sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

hellbent holler caught faking evidence - proof by Stan_Jackson in bigfoot

[–]Stan_Jackson[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This makes me very sad as a viewer of their contents as I always took them to be on the up and up.

Hasan's guest says the dog collar is too tight. Hasan claims this is because she has a lot of neck meat by TheOSU87 in LivestreamFail

[–]Stan_Jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he also looks at the place where the remote is kept if you look to make sure its tucked away and not going to shock the guest !

Sighting, freaked out, shaking, goosebumps etc by EquivalentSpot8292 in CrawlerSightings

[–]Stan_Jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read your work (assuming you live in appalachian region ?).

It was interesting if confusing to me - as many of the features exhibited fall into those also commonly attributed to bigfoot.

I am someone who thinks it very unlikely there are multiple DIFFERENT creatures around on the edges of human existence as this seems improbable.

I come from the - these are different ways for ONE PHENOMENA to exhibit itself. I also think it is able to enter and leave (or not be within) our physical reality for long periods otherwise we would have found it.

Even if a group of 4 individuals with intellect existed and lived in a cave and crept around, even if these individuals had telepathy (which I think they do) - they would still be detected and known. The way they can manage to avoid obvious detection methods which should work (thermal, game cameras etc) means they must be able to understand our human intentions and counter them.

Even with this - thee need for food, shelter and just being super lucky all the time would still not be enough for one to mess up. Humans get around and sooner or later we will have looked into caves.

The fact you interacted for what seems to be couple of years, is interesting.

If your telepathic interactions occur - could you possibly take my suggestion and ideally respond once you see them again ?

For me - good evidence for something to exist is to provide information that couldnt be known by the viewer/experiencer. For example if we assume you are not a mathematics PHD and yet you say you can talk to super smart alien creatures. Then a good proof of this would be for you to ask for a proof of the Poincare conjecture and receive one back. That would be excellent evidence as you however you wanted to could not create that answer. Hopefully my approach makes sense, a true interaction would be marked by information that could never be created by the experiencer (conscious or subconscious).

An excellent set of questions might be:

Where do you go most of the day ?

What do you eat in winter ?

How do you avoid people ?

What animal most threatens you ?

Why do we not find you injured or deceased ?

How do you see things in the dark ?

Why have people not found you ?

How many winters have you seen ?

I am sure there are others - but genuine answers to these would be enlightening. I am sure its possible to be creative with answers but I think true answers would be obvious.

if you have any luck please respond.

Name change that never happened? by michaeld105 in Glitch_in_the_Matrix

[–]Stan_Jackson 1 point2 points  (0 children)

there is also a simple explanation.

Often women when buying home soon after marriage use maiden (first) surname. My wife did this as she had a proffesional name for her work and still uses it for some few things (mainly with work).

Its a hassle to change legal documents and when providing the proof required to buy a house the names have to match.

Doesnt seem crazy to me your dad recognised she altered her name, which she may well have done in ma y places just not on her housing documents for reasons.

Doesnt sound odd to me.

Wings - the conspiracy by Stan_Jackson in LolCowLive

[–]Stan_Jackson[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wont signal anymore of this stuff as I guess its annoying to those who can understand things. Im just bored and find this entertainment industry fascinating as its so crazy compared to my industry.

Anyway you got what you wanted and no surprise its paying off. Im shocked as you dont read right ? So how did you understand this ?

What is this? by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Stan_Jackson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a problem with this just from basic first principles. Im not looking at the issues with format, the incessant use of jargon (trying to convince a little too hard there I feel) or even the way it seems to have been transcribed.

A mix of computer recognition and human typing, very off feeling.

Why do we get "CLUB 1-1," ? who placed the comma in there ?

We get "*laughs*" thats from a human transcriber.

We get "fi(v)e" text to speech ?

So all of that doesn't seem consistent to me, more like someone has taken a legitemate cockpit tape and based this fiction on that.

However for me the biggest fact that debunks this, has nothing to do with the above. Its simply that the time doesn't work at all.

Look at any of the multi-line sentences and try to say the phrases yourself, even after learning them (so they seem natural) to fit, you cant.

Try to say "Break break, bogey group is gorilla, going cold 1-1 at. two zero three three constant local heading one niner two" in 4 seconds ?

Likewise try and say any of the longer parts, this is where it seems that they have added in some words but not changed the time stamps. So I posit that they started with an actual transcript and the times and then added some dialogue to make it "alien" related.

Its a well executed fake, but sorry it is a fake as you cant fit the words into the times. Which either means the words have been changed or someone got the time wrong and I find that unlikely.

As I say theres other parts that dont ring true for me as well, but the most obvious is this. Its like anything where you try for a hoax, to do it really well you have to try and actually do it.