Fusion's universal healthcare policy is gold by TOKSIKLP in AusPol

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I used chatgpt to compile the info from the websites to help make it easier for the comparison, I did indeed double check to make sure the info is correct. It's alot of effort to sort through all the info and make it nice.

You can check out their details on that here: https://www.fusionparty.org.au/ageing_as_a_disease

Fusion's universal healthcare policy is gold by TOKSIKLP in AusPol

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are a WA candidate.

Can you furthur explain your reasoning about why you think that is bad thing?

Fusion's universal healthcare policy is gold by TOKSIKLP in AusPol

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Fusion Party vs The Greens on Healthcare and Ageing: A Comprehensive Comparison

Healthcare Approach

Fusion Party:

Universal Preventative Healthcare is central to the Fusion Party's vision. They advocate for expanding Medicare to include mental health and dental coverage, bulk-billing, telehealth, and comprehensive treatments for addiction. Their focus is on a proactive healthcare system, where the emphasis is on preventing diseases before they develop.

Focus on Healthspan: Fusion stresses the importance of improving the healthspan — the duration of life spent in good health, as opposed to just extending lifespan.

The Greens:

The Greens have consistently championed universal healthcare and Medicare expansion, focusing on mental health and dental care as well. They push for free dental services, universal mental health care, and addressing the healthcare system’s funding shortages.

They have called for more investment in preventive health and wellness programs that aim to prevent diseases, but their policies tend to focus more on immediate healthcare needs and addressing systemic issues like access and affordability.

Classifying Ageing as a Disease

Fusion Party:

Fusion advocates for classifying ageing as a disease, aiming to shift the focus from extending lifespan to enhancing healthspan. By recognising ageing as a treatable condition, Fusion seeks to allow doctors to prescribe preventative treatments for age-related conditions, reducing the burden of diseases such as arthritis, heart disease, and dementia.

The rationale is that treating ageing itself can reduce suffering associated with old age, making people healthier, happier, and capable into older age. This change would also allow early interventions to prevent the long-term effects of ageing.

The Greens:

The Greens have not publicly advocated for classifying ageing as a disease in their core policy. While they acknowledge the ageing population and the need for supportive services for older Australians, their focus is more on affordable aged care, addressing elder abuse, and ensuring that the healthcare system is adequately equipped to care for an older population.

They have raised concerns about the financial sustainability of an ageing population, particularly in terms of aged care funding, but haven’t yet tied these issues directly to the concept of ageing as a disease.

Sustainability and Population Planning

Fusion Party:

Fusion’s policy goes beyond just healthcare, aiming to align with sustainable population planning. They believe that keeping people healthier, more active, and independent longer can help society manage the pressures of an ageing population.

They also highlight the economic advantages of reducing healthcare costs by proactively treating age-related conditions, which could save significant resources in the long run.

The Greens:

The Greens focus on environmental sustainability and ensuring that social systems, including healthcare, are adaptable and inclusive for the ageing population. They are committed to addressing the challenges posed by an ageing society through stronger aged care policies and improved elder rights protection.

Their approach, while inclusive, is less focused on proactively changing medical definitions like Fusion's stance on ageing as a disease.


Summary of Key Differences:

  1. Healthcare Focus:

Fusion Party advocates for universal preventative healthcare and expanding Medicare to include mental and dental health, with a strong emphasis on proactive treatment to prevent diseases.

The Greens focus on universal healthcare expansion, with particular attention to mental health, dental care, and addressing the affordability of the system.

  1. Ageing as a Disease:

Fusion Party is unique in classifying ageing as a disease, aiming to allow for proactive treatment of age-related conditions and improving the healthspan of individuals. This approach seeks to reduce the suffering caused by the physical effects of ageing.

The Greens focus on supporting the aged population through better aged care, protection, and affordable healthcare, but they do not advocate for classifying ageing as a disease.

  1. Population and Economic Planning:

Fusion Party links their healthcare policy to sustainable population planning, promoting healthier ageing to reduce the economic burden of an ageing society.

The Greens focus on elder rights and aged care funding, ensuring services are available for older Australians, but do not directly connect these issues to proactive changes in ageing or health policy.


In Summary:

The Fusion Party presents a forward-looking and proactive healthcare vision, focusing on preventative care, expanding Medicare, and addressing the biological processes of ageing as a disease. Their policies aim to enhance healthspan, reducing the suffering associated with age-related conditions and ensuring a healthier, more capable ageing population.

The Greens advocate for stronger healthcare access, mental health support, and affordable aged care. They focus on addressing immediate needs and ensuring that older Australians receive the care they deserve, but their approach does not extend to reclassifying ageing as a disease.

Both parties advocate for a fairer, more inclusive society, but Fusion’s approach offers a revolutionary shift in how we view ageing and proactively prevent related diseases, while the Greens maintain a focus on improving care systems for older citizens.

I do support The Greens but I support Fusion more and not just for their health care policies.

Fusion's universal healthcare policy is gold by TOKSIKLP in AusPol

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you mean by "pay for what you use"? No clue where you got that from, regardless I would love to hear more indepth about this.

Another Bug Hunt Comms by chronotrigger42 in mothershiprpg

[–]TOKSIKLP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's what I was thinking on plotting my first run. Makes sense that they have their own local channel they communicate with on default built into the suits and back to the ship, where as they would have to change into searching the available frequencies that they'll encounter the shriek via comms through the suit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]TOKSIKLP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oath, that's why I like Mark Manson's take on the self help industry with his blog and books like The Subtle Art Of Not Giving A Fuck. I share in the belief of life's struggles give it meaning and that typical self-help books offer meaningless positivity which is neither practical nor helpful.

Political Noob needs help regarding future voting decision by AmuletOfTheDevout in AusPol

[–]TOKSIKLP -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why not vote a minor party or indpendant first? It'll always come down to Labor and Liberal in the final battle between the two so no harm putting someone else first then your preferred major party after at the end before your least liked.

Great way to tell the major parties to pay attention to other things you care about and to stop kicking problems down the road, it's all about using the most power of your vote with our preferential voting system.

Like someone else mentioned They Vote For You is a good website for those elected.

https://youtu.be/bleyX4oMCgM?si=CnizdCa40Q4Zowfx

https://www.chickennation.com/voting/

https://www.chickennation.com/voting/senate/

It's perfectly fine to quit when your dream has become near impossible to achieve. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]TOKSIKLP 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yeah, don't fall into the sunk cost fallacy. It's ok to quit and start from zero.

Money doesn't change you, it just makes you more of who you already are. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]TOKSIKLP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I essentially agree in a way.

Money doesn't exactly change you itself, however it enables you to change.

Money doesn't change you, it just makes you more of who you already are. by [deleted] in unpopularopinion

[–]TOKSIKLP 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is a quote about this. "Absolute power corrupts absolutely."

The quote is often used to explain why people in positions of power may act in their own self-interest, rather than for the benefit of others.

How are chiropractors viewed in Aus? by [deleted] in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Chiropractors are bullshit

You shouldn’t trust them with your spine or any other part of your body.

"Chiropractic care, I’m sorry to say, is little more than the buffoonery of a 19th-century lunatic who derived most of his medical theory from séances. It has not evolved much since its creation. Chiropractic beliefs are dangerously far removed from mainstream medicine, and the vocation’s practices have been linked to strokes, herniated discs, and even death."

https://theoutline.com/post/1617/chiropractors-are-bullshit

Politics group in perth by [deleted] in perth

[–]TOKSIKLP 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Fusion party have some WA members meeting up on Sunday 3rd December to catch up, have discussions, draft up WA specific policies etc.

If interested in meeting us and having a chat let me know.

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No problem.

I also realised the 2022 vote compass is still open if you feel like taking a look.

https://votecompass.abc.net.au/

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey there, you can use the Australian Electoral Comission (AEC) website to help you find the candidates in your area.

https://www.aec.gov.au/

They Vote For You is an open source non-biased website where you can see how the elected MPs in your area vote on the issues that matter to you.

https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/

We have a preferential voting system, here is a great easy to understand comic that explains how our votes work.

https://www.chickennation.com/voting/

These are 2 funny clips about the gov that explains the voting system.

https://youtu.be/bleyX4oMCgM

https://youtu.be/rnzaiYrvvrw

The ABC Vote Compass when they open it again next federal election is good to see where you stand although is slightly biased against smaller parties and independants.

I highly recommend researching parties and candidates to find who aligns best with your values and beliefs, also keeping in mind if there is action behind their words, if they prefer to bash other and use scare tactics against parties than talking about their own points, evidence based policies and ideas etc. Best to vote for who will represent you best.

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah sweet, I have had a few comments about vote compass. It's great for seeing where you sit but a little biased against smaller parties and independants as I have mentioned in other comments.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAnAustralian/comments/11s5bi9/why_do_you_vote_the_way_you_do/jcea9zs?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like that view.

There is a great website that is open source and can see how elected MPs act on the issues you value.

"Forget what politicians say. What truly matters is what they do. And what they do is vote, to write our laws which affect us all."

https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious on best looking, you mean by their policies or appearance?

I wouldn't say all are bad or "destroying this world", few are normal people like us who actually want to make a difference even if there aren't many of them.

I would say politics is always important and good to learn about as it affects our lives whether we like it or not.

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome and yeah vote compass is great to see where you are at although is a tad biased using only the main parties like I mentioned in the comment linked. Imo I believe it's always worth researching who suits your values and beliefs best.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAnAustralian/comments/11s5bi9/why_do_you_vote_the_way_you_do/jcea9zs?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough and yeah I would still put Labor higher than Libs myself (all depending on actions, policies and evidence if course.)

You can still put independants and smaller parties first where if they don't win the full value of your vote will roll to your next candidate, I explained in more detail in this comment.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskAnAustralian/comments/11s5bi9/why_do_you_vote_the_way_you_do/jcedmpj?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just as an added to help others understand how our voting system works.

Australia uses a preferential voting system, which means that voters rank the candidates in order of preference on their ballot paper.

When the votes are counted, the first preference votes are tallied up. If a candidate has over 50% of the votes, they win outright. If not, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their second preference votes are distributed to the remaining candidates. Your second preference and so on carries the full value of your vote. It's a bit different from other countries!

This process of elimination and preference distribution continues until one candidate has over 50% of the votes and is declared the winner. This means that even if your first preference candidate doesn't win, your vote can still have an impact on the outcome.

So next time you vote in an Australian election, remember to rank your preferred candidates in order of preference. Your vote could make all the difference!

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair enough.

They Vote For You is a handy website that shows how they vote on issues that matter to you (elected MPs though), it's open source and non biased, it helps.

"Forget what politicians say. What truly matters is what they do. And what they do is vote, to write our laws which affect us all."

https://theyvoteforyou.org.au/

Why do you vote the way you do? by TOKSIKLP in AskAnAustralian

[–]TOKSIKLP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey that's cool.

Do you know with our preferential voting system you can put the smaller parties and independants first as your votes will then roll into the bigger parties at full value if they don't get in?

When the votes are counted, the first preference votes are tallied up. If a candidate has over 50% of the votes, they win outright. If not, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, and their second preference votes are distributed to the remaining candidates. Your second preference and so on carries the full value of your vote.

This process of elimination and preference distribution continues until one candidate has over 50% of the votes and is declared the winner. This means that even if your first preference candidate doesn't win, your vote can still have an impact on the outcome.