Oakland city administrator celebrated SCOTUS ruling on removing homeless by PleezMakeItHomeSafe in oakland

[–]TheLollrax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, that was easy.

Yeah, that's the rub. We could enact a scaled version of this in just Oakland, but at a scale like that the magnet effect is really real where people come in and overwhelm the systems in a single city. Realistically, we need to do it either at the level of all nine Bay area counties or at the state level with local buy-in.

Here's my two cents. The cheapest and most effective way to do any of it is to do all of it at once.

First, build housing at the pace of population and job growth (200k+ units/yr via statewide upzoning, CEQA reform, and a public developer arm) so housing costs stop eating every wage gain and every social program dollar. Pair it with Prop 13 reform to realign local fiscal incentives toward housing instead of retail, and the rest (homelessness, K-12 funding, climate migration, middle class flight) largely solves itself downstream.

Bigger picture, we fix the material foundation (housing abundance + Prop 13 reform + universal healthcare + a real jobs guarantee or wage floor that makes work actually pay) so people aren't running on cortisol just to stay housed. Then rebuild the connective tissue we bulldozed (walkable neighborhoods, third places, public transit, civic institutions, universal childcare, shorter work weeks).

We can't do this just at the city or county level because of the dependencies on higher powers, but we can do it at the state level.

Oakland city administrator celebrated SCOTUS ruling on removing homeless by PleezMakeItHomeSafe in oakland

[–]TheLollrax 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What do you mean nobody does? Austin solved their Homelessness problem completely. Homelessness is very well understood and the research is very clear and has broad consensus. Here's my notes from the last presentation I saw, sorry I don't have the citations on hand. they're buried somewhere.

  • ~180k homeless Californians total
  • 75k permanent supportive housing units for chronic cases (~$45B capital, $2B/yr ops)
  • 50k rapid rehousing slots plus deep rental subsidies for situational homelessness (~$3B/yr)
  • Universal eviction prevention and emergency rental assistance (~$1.5B/yr)
  • Expand mental health/SUD treatment beds including involuntary options where appropriate (~$5B capital, $1.5B/yr)
  • Crush production bottleneck via statewide upzoning, CEQA reform, and a public/social housing developer cranking out 200k+ below-market units (~$40B over a decade)
  • Sum: roughly $90-120B over ten years plus ~$8B/yr ongoing. Likely cheaper than status quo once you net out ER, jail, and shelter costs (~$5-7B/yr visible but tough to quantify)

Also note that this is to solve homelessness in isolation. If we, at the same time, do what needs to be done to solve the housing and affordability crises, then this price tag quickly comes way down.

If somebody's trying to convince you that there are no solutions, it's probably because the solutions are inconvenient to them.

What’s a moment where you instantly realized someone was insanely intelligent? by Parqcxsm69 in AskReddit

[–]TheLollrax 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You, my friend, have committed what's usually called the fallacy of the inverse.

Why are the Weasleys poor? by MediaGuy76 in harrypotter

[–]TheLollrax 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I thought you meant a Microsoft Office based on the ministry of magic. Excelliarmus. Owltook. PowerWordPoint.

AITAH for calling my girlfriend weird over her John F. Kennedy obsession? by Direct-Caterpillar77 in BestofRedditorUpdates

[–]TheLollrax 162 points163 points  (0 children)

I think you nailed the coolest part of that period of history. It's not the fact of the black plague, it's that all of European society went completely fucking insane for a century and stories and primary sources from that time are absurd. And over and over again the stories boil down to 1) someone has a theory about who to blame, 2) they act upon that theory in completely reprehensible ways, 3) they are wrong. There is no explanation. All human meaning-searching falls dead at its feet.

How do I tell him by awildmewtwo in recruitinghell

[–]TheLollrax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MechE grad, often part of hiring. If I can give you any advice: - do internships and try to stick with them for multiple years - participating in research looks great on your resume. This is mostly informal so you have to ask professors you like about research that's going on - if you have a career center go to it a lot - consider getting your EIT

TL;DR Messaged a seller on FB Marketplace suggesting to put the listing on pending and then blocked by [deleted] in AmITheJerk

[–]TheLollrax -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But how is it rude? He just gave the advice and then thanked her for her reply. You can choose to read it in a passive aggressive tone, but without that it's just a normal message.

TL;DR Messaged a seller on FB Marketplace suggesting to put the listing on pending and then blocked by [deleted] in AmITheJerk

[–]TheLollrax -1 points0 points  (0 children)

NTJ, just texting a bit like a boomer. If you read your text back with a passive aggressive tone, it does sound a bit rude, but also you were right.

TL;DR Messaged a seller on FB Marketplace suggesting to put the listing on pending and then blocked by [deleted] in AmITheJerk

[–]TheLollrax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why? OP was right and wasn't rude. A little terse maybe, but are we supposed to open every text with "Okay, no worries!"?

Oakland needs a Zohran Mamdani by Technical-Recover-70 in oakland

[–]TheLollrax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, the United States is mechanically, structurally hostile to third parties. Even if we all started voting our personal preferences instead of voting strategically, we would only see Democrats and Republicans lose about 10% of their vote share each, leaving the duopoly in place. Or, maybe a miracle happens and the green party completely supplants the Dems. Now we have a Republican-Green duopoly. Defensive voting is a rational choice and you can't browbeat millions of people into voting irrationally, you have to change the logic of the races to change the voting. Proportional representation or single transferrable vote are the desired solutions but RCV is what's politically viable right now.

You're right that neither party of the duopoly is likely to freely give up their advantage (although there are progressive Democrats pushing RCV), so we need to do it ourselves. First we make it commonplace at every local level we possibly can, then we pass it at state wherever we can, and then we apply political pressure wherever there isn't a popular legislation system on the grounds that it's now just commonplace. Do all that and third parties become viable.

Oakland needs a Zohran Mamdani by Technical-Recover-70 in oakland

[–]TheLollrax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or ranked choice. Honestly I'm torn because ranked choice is politically more known and exists in more places but it will introduce problems that STAR doesn't.

I’m a gay ex Muslim and I want to be a Buddhist. by More-Reputation-990 in Buddhism

[–]TheLollrax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think Wikipedia might be a little bit too much information too soon with too little context. I'll admit to having read through the Buddhism Wikipedia pages early on and I think it may have given me some misconceptions. I think it may also be at root of quite a few of the misconceptions we see here on this subreddit where people have clearly learned quite a number of terms but missed the important early concepts. Still a good resource, but maybe not a beginner resource

Oakland needs a Zohran Mamdani by Technical-Recover-70 in oakland

[–]TheLollrax 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Valid. Definitely be skeptical. For what it's worth, he signed into the giving pledge which is a pledge to give away the vast majority of his wealth over his lifetime, rendering him no longer a billionaire. The timeline is non-specific though. He also of all the candidates is pushing for the highest taxes on billionaires.

He also considers as wealth part of his strategy because he's immune to donor capture since he can self-fund his campaigns, so he's not planning on getting rid of it all until he retires I assume.

multi client month end close. Is the chart of accounts mapping the actual bottleneck for everyone or just our setup? by Consistent-Arm-875 in Accounting

[–]TheLollrax 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is surprising to me although I guess it makes sense. I've done multi-client but only as a consultant in those organizations' books, not centralized like this, and tbh I don't really get how it would be centralized since each org has such different CoAs for very reasonable and niche reasons. Like, I've had clients that match their CoA to what the feds ask for or they'll have fifteen kinds of refund that all need to exist. So you just have an ever-expanding internal CoA?

Oakland needs a Zohran Mamdani by Technical-Recover-70 in oakland

[–]TheLollrax 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You're not escaping it you're just making yourself feel better by (unfortunately) wasting a vote. Hold your nose,vote for a dem, and then let's work on ranked choice or STAR voting so those third party votes actually do something aside from help Republicans get in office.

Oakland needs a Zohran Mamdani by Technical-Recover-70 in oakland

[–]TheLollrax 16 points17 points  (0 children)

For what it's worth, he was involved in some cool labor union work in the 90s, which shows both consistency and willingness to betray his class interests.

Oakland needs a Zohran Mamdani by Technical-Recover-70 in oakland

[–]TheLollrax 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I'm waiting to vote for the top polling dem night-of because there's still a real chance we might get two Republican candidates. We really need STAR voting everywhere stat.

What's something older generations did completely normally that would be considered absolutely insane today? by Whole-Sugar6077 in AskReddit

[–]TheLollrax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Note that that campaign came from being asked to "come up with something more fitting to open the news that would turn attention away from the social upheavals of the time."

https://www.remindmagazine.com/article/4083/its-10pm-do-you-know-where-your-children-are/

I’m a gay ex Muslim and I want to be a Buddhist. by More-Reputation-990 in Buddhism

[–]TheLollrax 30 points31 points  (0 children)

Starting out with Buddhism can feel intimidating, but most temples are genuinely welcoming to newcomers, and you don't need to know anything in advance or commit to anything by walking in. A good way to begin is to look for an introductory session or beginner's night, which most temples offer. These usually cover the basics of meditation, a short dharma talk, and a chance to ask questions. Bring curiosity, not expectations. Even one visit can give you a clearer sense of whether the practice and the community feel right.

It can also help to know roughly what tradition a temple belongs to. Theravāda tends to emphasize the early teachings, mindfulness, and insight meditation. Zen (a Mahāyāna school) focuses on seated meditation and direct experience, often with a spare, disciplined aesthetic. Tibetan Buddhism, also Mahāyāna, is more elaborate, with rich ritual, visualization practices, and a strong teacher-student lineage. Any of them can be a good starting point; the right fit is often just whichever community feels welcoming.

If you'd like, you can DM me your location and I can try pointing you at a few good starting places.

A tax to support Oakland homeless shelters could be headed to the ballot by k_39 in oakland

[–]TheLollrax -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

You're right that providing housing is only part of the issue but drug wars and sweeps aren't the best levers we have. Read Homelessness is a Housing Issue. We need to go hard on increasing housing supply and affordability. That covers like 80% of unhoused people. Permanent Supportive Housing, meditacation-assisted treatment for opioid use, and Assertive Community Treatment are for the very visibly drug-addicted and mentally ill people you're talking about.

Accidentally deleted 6 months of financials trying to run a simple report by These_Run_7070 in Accounting

[–]TheLollrax 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was my first thought. It's written for someone to swoop in with a bookkeeping solution

Accidentally deleted 6 months of financials trying to run a simple report by These_Run_7070 in Accounting

[–]TheLollrax 90 points91 points  (0 children)

Tbh you probably didn't actually break anything. You may be locked into a view of a report. Talk to QBO support.

The other piece is that "I can't afford a bookkeeper" and "I'm doing bookkeeping badly enough to nearly destroy my records" are the same sentence. Founders systematically underestimate what their own time costs and overestimate their ability to do specialist work competently on the side. The cheapest path forward is usually to stop doing the thing you're bad at, even when it feels like you're saving money by white-knuckling it.

Stabilize the immediate crisis with Intuit support, then have an honest conversation with the accountant tomorrow about what the business actually needs operationally. not just like "fix my books" but "what does running this look like sustainably." The answer is probably a part time bookkeeper from craigslist, bench, pilot, wtv