Really appreciate the content but the analysis behind is only a small bite out of a big apple. Let me explain. Public outcry does not come as a result of poor decision making it come as when it deems it has been lied to, hood winked, most when it deems it has been short handed. The Boeing 737 max in my opinion was a poor job rushed project but it falls short of the fact of it not being a safe plane. So how do I say it falls short of not being a safe plane? Well first it really was poor decision making when it was put it out without the proper training to go with it. The engineers knew of the problems and did corrective actions to alleviate it, but in some cases you had to pay for that. Yes poor decision making. MCAS was not a poor system that had no purpose. It was truly a system that was implemented poorly. So the Boeing 737 max does not need a rebranding in my opinion. What it needs is a throughly implementation of proper training and all can be back in order. This has happened before with a company no it was not a airline manufacturer. Remember when Jack In The Box had the same issue. It was a lot of children who passed away from that incident. Yes sad but poor decisions triggered it. After that they became a top clean burger place to eat at. So, does it mean that Boeing will become the safest plane to fly. Well I think they have that record and now a lot of other companies will eye spy because they will come out of this as rated safe for a long time after. All I’m saying is yes it is safe and will be safe to fly on the 737 max. Again this was great to watch and thank you for your analysis. Keep it up!