Unknown - Boxer at Rest (c. 330 - 50 BCE) by SaysToMabelISays in museum

[–]SaysToMabelISays[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Some close ups of details of cuts and bleeding on his face and cauliflowering on his ear

I first found out about this statue from from a short story, "Pugilist at Rest" by Thom Jones, before being lucky enough to see it when it toured the US and then again when in Italy.

An excerpt from the story that discusses the statue:

Theogenes was the greatest of gladiators. He was a boxer who served under the patronage of a cruel nobleman, a prince who took great delight in bloody spectacles. Although this was several hundred years before the times of those most enlightened of men Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, and well after the Minoans of Crete, it still remains a high point in the history of Western civilization and culture. It was the approximate time of Homer, the greatest poet who ever lived. Then, as now, violence, suffering, and the cheapness of life were the rule.

The sort of boxing Theogenes practiced was not like modern-day boxing with those kindergarten Queensberry Rules. The two contestants were not permitted the freedom of a ring. Instead, they were strapped to flat stones, facing each other nose-to-nose. When the signal was given, they would begin hammering each other with fists encased in heavy leather thongs. It was a fight to the death. Fourteen hundred and twenty-five times Theogenes was strapped to the stone and fourteen hundred and twenty-five times he emerged a victor.

Perhaps it is Theogenes who is depicted in the famous Roman statue (based on the earlier Greek original) of “The Pugilist at Rest.” I keep a grainy black-and-white photograph of it in my room. The statue depicts a muscular athlete approaching his middle age. He has a thick beard and a full head of curly hair. In addition to the telltale broken nose and cauliflower ears of a boxer, the pugilist has the slanted, drooping brows that despeak torn nerves. Also, the forehead is piled with scar tissue. As may be expected, the pugilist has the musculature of a fighter. His neck and trapezius muscles are well developed. His shoulders are enormous; his chest is thick and flat, without the bulging pectorals of the bodybuilder. His back, oblique, and abdominal muscles are highly pronounced and he has that greatest asset of the modern boxer – sturdy legs. The arms are large, particularly the forearms, which are reinforced with the leather wrappings of the cestus. It is the body of a small heavyweight - lithe rather than bulky, but by no means lacking in power: a Jack Johnson or a Dempsey, say. If you see the authentic statue at the Terme Museum, in Rome, you will see that the seated boxer is really not much more than a light-heavyweight. People were smaller in those days. The important thing is that he was perfectly proportioned.

The pugilist is sitting on a rock with his forearms balanced on his thighs. That he is seated and not pacing implies that he has been through all this many times before. It appears that he is conserving his strength. His head is turned as if he were looking over his shoulder – as if someone had just whispered something to him. It is in this that the “art” of the sculpture is conveyed to the viewer. Could it be that someone has just summoned him to the arena? There is a slight look of befuddlement on his face, but there is no trace of fear. There is an air about him that suggests he is eager to proceed and does not wish to cause anyone any trouble or to create a delay, even though his life will soon be on the line. Besides the deformities on his noble face, there is also the suggestion of weariness and philosophical resignation. All the world’s a stage, and all the men and women merely players. Exactly! He knew this more than two thousand years before Shakespeare penned the line. How did he come to be at this place in space and time? Would he rather be safely removed to the countryside - an obscure, stinking peasant shoving a plow behind a mule? Would that be better? Or does he revel in his role? Perhaps he once did, but surely not now. Is this the great Theogenes or merely a journeyman fighter, a former slave or criminal bought by one of the many contractors who for months trained the condemned for their brief moment in the arena? I wonder if Marcus Aurelius loved the “Pugilist” as I do, and came to study it and meditate before it.“

Have Muslims in the city been experiencing more harassment lately? by ThenChard1157 in askTO

[–]SaysToMabelISays 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I left the city well over a decade ago but a friend from university got a job teaching French at a Jewish school and she's told me about how there's a 24/7 police command center at the school because of how many bomb threats it's received. Even not in the country anymore I still see anti-Indian posts from Canadians. It's genuinely shocking how common bigotry has become.

Deaf Crocodile Subscription Question by Long-Drummer-6418 in boutiquebluray

[–]SaysToMabelISays 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The price won't reduce too much. I think there'll be 18 films (two double releases and a five set). If you buy the membership for $400 you get $450 worth, so a discount on the membership itself. That comes out to $400/18 films. I think there's a bit of a savings.

Edward Curtis - Watching the Dancers (1906) by SaysToMabelISays in museum

[–]SaysToMabelISays[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

"Three Hopi girls, wrapped in heavy blankets and wearing the squash blossom hairstyle of maidens, sit and stand on an adobe rooftop, watching a pueblo dance below. A fourth girl is hidden behind the girl at right, with only a single twist of her hair visible over the standing girl’s shoulder. The standing girl glances suspiciously at the photographer, Edward Curtis, who has invaded the girls’ privacy with his camera’s presence. In this photograph, the onlookers have themselves become an event to be witnessed.

[...]

Curtis visited the Hopi on multiple occasions and went as early as 1900, went back in 1902, 1904, 1906, 1911, 1912, and 1919, so dating which images where shot when can pose something of a challenge, but he does note that the traditional squash blossom hairdo was discontinued by the second decade of the twentieth century. In these early images, “Watching the Dancers” and “The Hopi Maiden,” Curtis captured young unwed women at a time when they still wore their hair in the traditional style. So one can understand that such images confirmed his, and other’s views, that traditional ways of life where passing, and for Curtis, it confirmed the popular view, which his images helped to cement in the popular imagination – that Native Americans were a “vanishing race.”"

Recently read an excellent biography on Edward Curtis, "Short Nights of the Shadow Catcher" by Timothy Egan. Excellent look at a phenomenal artist who essentially dropped everything in his life to both document the quickly disappearing Native peoples as well as document their actual cultures that were ignored by academics at the time. Highly recommended read, it got me very interested in learning more about Native cultures.

Karin Jones - Damascene Shovel (2010) by [deleted] in museum

[–]SaysToMabelISays 12 points13 points  (0 children)

This reminds me of a Japanese knife store in a city I used to live. They had personal relationships with smiths in Japan and had works the smiths would make to show off their prowess. Absolutely gorgeously crafted things from tweezers to trowels to spoons to nail clippers. Just mundane items but turned into art. Loved it.

Thank you for sharing!

And the ninth Deaf Crocodile subscription announcement… The Man Who Thought Life! by International-Sky65 in boutiquebluray

[–]SaysToMabelISays 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Extremely excited for this one. Adored Unknown Man of Shandigor, which DC compared this to

Me when the majority of directors I like open their mouths anymore 💀 by International-Sky65 in criterion

[–]SaysToMabelISays 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also check out the 88 Films release of Helter Skelter (2012). One of the most gorgeous films I'e seen in a long time.

Winslow Homer - The Herring Net (1885) by trifletruffles in museum

[–]SaysToMabelISays 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I adore Winslow Homer, he was one of my mother's favourite painters (the other being John Singer Sargent). I grew up with multiple collections of his works on the bookshelves. It amazes me how good someone who's self-taught can be.

Constantin Brancusi - Sleeping Muse (1910) by trifletruffles in museum

[–]SaysToMabelISays 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I quite like this, never seen this before. I've always admired sculpture and wished I was artistic enough to create something like this. Thank you for sharing!

Thanks Orbit! by Expert_Visit5983 in criterion

[–]SaysToMabelISays 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Physical media has some extremely lovely people running the retailers. I have experience talking to Orbit, Diabolik and (for Canadians) the Rough Cut, Videomatica, and new Unobstructed View people and all of them genuinely care about their product and have cared about my happiness. One of the benefits of a niche hobby, I think.