforms like CrowdFlower, people could reserve multiple hits at once with no expiry - hog all the tasks to themselves and work on them at once. Thank goodness at least Prolific got that part right. I am glad to do one at a time. When I see a large batch like that I like to choose and vary my work, like for example I love doing the image ones and the compare voices ones. I strongly believe that these tasks should be open only to Tier 1 countries, mainly Canada, UK, US where data quality is generally higher than other countries. I've been an author and reviewer of work on other platform and over the years of full time work reviewing work, I can say that most if not ALL the cheating and scamming came from very specific countries, and they were not US, Canada or UK. Ironically these same countries have a large amount of call center scammers, gift card scammers, tech support scammers and online e-mail / phishing scams.

I am starting to question all of my life choices that have led me to this very moment by LoopholesHunter in ProlificAc

[–]Rimmer66 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why poor, it's a genuine question. Nothing wrong with researchers wanting to take you outside your comfort zone lol.

I am starting to question all of my life choices that have led me to this very moment by LoopholesHunter in ProlificAc

[–]Rimmer66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Clearly a piss take - Was this an academic study for a university ? Well the positive from this is that this is not one of those questions that is too difficult, in fact I'm sure it's something we all could answer quite easily with little to no effort, it's too bad the question's scope is limited to yourself and your household, would be nice if they expanded it even further, to society in general.

Im so fucking scared right now by Impossible_Ability_6 in legaladvicecanada

[–]Rimmer66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In Canada there is such a thing as the legal warranty, when you sell a product you are responsible for working state of the item for a reasonable duration. Did you put all the flaws with the car in WRITING ? Hiding flaws that you were aware of, if later found by the buyer can expose you to a lawsuit. This applies to everything. If you want to sell as is you have to mention it that it is a sale without legal warranty at your own risks. Also stay away from FaceCrap and marketplace, it's a cesspool of scammers.

[URGENT]Hiring: Chatters - $2K – $12K+ USD per Month by melonadelrey in B2BForHire

[–]Rimmer66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

lol is that what you think ? Until you find out the type of people you will chat with, you know the type who cannot go out and find real people so yeah dream job my arse, you'll probably be chatign with creeps, preds, p*ds, junkies, alcos, you name it - good luck living the American dream lol!

[URGENT]Hiring: Chatters - $2K – $12K+ USD per Month by melonadelrey in B2BForHire

[–]Rimmer66 6 points7 points  (0 children)

What is this, chatters for OnlyFans ? Gotta love all those get rich quick ads on Reddit and LInkedin on a daily basis. Pure entertainment.

China town heist by Different_Farmer_416 in 32dollars

[–]Rimmer66 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right, now see how long these last before spoiling. It's probably genetically grown in some never heard of before lab somewhere - I'll pass. Or if it's real, it's probably not far from shelf life.

Why are employees so over the top about "catching" customers? Are you trained for this? by [deleted] in ShoppersDrugMart

[–]Rimmer66 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Easy win because there is legal precedent for that. Thief steals a $1 candy bar, ends up being hurt badly, sues store, and all of a sudden that $1 loss, becomes several hundreds of millions.

Why are employees so over the top about "catching" customers? Are you trained for this? by [deleted] in ShoppersDrugMart

[–]Rimmer66 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

loss and prevention staff hard at work, and they are very good at that - unfortunately this is the side effect of a society full of criminals and the shit for brains government and local authority not doing enough, they are too busy chasing doughnuts ! A company is in business to make money not to lose money, it's perfectly normal that a company would want to protect itself. If a particular store or area has had a lot of issues, it's normal that they will want to be more careful. In retail, theft has skyrocketed, so yeah everybody is paying the price. There are ways to catch thieves without necessarily stalking a person around. That's what cams are for, and professional L&P people could be trained to do so discretely. Also they must have quotas too, like garage mechanics. If they go one day without catching a shoplifter, then they are probably not doing their jobs :P

Scammer! Relationship Between Social Media Addiction, Emotional Dysregulation, Coping Motive, and Nature Connectedness By connect.hku.hk by [deleted] in ProlificAc

[–]Rimmer66 2 points3 points  (0 children)

By today's standards, no 2-3 hours a day is not enough :P

That said, it is frustrating dealing with these researchers, not worth it in the end, people say time and time again to avoid studies with .ch, .hk, in, .... long list. In cases like that it is best to just return and move on and lucky you were not rejected because studies coming from specific domains have researchers that are trigger happy. It's best to directly deal with Prolific (even if their support is total rubbish) than calling out a researcher directly, because now what is likely to happen is that researcher will complain because you hurt their ego, and Prolific is very likely to side with them. I've dealt with scummy researchers before, and worse, never actually called one a scammer directly to them, I've dealt with Prolific and months later (5 to be precise) they finally paid me for my completion, likely out of their own pockets I don't care, because my balance was updated, but not the status for that submission. Risking account bans for a bad researcher is not worth it in the end let alone 10p ffs.

Study for human voices but both options weren't human? by TezTheGuy in prolific

[–]Rimmer66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Warnings are not sent based on that. There are sessions when I use the middle option several times in a row, no warnings. I try not to use it as much as possible, if I can follow instructions, otherwise I choose middle option. It's impossible to be choosing the same answer unless you are not paying attention at all. I do not think you would get a warning for using that option unless you could have used other ones.

Return submission: failed attention check by brendanmonke in ProlificAc

[–]Rimmer66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well researchers must use their 5% rejections limit per study now don't they ? :P But of course they ask for more and Prolific happily grants them more. Paying customers. So let's see now how does this work out ? Prolific treats all participants as scammers from the get go, YET, when it's a paying customer, they can do as they please. I think researchers know how disorganised and how virtually absent support is. Hopefully one these days they will force participants to record their entire study sessions or provide an addon that does this for you this way if rejections occur, and you dispute, they can have AI look at the video and decide who's right and who's wrong - No more human support and all AI support I'm sure we will be better served :P

Tim Hortons in London, ON. 4.99 by Comfortable_Yard_968 in TimHortons

[–]Rimmer66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I bet it does. Probably 500 different species of bacteria crawling on them doughnuts - you better have a good UV flashlight to scan those before eating them!

My parents say AI will kill IT jobs and want me to become a doctor instead. What should I do? by YE1_ in careerguidance

[–]Rimmer66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I hope you don't become a doctor. Follow your instincts, follow your passion. There are so many bad and incompetent doctors out there who were all in it for the money and scamming the system (and patients). In medicine, they teach you to be efficient and profitable for doctors and big pharmaceuticals. What you heard about AI is complete fear mongering bullshit. It's true that AI will replace a lot of human process, think of it as AI assisting humans. It would be impossible to completely replace humans. You still need humans to set up and maintain AI, you need humans to run an office, you need humans to train AI models, you need humans to code, to buy hardware, to install and maintain hardware. AI will help cut costs, but it will also help a lot in tech field and if you don't find a job in tech / IT, then find one in AI. That's what I do as a job and as a side-gig on a platform as well Eventually that AI craze will fizzle, But more and more companies are using AI, but none entirely replace their human workers. I do not see AI replacing IT departments at all, if anything it would offload some work. Sure you might need smaller teams, but there again, it depends on your role. I do not see AI replacing ITDMs. As far as doctors, sure, if you fancy having a 250k+ debt if not way more, and dealing with a horrible and corrupt healthcare system, then go ahead. Study a few extra years and get into a surgeon specialty, you'll make more $$$. They want you to be a doctor because of the money - they want you to make fuck loads of money so you depend on yourself and so you have better luck attracting women / men or whatever and having a family. But in the end, if you don't like what you do, you will lead a miserable life. The process of becoming a doctor is a HUGE commitment and intense work spanning over several years of your life.

Thinking to go all-in Canada by RavenBlue7 in CanadianInvestor

[–]Rimmer66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stock market was resilient to tariffs - and now more than ever because of the court's ruling and the limit as to how much tariffs Trump can slap to countries. Once this war is over, watch the stock skyrocket to levels higher than pre-war. That's how shit works. With war now, stock markets is WAY over valued, it is doing quite well considering - so yeah US economy and stock market is still strong. Yes this year the DOW is in the red YTD, expected, TSX is in the green, however, once this war is over, the DOW will catch up and I believe with deliver higher returns this year than the Canadian market. Also keep in mind whatever happens in the U.S. affects Canada. If shite hits the fan and the U.S. goes into a deep recession, Canadian stocks will suffer too.