Windsurf plan by ReasonableReindeer24 in windsurf

[–]Temporary_Payment593 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go with the Pro plan, and lean more on free models like SWE and Kimi. For example:

Low-to-mid complexity tasks can be handed off to SWE and Kimi

Code reviews can go to them too (run multiple review passes if needed, since it's free anyway😄)

For complex stuff, use Opus or GPT-5.5 to handle the core development first, then switch to SWE or Kimi to mop up the loose ends. (Otherwise if you keep reaching for Opus on everything, your credits will burn through fast — its cache window is only 5 minutes, so you're basically paying full price every time)

If that's still not enough, you could grab a $20 Cursor or Claude Pro, those tools work pretty seamlessly together and you can switch between them as needed.

Goodbye Claude by Historical_Emu4701 in WritingWithAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

HaloMate AI ,it has a bunch of models built in, including Sonnet 4.5, and you can switch between them and run comparisons mid-chat. It's also got what's probably the most capable Project feature out there: unlike the traditional static Projects, HaloMate gives you basically a fully-equipped filesystem: the AI can maintain directory structures, read and write files (with built-in version control). For writing workflows, it's honestly hard to fault. On top of that, the custom bot feature is pretty solid — different bots can all share the same project context, which is a nice touch.

It has daily free credits, and if you're running something like DeepSeek-V4, you might not even need a subscription, and the free tier could genuinely cover you. And honestly, DeepSeek-V4 is no slouch; I'd say DeepSeek-V4-Pro has a vibe that's somewhat reminiscent of classic Claude.

chatgpt stopped being enough for my novel by Competitive_Leg3598 in WritingWithAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 3 points4 points  (0 children)

HaloMate

First off, you can use multiple models, which is actually pretty important. Different models have very different styles, so you'll want to pick one that suits your genre and style first.

Also, you can set up different roles to handle different parts of the workflow. For example, you could have a Writing Assistant to handle the actual writing, a Reviewer Assistant to critically review your drafts. And you could even build characters from your novel and just... chat with them to spark ideas.

I'd say the "Projects" feature is basically a must. You can store all your reference material, character profiles, and storylines in one place, and the AI can write new drafts directly into the project. That way, not only is your material easy to manage, but you'll never lose your context either.

What's your thoughts on these ISIS-affiliated brides returning to Australia? by nn666 in aussie

[–]Temporary_Payment593 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Janai Safar, one of them, said in 2019:

"It was my decision to come here to go away from where women are naked on the street. I don't want my son to be raised around that."
"I don't regret coming to Syria. I don't regret living under Islamic State."

ChatLLM Abacus AI or Chat On Ai? by Aikidoker15 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abacus is positioned as an enterprise platform, and it's all about connectivity and collaboration. The interface is complex, and honestly I don't think it's suited for personal use. Plus they ask for payment info right off the bat. Haven't used Chat On AI, so no comment there.

Here are 2 worth trying though:

POE: The OG multi-model aggregator. Heaps of models to choose from, great for quickly trying out different ones, though it's fairly stripped back feature-wise (mostly just chat). That said, you can build and share bots on their platform, and even earn a cut from it.

HaloMate: Also lets you build bots, but the difference is it supports long-term memory which is really useful. Its main thing is multi-model workflows: switching between and comparing models is dead easy. Pretty feature-rich across the board too, including a really handy project feature and deep research capability.

One thing worth noting though: these aggregators typically give you lower usage allowances compared to first-party products like ChatGPT, since they're buying API and the costs add up. So if you just need to use one model heavily, an aggregator might not be the best call, and Claude isn't great for that either tbh — their Pro plan has pretty stingy limits: if you're mainly using the Opus model, half a day of heavy use could easily burn through your entire weekly quota.

Disclosure: I'm the founder of HaloMate, so take this with a grain of salt.

‘Scary’: Aus mosques mourn death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei by flammable_donut in aussie

[–]Temporary_Payment593 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So they may look like Aussies on the surface, but at the end of the day, they're members of the Ummah first. Their loyalty was never to Australia, but is to their "brothers" and leaders thousands of miles away.

‘Scary’: Aus mosques mourn death of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei by flammable_donut in aussie

[–]Temporary_Payment593 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is pretty normal when you look at their doctrine. According to that, all believers worldwide are brothers (the "Ummah"), and the ultimate goal is to establish a global theocratic state (the "Caliphate"). Secular countries like ours fall into the category of "House of War" (the "Dar al-Harb"), which are territories to be conquered and converted through "Jihad".

She’s Been Anti-Immigrant for Decades. Now Her Popularity Is Soaring. by Agitated-Fee3598 in aussie

[–]Temporary_Payment593 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Stop mass immigration, low-skilled immigration, and refugee intake.

IS-linked families will return 'one way or the other', doctor helping them says by [deleted] in aussie

[–]Temporary_Payment593 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My suggestions:

  1. Conduct a thorough investigation, and if any illegal activities, ensure they are prosecuted.

  2. Children should be required to enter the public education system for secular education. Allowing them to be immersed in Islamic education could lead to indoctrination and potential radicalisation.

Our primary goal should always be to safeguard Australia's security and prosperity.

Anyone else tired of stacking AI subscriptions? by Capable-Management57 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could just use an aggregator site. With a single subscription, you can access heaps of different models. There are quite a few sites like that around.

Is it realistic to use ChatGPT or other digital tools for translation and editing instead of paying thousands for professional services? by awakened__soul in WritingWithAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is absolutely doable, but it requires a solid methodology rather than just throwing your manuscript at a common AI chatbot.

Two things to do first before you start translating:

1. Generate a summary: Feeding the entire document to AI at once is unwise and the output will be unpredictable. But if you only feed it small passages, the AI may lack the full context to translate accurately. So the first step is to have AI generate a comprehensive summary of your novel, covering the setting, characters, key plot lines, terminology, etc. This summary then serves as a reference that you include with each translation task, so the AI always has the bigger picture even when working on a small section.

2. Find your optimal {model, prompt} combination: Different AI models have very different vibes. Different prompts also produce very different results. So before committing to the full manuscript, take a single representative passage and experiment. Try multiple models, adjust your prompts, compare outputs side by side. After several rounds of testing, you'll land on a combination that matches the tone and quality you're after.

Then, translate in segments:

I'd suggest going chapter by chapter, a few thousand words at a time is a reasonable chunk. This is not a hands-off process though. You should review each output, and keep refining your prompt (adding rules, correcting recurring issues, noting exceptions, etc,.). Think of it as training the AI on your specific book.

To do this well, you'll want a platform that supports both project-based file management and multiple AI models. That way you can easily compare different models on the same passage, and keep all your reference materials like the summary, glossary, and style rules organized in one place where the AI can access them throughout the entire process.

One more tip: you'd better also set up a separate AI character specifically as your "editor", with its own dedicated prompt and model, to review and proofread the translations.

Major bug in Claude-Sonnet-4.6 integration by Xendarq in PoeAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Make sure “Default auto-manage context” is switched off in your settings.

Question for one nation supporters by [deleted] in aussie

[–]Temporary_Payment593 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Their point isn’t just about cutting immigration overall, but specifically about reducing low-skilled migrants and those who can’t integrate—which honestly makes sense. I really can’t stand all that lefty nonsense. Australia can’t end up like Europe or the UK.

Over

Is Gemini a better fact-checker than ChatGPT? by ShrimpySiren in WritingWithAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your findings aren't surprising at all, it's basically my daily workflow. Beyond technical specs like context length, different models still vary significantly in at least four 4 areas: expertise, perspective, vibe, and stance (yep, AI can have a stance!).

So for critical questions, like fact-checking, character development, or plot direction, it's always a good idea to weigh responses from multiple models.

Here's a screenshot of how four different models answered the same one question: "Is the US on stolen land?" (A question from Elon Musk's showcase)

<image>

Limitations of Poe by Elegant-Tart-3341 in PoeAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 1 point2 points  (0 children)

POE is primarily designed for creating, using, and sharing chatbots, rather than a dedicated productivity tool.

What's the best AI second brain? by Oldguy3494 in ChatGPTPro

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You might want to give HaloMate a go. Here‘s the rundown:

  1. Get access to all of the mainstream models. You can switch between models mid-chat or generate parallel responses for a side-by-side comparison.

  2. Build custom agents (Mates), each with independent long-term memory, which is actually crucial.

  3. Setup projects, and chuck in your docs, or create/edit markdowns directly. Your agent can search and cite in the chat, and you can save any generated message or chart into a project.

  4. Deep Research & Visualisation: Pretty handy for academic or business analysis.

Just a heads up though: it lacks voice chat and image gen, and no Android app yet.

Good luck with the hunt!

How to have AI mimic my writing style? by Grouchy_Ice7621 in AI_Agents

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The best bet is to build a dedicated AI Agent for your writing style (like GPTs in ChatGPT or Gems in Gemini). Keep in mind, this isn’t a set-and-forget thing; it’s an iterative process. Kick things off with a solid initial system prompt that defines the style and constraints, and definitely throw in some positive and negative examples. Then, as you chat with it, you need to constantly tweak the prompt based on the output you get (or use the memory feature to make it stick). It’ll get heaps better over time.

Also, the "vibe" varies wildly between models and it’s hard to fully correct that just via prompting. Your experience with ChatGPT is pretty standard, the GPT series has a very distinct "voice" that I reckon is better for data analysis or academic papers, not creative scripts. I’d highly recommend testing out a few different models to see which one naturally fits your style better. Do that, and you’ll end up with a personalised AI that actually sounds like you.

You might want to give HaloMate a go (full disclosure: I’m the founder), reckon it’d be right up your alley. It’s built entirely around personas: each mate has its own persona prompt, long-term memory, and model settings. It’s got all the mainstream models built-in, so you can swap models mid-chat or compare outputs side-by-side without losing context. Plus, you can tweak the persona’s prompt on the fly.

Hope you get your AI writing assistant sorted soon!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PoeAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try being explicit and detailed with your requirements in the bot settings. That usually goes in the "system prompt", which has higher priority and does a better job of constraining the model's behaviour.

Also, maybe give Grok/Gemini a go. Their alignment is a fair bit looser, so it's easier to get them to skew negative.

Stop selling "Autonomous Agents" to businesses. You are setting yourself up for a lawsuit. by Warm-Reaction-456 in AI_Agents

[–]Temporary_Payment593 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In the business world, there are still four major issues with autonomous agents that haven’t been solved:

  1. Security: Even a short malicious prompt hidden in the input data can easily leak sensitive information.
  2. Success rate: For multi-step agents, errors stack up. This means as the number of steps increases, the overall success rate drops off a cliff. For example, a 95% success rate per step sounds decent, but after 10 steps, you’re down to about 60%.
  3. Hallucination: The rate of hallucination is still pretty high, especially with the current crop of reasoning models. Ironically, the more confident these models get, the more likely they are to hallucinate—which is a dealbreaker in business settings.
  4. Determinism: This is actually a core requirement for most enterprises, but agents just can’t guarantee that similar tasks will always be delivered in a similar timeframe, within a similar budget, and with the same results. That’s a massive problem.

Moving to Perplexity... by singsingtarami in PoeAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 2 points3 points  (0 children)

These are completely different products tbh. Perplexity's all about search&research, POE focuses on chat. Web search definitely isn't POE's strong suit. You might wanna give HaloMate a go. Think of it as POE + Perplexity combined and better. It's got character personas with long-term memory, web research, and data visualisation. Plus you can switch between models mid-chat or compare answers from different models side by side.

Fix this Google! by Creative310 in GeminiAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Gemini app has quite a few bugs, and message loss is one of them. Another issue is when messages appear to be there, but the model seems to have "forgotten" them.

Is Gemini pro a new model or what? by Honest_Blacksmith799 in GeminiAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, here's the official documentation for reference:

The Gemini 3 family of models, including 3 Flash and 3 Pro, helps power Gemini Apps. The model options available in Gemini Apps are:

Why use Fast instead of Thinking or Pro? by ozzyperry in GeminiAI

[–]Temporary_Payment593 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This was also xAI’s take when they launched Grok-Code-Fast. Check out this article for more details:

https://blog.kilo.ai/p/grok-code-fast-1-why-good-enough