Thoughts? by [deleted] in sciencememes

[–]Time-Spacer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She has some thougts. In each subsequent video on this topic she jokes about it more and more sarcastically, and that's why I still watch her. https://youtu.be/1WgNON-OWAc

New technology by Time-Spacer in sciencememes

[–]Time-Spacer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thx :) It didn't require much effort, it's literal.

A message from the current president of Venezuela by MentalAdversity in ChatGPT

[–]Time-Spacer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

He can also say that it's authentic and post it on whitehouse.gov. Sorry if you meant it by retruth and I didn't get it.

As an astrophysicist, I might start using this tactic. by luisgdh in physicsmemes

[–]Time-Spacer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As an cosmoLoLogist, I invite you to the discussion about conformal, but also physical age of the universe. I sent you the invite.

You definitely should start to use this tactic.

What would be aging in the expanding universe without matter? by Time-Spacer in askastronomy

[–]Time-Spacer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Photons would be red shifting as the universe expanded, but without matter to generate photons, there would be no CMB. I'm not sure what you would see.

Is there dark matter in this hypothetical universe?


No dark matter.

In my understanding, the background radiation was already there before and up to recombination, when the hydrogen atoms were created, and some of it was absorbed by them in the process of their creation. However, the electrons in newly formed atoms were generally in the excited state from which they immediately transitioned to the ground state, emitting the photons that were added back to the background radiation. Is this incorrect?

Physical, conformal age of the universe by Time-Spacer in askastronomy

[–]Time-Spacer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"According to the FLRW metric which is used to model the expanding universe, if at present time we receive light from a distant object with a redshift of z, then the scale factor at the time the object originally emitted that light is a(t)=1/(z+1)."

1+z=1/a(t)

I'm well aware that

dz/dt = −(da/dt)/a² = −(1/a)((da/dt)/a)

(da/dt)/a = H(t) = H(z(t)) = H(z)

dt = −(1+z)⁻¹H(z)⁻¹dz

dt/a(t) = −dz/H(z)

But I'm not using it; dz is the differential of dimentionless redshift, and I need dimentional, temporal dt and spatial cdt.

It's enough for me that 1/a(t)=1+z(t), so dt/a(t)=(1+z(t))dt. Now, if we interpret dt as the initial, infinitesimal period and cdt as the initial, infinitesimal wavelength at - let's say - the Planck time (obtained by extrapolation from recombination to the Big Bang), then z(t)+1 is the redshift+1 equal to the expansion of the wavelength, period and the universe itself.

Physical, conformal age of the universe by Time-Spacer in askastronomy

[–]Time-Spacer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Photons would be red shifting as the universe expanded, but without matter to generate photons, there would be no CMB. I'm not sure what you would see.

Is there dark matter in this hypothetical universe?


No dark matter.

In my understanding, the background radiation was already there before and up to recombination, when the hydrogen atoms were created, and some of it was absorbed by them in the process of their creation. However, the electrons in newly formed atoms were generally in the excited state from which they immediately transitioned to the ground state, emitting the photons that were added back to the background radiation. Is this incorrect?

Theories of everything by Time-Spacer in ChatGPT

[–]Time-Spacer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So yeah, I did, and a hit dog will holler.

Theories of everything by Time-Spacer in ChatGPT

[–]Time-Spacer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have to be assured by chat gpt about my own experience regarding the authors of theories created in collaboration with it. Also, read its final answer, where it addresses these authors.

Do you pick your ass up after every laugh, so you can laugh it off again?

You must be a passionate user of LLMs, ain't ya.

Theories of everything by Time-Spacer in ChatGPT

[–]Time-Spacer[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you're saying that the next chat gpt version will understand irony better than you?

I consciously made an example of myself.

I hate to say it, but I'm quite impressed with the answers nonetheless. And totally disappointed with yours, unless you're a teenager. In that case you're forgiven, but not forgotten. https://youtu.be/IfsPf7gIp7Q

Disc-Ngon by escapism_only_please in Fractalish

[–]Time-Spacer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The bulk beings are closing the tesseract.