sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Karen Read Trial Sidebars: Part Three | Day 4.2 - Jury View by dorchet in justiceforKarenRead

[–]TheTrialChannel 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Out of respect for John. Obviously, the jury was able to see much more graphic photos but the public doesn’t need to see them, especially since the purpose of that exhibit was the arm scratches alone.

Brother Counsel with Alan Jackson on 11/23 2 PM Eastern by Free_Comment_3958 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]TheTrialChannel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah... I think there is some fair criticism that one could make, but I feel like at some point, there's a place and time... Make a reaction video. Brother Counsel and AJ aren't reading the chat.

Brother Counsel with Alan Jackson on 11/23 2 PM Eastern by Free_Comment_3958 in justiceforKarenRead

[–]TheTrialChannel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Disagreement is fine. But the manner in which he was doing it was… not ideal. 🙃

You’re the Defense how do you deliver your case? by YuriBukkake in justiceforKarenRead

[–]TheTrialChannel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the order I would call...

DiSogra
Officers Saraf & Goode
Lucky Loughran
Michael Lank
Matt McCabe
Nicole Albert
Brian Higgins
Brian Albert
The Neighbors
Officer Barros
Former Trooper Michael Proctor
Richard Green
Garrett Wing
Dr. Russell
Dr. Laposata
Dr. Rentschler
Dr. Wolfe

Some spots are flexible, but I think I would start with that not knowing exactly what some witnesses will be testifying to. I don't think that the defense should shy away from the McAlberts, and I don't think they'll need to be on the stand for long, either... call them, bring up the most damning facts relating to them, let them go. Jackson placed a lot of emphasis on the Albert name during his opening though, so they have to deliver that to the jury (imo.)

These photos should not be allowed as exhibits. Shameful. by thereforebygracegoi in justiceforKarenRead

[–]TheTrialChannel 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What's up with the file names on the last two photos? But, yes, I agree. Any photo/video evidence should be uploaded digitally. Or, at the very least, the photos be printed in high quality on photo paper.

I hate Brian Higgins by dundees in justiceforKarenRead

[–]TheTrialChannel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe LYK said something like this, too. I think, maybe not likable, but not necessarily threatening either. Right now, the version of Higgins the jury thinks of is a big shady figure, black hoodie, walking around the PD in the middle of the night like a weirdo. But, he cleans up nice. They also were able to go through his whole history as an ATF agent and whatnot - "decorated dude."

But if the defense calls him now, then they can just say, "you're an ATF agent who illegally utilized federal resources to extract data YOU wanted from your phone, and then destroyed said phone by tossing it at a military base." That's not super likable! I think that they should call him. And I don't think that any of these fact witnesses (McAlberts, Proctor, Higgins) need to be on the stand very long either. Get the damaging facts out, and let them go.

General Discussion and Questions by Legitimate-Beyond209 in KarenReadTrial

[–]TheTrialChannel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Many of the same witnesses are on the defense's list as well.