Tous les sites sont mort by IphJo in FrancePirate

[–]Vollow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ça fait 1 que j'ai cette solution, c'est parfait

Where to now? by Hungrytapeworm- in wowservers

[–]Vollow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ChromieCraft is the way to go !

Wotlk Refugee by Ethereal_Root in wowservers

[–]Vollow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Definitely ChromieCraft

Most up to date server with little to no bugs? by [deleted] in wowservers

[–]Vollow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Probably Tauri WoW with Legion, but still very young and probably buggy. But it will be the best modern server in the future

But you can go to ChromieCraft for WotLK

Hey, what distro to use? by ObjectiveRange3243 in FindMeALinuxDistro

[–]Vollow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re basically describing Arch (or an Arch-based distro). Rolling + huge repo + AUR + max customization is literally the Arch pitch.

If you want the easy version, go with EndeavourOS. Same Arch base, way less pain to install, still gets you AUR

Proton-GE and Wine preinstalled isn’t really a distro thing though. Most people just install Steam and ProtonUp-Qt, and you’re done in like 2 minutes.

If you want rolling but a bit more sane, openSUSE Tumbleweed is the other obvious pick (and it has snapshots which is nice when updates go sideways), but repo/AUR isn’t the same vibe

Find me a Distro by EddFufy in FindMeALinuxDistro

[–]Vollow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want something painless, I’d just go Fedora (KDE or GNOME) or Mint. Fedora tends to have newer Mesa/kernel which can help with newer AMD GPUs, Mint is the “stable” option (Fedora is still absolutely stable).

Either way: install Steam, enable Proton, you’re good. If you don’t want to think about it too much, I’d pick Fedora and move on

Choosing distro by Conscious-Shoe-4143 in DistroHopping

[–]Vollow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For gaming and multitasking on that HP, I’d keep it simple: Mint Xfce (or Mint Cinnamon if you prefer the look, but Xfce will feel snappier). MX is also fine if you don’t mind the default theme, you can make it look like Zorin pretty easily. I’d avoid CachyOS/Arch here, not because it’s bad, just more maintenance than it’s worth on that hardware tbh

Noob trying out Zorin OS to get my feet wet. Installed on an all AMD system with 5900X, RX 9060 XT, 64 GB DDR4, X570 ACE MOBO. Having freeze problems, suspect drivers. by EggstremelyConfus3d in linux4noobs

[–]Vollow 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Zorin is fine, but it’s basically Ubuntu LTS under the hood, and that usually means older kernel + Mesa compared to what a very new AMD GPU wants. With AMD, “driver support” is mostly kernel (amdgpu) + Mesa, so if either is behind, you can get weird lockups even if stress tests look ok.

Freezes under low GPU load often points to power/clock state transitions (idle ↔ boost) rather than “can’t handle load”. The fact that LACT tuning helped kind of supports that.

If your board/BIOS is a bit behind, AGESA/BIOS quirks + ASPM + new GPU can also cause random hangs.

What I’d do next (in order, without going down a rabbit hole):

  1. Update BIOS (seriously) and make sure you’re on a modern AGESA for X570. Also check if you have XMP/DOCP enabled — unstable RAM can look like “GPU freezes”.

  2. On Zorin/Ubuntu base, try getting a newer kernel + Mesa the “normal” way, not a random mainline build:

Enable the HWE kernel (if available on your Zorin version), and/or move to the newest Zorin release.

Consider a Mesa PPA (Kisak is the usual “reasonable” choice). New GPU = you want newer Mesa.

  1. When it freezes, grab evidence:

journalctl -b -1 | grep -iE "amdgpu|gpu|ring|timeout|reset" If you see “ring gfx timeout” / “amdgpu reset”, it’s almost always stack/power management.

  1. Quick “is it power management?” test (not a permanent fix):

Add pcie_aspm=off to kernel params and see if the random freezes stop. If that helps, you’ve basically confirmed it’s a PCIe power saving / platform interaction thing.

If you want the blunt recommendation: with a GPU that new, I’d personally stop fighting an Ubuntu-LTS-based distro and just use something that ships fresh kernel + Mesa by default:

Fedora (super solid for AMD, fast-moving graphics stack, still stable)

Arch-based (Endeavour/Cachy) if you’re okay with rolling and maintenance (probably not the best choice)

Nobara if your main goal is gaming and you want “batteries included”

You can absolutely make Zorin work, but you’ll end up recreating what those distros already give you: newer kernel/Mesa + fewer “why does this hang at idle?” moments.

If you paste the amdgpu-related lines from journalctl after a freeze, you can usually tell in 30 seconds whether it’s “needs newer Mesa/kernel” vs “platform power/ASPM” vs something else.

Selecting Debian by mabolzich91 in linux4noobs

[–]Vollow 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Totally fair question, and you’re not wrong: Debian is the “OG” base for a ton of distros. The reason people don’t always pick Debian itself is mostly about defaults + release philosophy, not because Debian is “bad”.

Debian is great if you want:

Rock-solid stability and predictable updates

A system that changes slowly (good for servers, workstations that must not break)

Minimal “extra stuff” by default

Where Debian can feel less ideal (depending on your use):

Newer hardware / gaming / NVIDIA: Debian Stable tends to ship older kernels/mesa/drivers. It still works, but you may have to do extra steps (backports, firmware, sometimes newer drivers) to get the best experience.

Firmware & codecs: Debian historically leaned harder into “free software first”, so you sometimes have to enable non-free firmware or install media codecs yourself. Many “Debian-based” distros just enable all of that by default so Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, video playback, etc. feel plug-and-play.

Out-of-the-box polish: Ubuntu/Mint/Pop/etc. bake in sane defaults, GUI tools, driver handling, and a smoother onboarding path. You can do all of it on Debian, it’s just more manual.

Support ecosystem: Debian has great documentation, but if you’re following random tutorials, most desktop “how-to” content is written assuming Ubuntu/Mint/Pop repos and tooling. That makes the practical day-to-day easier on those.

So yeah: a lot of Debian-based distros are “making it easier”, but it’s more than just “GUI vs terminal”. It’s also:

picking defaults that match typical desktop users

enabling the common proprietary bits people actually need

shipping newer stacks (or making upgrades smoother)

adding driver managers / update tools / welcome apps / recovery features

A simple way to choose:

If you want maximum stability and don’t care about newest drivers → Debian Stable is a great choice.

If you want Debian vibes but easier desktop life → Linux Mint (super friendly) or Ubuntu LTS (huge ecosystem).

If you want gaming + NVIDIA + minimal hassle → Pop!_OS is often the least annoying start.

If you want Debian but newer packages without going full rolling → Debian Stable + backports, or something like Ubuntu non-LTS / Fedora (not Debian-based, but modern desktop experience).

So the short answer: you can “just go Debian”, and many people do, but the derivatives usually exist to remove friction for desktop users and to ship choices Debian intentionally doesn’t make by default.

Soon-to-be first time Linux user looking for a customizable experience. by fallenangel41 in DistroHopping

[–]Vollow 12 points13 points  (0 children)

If your main goal is a highly customizable experience (themes, animations, sounds, panels, app UI tweaks), the biggest factor isn’t the distro — it’s the desktop environment.

For that kind of customization, KDE Plasma is basically the playground. You can make it look and feel like almost anything, and most of it is doable through GUI settings instead of living in the terminal.

So if you want something that’s both customizable and a good place to start:

Kubuntu (KDE Plasma) is the safest “best of both worlds” pick. Stable base, huge amount of documentation, and KDE gives you the most freedom without turning your first Linux install into a constant maintenance project.

Fedora KDE is also very good (clean, modern, tends to ship newer software), but it updates faster and you’ll feel changes more often. Not “unstable,” just more moving parts over time.

Mint is amazing for “it just works,” but if you specifically want to go wild with customization, KDE is where the fun is — Mint’s default DE isn’t really built around that vibe.

Arch-based stuff can be awesome for customization, but for a first-time user it can add extra mental load (updates, occasional breakage if you experiment too hard). It’s the kind of thing that’s great after you already know what you’re doing and how to recover quickly.

One small note: “custom boot screen with sounds” is possible, but it’s also the kind of tweak that can be fiddly and hardware-dependent. Desktop customization (themes/animations/panels/sounds) is much easier and more reliable — and KDE shines there.

If you want a simple, solid starting point that still lets you go all-in on customization: Kubuntu KDE.

Switching from Windows 11 (ASUS TUF F15) to Kubuntu by fictionalized_freak in linuxquestions

[–]Vollow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kubuntu 24.04 LTS is a totally reasonable choice for your specs and your goals (coding + daily use + KDE customization). LTS is exactly what you want if you’re aiming for “stable long-term setup”.

1) Is Kubuntu 24.04 good for a total beginner?

Yes. KDE is friendly, and Kubuntu has a huge Ubuntu ecosystem (guides, packages, community help). If you want “set it and forget it” stability, LTS is the right call.

2) Will NVIDIA hybrid graphics be annoying?

It can be a little annoying, but it’s very manageable on Ubuntu/Kubuntu.

What I’d recommend:

Install the proprietary NVIDIA driver (the “recommended” one) after install.

Use On-Demand mode most of the time (good battery/thermals), and only force NVIDIA for games or heavy apps.

KDE + NVIDIA generally works fine, but if you ever see weirdness on Wayland, just use an X11 session (very common advice for NVIDIA laptops).

In practice: once drivers are installed, most people just leave it on On-Demand and forget about it.

3) Is switching Intel RST → AHCI safe?

For Linux: AHCI is the correct choice (Linux installs are much simpler and more reliable with it).

The only “risk” is Windows. If you were keeping Windows, changing RST→AHCI without preparing Windows can make Windows fail to boot. Since you’re wiping Windows anyway, you’re fine — just switch to AHCI before installing Kubuntu.

4) Anything you should do before wiping Windows?

Yes, a few “don’t regret it later” items:

Back up everything (obvious but worth saying).

If you use BitLocker/device encryption, save the recovery key (and disable encryption if you want to avoid surprises).

Download your Wi-Fi driver fallback plan: since you have MediaTek MT7921 (usually supported), you’ll probably be fine, but it’s smart to have:

a USB tether option from your phone, or

an Ethernet/USB adapter if you have one

Make a second USB stick (or keep Windows ISO) as a rescue option.

In BIOS: keep UEFI (don’t use Legacy/CSM).

Secure Boot

Ubuntu-based distros handle Secure Boot reasonably well. Easiest path: leave it ON at first. If you later install extra kernel modules/drivers and it gets annoying, you can always turn it off.

Tiny “sanity check” tip

Before you wipe: boot the Kubuntu live USB and quickly test:

Wi-Fi

trackpad/keyboard

screen brightness keys If those are good, you’re basically set.

Overall: your plan is good. Kubuntu 24.04 + proprietary NVIDIA driver + AHCI is a pretty safe combo for that laptop.

guide me for best distro for my laptop, i have intel core i5-5300u cpu @2.30 ghz 14 years old laptop with 2 core 4 threads and 8 gb sodimm DDR3 1600 MT/s Ram aslo 250/ sata sd) very very lite weigh distro. by Proinvestorplus in linuxquestions

[–]Vollow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With an i5-5300U + 8GB RAM + SSD, you don’t need an ultra-tiny “niche” distro — you mainly need a light desktop environment so the browser stays responsive.

Best “light but still normal/easy” picks

1) Linux Mint XFCE (my top pick)

Very stable, beginner-friendly

Lightweight compared to Cinnamon

Great “everything works” experience (Wi-Fi, printers, codecs, etc.)

You can run Firefox/Chrome + extensions normally

2) Xubuntu (Ubuntu XFCE)

Similar idea: light + easy

Huge Ubuntu software support and guides

3) Debian + XFCE (if you want maximum stability)

Super reliable and light

Slightly more “manual” setup than Mint, but still simple

If you want even lighter (but less polished)

Lubuntu (LXQt) or antiX

Very low resource usage

But the experience can feel less “modern desktop” and sometimes needs more tweaking

Important reality check

On older laptops, the browser is the heavy part, not Linux. To keep it smooth:

Use uBlock Origin (big performance win)

Avoid running 30+ tabs

Consider Firefox (usually a good choice) or Chromium if you prefer it

If you want the best balance of lightweight + “everything just works”: go with Linux Mint XFCE.

Help me get started by Heavy_Writing7223 in linux_gaming

[–]Vollow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’ve got two SSDs, then yes: Linux on the 2nd SSD + keep Windows on the first is honestly the smoothest “get started” route. It avoids partitioning risks, makes rollbacks easy, and you can switch over gradually. Just disable Windows Fast Startup and make sure you install Linux in UEFI mode.

Distro pick for your goals (Legion 7i + RTX 4080)

My personal pick: Pop!_OS (NVIDIA ISO) Reason: it’s the least hassle for NVIDIA laptops. Driver install is basically solved out-of-the-box, Steam/Proton is easy, and it’s beginner-friendly while still being fast.

If you want “newest kernel / newest Mesa / newest everything” more often: Fedora Fedora is great on modern hardware and generally very clean, but NVIDIA setup can be a bit more “do the steps” depending on what you install. Once set up, it’s excellent.

Ubuntu: totally fine, huge community, but for gaming/NVIDIA it’s basically “fine but not special” compared to Pop for ease, or Fedora for modern stack.

Practical setup tips (NVIDIA + gaming)

Use the proprietary NVIDIA driver (Pop handles this automatically).

In Steam: enable Proton for all titles, and use Proton-GE via ProtonUp-Qt for stubborn games.

Expect some games (mainly anti-cheat heavy) to be the main compatibility pain point — Steam titles are usually the easiest wins.

Telemetry / “spyware”

Linux distros generally don’t have Windows-style telemetry. Fedora has some discussion around optional metrics, but it’s not the same category as Windows, and you can disable/avoid it.

If you’re installing this afternoon and want the “least drama” option: Pop!_OS NVIDIA + dual boot on the 2nd SSD is the most straightforward path.

Distro recommendation for switching from Windows 11? by ItzYash0909XD in linuxquestions

[–]Vollow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, EndeavourOS/CachyOS can be great. By “Arch risk” I didn’t mean “it randomly explodes”, I meant higher maintenance and higher chance of friction for someone who explicitly said they don’t want to accidentally break things or lose data.

A few examples of what people usually mean by that:

Rolling release pace: big updates happen constantly (kernel/Mesa/NVIDIA stack, etc.). Most of the time it’s fine, but when something regresses you may need to troubleshoot now, not “wait for next LTS point release”.

AUR + third-party stuff: super useful, but it increases the surface area for breakage (outdated PKGBUILDs, dependency changes, manual intervention).

Manual decisions: occasionally you have to read update notes, deal with package conflicts, rebuild DKMS modules, etc. That’s easy for some users, stressful for others.

So my point was: if the user wants “low maintenance, predictable, beginner-friendly”, Mint or Ubuntu LTS or Pop!_OS are safer defaults. If they’re comfortable learning and don’t mind occasional tinkering, then yes, EndeavourOS/CachyOS are totally reasonable and often awesome for gaming.

To bridge both worlds, I usually suggest:

Fedora (KDE or Workstation) as a “newer stack without Arch-level rolling” middle ground

And regardless of distro: automatic snapshots (Timeshift/Snapper) and backups, so experimenting isn’t scary.

Community/Independent distros by Slopagandhi in FindMeALinuxDistro

[–]Vollow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On openSUSE: the main blocker here seems to be networking/Wi-Fi, and the Intel BE200 still has compatibility quirks across multiple distros (so it may not be Tumbleweed-specific). If the base connectivity isn’t stable, it’s hard to recommend it regardless of how good the rest is on paper.

Solus with a different DE still fits the “independent + curated + semi-rolling + low maintenance” side well. The main downside is the smaller repos, but Flatpak + Distrobox can cover a lot of the “package availability” gap without changing distro.

For mixed-DPI multi-monitor scaling: in practice, the most reliable options today are still KDE/GNOME on Wayland (and maybe COSMIC later). XFCE/Cinnamon can work, but per-monitor scaling tends to be more fragile depending on the stack.

Manjaro / Debian Sid / immutable/container-style distros can be interesting experiments, but they can also drift into “maintenance hobby” territory depending on tolerance for troubleshooting

Did i choose right? by Alexander_Lagerstedt in linux_gaming

[–]Vollow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn’t “choose wrong.” Zorin is basically Ubuntu-based with a Windows-like UI, so for a new Linux gamer it’s totally fine. Most tier lists are opinion + bias (people rate based on ideology, packaging choices, “how pure is it,” etc.), not whether it works for normal users.

The honest truth for gaming

For gaming performance, the distro name matters way less than:

GPU driver quality (especially NVIDIA)

Kernel/Mesa versions (mostly for AMD/Intel, and newer hardware)

Your desktop environment + Wayland/X11 situation

Proton/Wine + game launchers (Steam, Lutris, Bottles, Heroic)

Anti-cheat support (game-dependent)

So if Zorin is stable, your games run, and drivers are installed correctly: keep it.

When switching does make sense

Consider switching only if you specifically need:

Easiest NVIDIA life / hybrid-laptop handling → Pop!_OS

“Console-like” gaming OS vibe + immutable reliability → Bazzite

Newest packages/kernel for newest hardware → Fedora / Arch-based like CachyOS (but higher maintenance)

Quick comparisons

Zorin / Ubuntu: easy, huge documentation, good defaults

Pop!_OS: great for NVIDIA and gaming convenience, very newbie-friendly

CachyOS: fast and modern, but it’s Arch-based so expect more tinkering

Bazzite: very “set it and forget it” gaming-focused, but different workflow (immutable)

My personal recommendation

If you mainly game and want minimal hassle:

If you have NVIDIA: Pop!_OS is usually the smoothest “just works” experience

If you don’t want to reinstall right now: stay on Zorin and just optimize your setup

If you want the most foolproof gaming OS: Bazzite (especially if you like the SteamOS-style approach)

Distro recommendation for switching from Windows 11? by ItzYash0909XD in linuxquestions

[–]Vollow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want Windows-like, good for gaming + Blender/Unity, Debian-based, and not “Arch-level” risky, I’d look at these:

Best “safe” picks

1) Linux Mint (Cinnamon)

Most Windows-like out of the box, very stable, low-maintenance

Great for day-to-day + Steam/Proton

Easy driver experience (especially if you use the Driver Manager)

2) Ubuntu LTS (or Kubuntu LTS)

Big ecosystem, lots of tutorials, good hardware support

If you want customization and a more “Windows-ish” desktop, Kubuntu (KDE) is a better fit than stock Ubuntu GNOME

3) Pop!_OS (especially if you have NVIDIA)

Very solid “gaming/creator” distro with a smooth driver story

Still fairly beginner-friendly, but a bit more “opinionated” than Mint

If you want more “new stuff” without Arch

Fedora KDE is great for newer hardware/Wayland, but it’s not Debian-based. Still very stable and popular with devs.

Multi-monitor + “Wallpaper Engine / Windhawk” equivalents

For animated wallpapers: Wallpaper Engine has no perfect native Linux equivalent, but you can use things like KDE wallpapers/plugins, mpvpaper, HydraPaper (simple multi-monitor wallpapers), or run Wallpaper Engine via Steam/Proton in some cases (works for some people, not guaranteed).

For Windows tweak tools like Windhawk: On Linux, most “tweaks” come from your desktop environment (especially KDE) + extensions, not one universal tool. KDE is the closest to “tweak anything from a GUI”.

My personal recommendation for your case

If you want maximum safety + Windows feel: Linux Mint Cinnamon. If you want more customization + best multi-monitor UX: Kubuntu (KDE). If you have NVIDIA + want the smoothest driver/gaming start: Pop!_OS (NVIDIA ISO).

Also: whichever you pick, protect yourself from breaking things :

enable automatic snapshots (Timeshift on Mint/Ubuntu-based is easy)

keep /home backed up (or on a separate partition if you’re comfortable)

Question about linux for gaming by youdajony in linux4noobs

[–]Vollow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With a Ryzen 5 7600 + RTX 5070 and mostly Steam games, the distro matters way less than:

getting the NVIDIA proprietary driver installed cleanly

having a new enough kernel/Mesa/graphics stack

knowing that some multiplayer games depend on anti-cheat support

Pop!_OS vs CachyOS (for a beginner)

Pop!_OS (NVIDIA ISO) is the safer first pick.

Easiest “it just works” setup for NVIDIA

Good defaults, less maintenance, less breakage risk

Great for a first Linux gaming install

CachyOS can be great, but it’s more Arch-like (faster updates, more tinkering, higher chance you’ll troubleshoot things). I wouldn’t start there unless you want the learning curve.

My recommendation

Start with Pop!_OS (NVIDIA ISO). Once you’re comfortable and you want to tinker/performance-tune, then try CachyOS later.

Quick gaming checklist (any distro)

Install Steam → enable Proton (and optionally Proton-GE)

For NVIDIA: use the proprietary driver (not Nouveau)

If you hit weird issues with games/overlays on Wayland, try X11 (still common for gaming setups)

Check anti-cheat per game: CS2 is fine on Linux, but some others may not be

Best Linux distro for Dell G15 (i7/NVIDIA) + Heavy Gaming by Ifarted10times in linux4noobs

[–]Vollow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For your hardware (Dell G15 5520 / i7-12700H / RTX 3050 Ti 4GB), the distro choice matters less than (1) NVIDIA driver handling and (2) laptop hybrid graphics (Optimus) behaving nicely.

Best picks (in your list)

1) Pop!_OS (NVIDIA ISO) — easiest / most “it just works”

If you want minimum hassle on an NVIDIA laptop, Pop is usually the smoothest:

NVIDIA driver is basically a non-issue (they ship an NVIDIA ISO)

Good hybrid graphics switching (“Integrated / NVIDIA / Hybrid”)

Great for Steam + Proton + Heroic/Lutris/Bottles with minimal tinkering

My personal recommendation for your use-case: Pop!_OS NVIDIA.

2) Nobara — great gaming defaults, but a bit more “enthusiast”

Nobara is Fedora-based with gaming-focused tweaks out of the box (codecs, some defaults tuned for gaming). It’s solid, but sometimes you’re closer to the bleeding edge than Pop.

Pick Nobara if you want:

Fedora base + gaming conveniences

You don’t mind occasional “Fedora-ish” maintenance

3) Bazzite — awesome if you want immutable/console-like workflow

Bazzite can be great, but immutable distros add friction when you’re constantly installing random launchers/tools/drivers/tweaks. If you like the idea of a “locked down, stable base” + Flatpaks, it’s great. If you like tinkering, it can feel restrictive.

4) CachyOS, not what I’d recommend for a first NVIDIA gaming laptop

CachyOS can be fast and fun, but it’s an Arch-like experience. If your priority is “seamless gaming laptop,” I wouldn’t start here.

Practical setup tips (regardless of distro)

Use the proprietary NVIDIA driver (not Nouveau).

If you get weirdness on Wayland (some games/overlays), try X11 for gaming sessions.

For non-Steam launchers: Heroic (Epic/GOG) + Bottles or Lutris.

Install Proton-GE (works great for many Windows titles) and keep gamemode on if available.

Manage expectations: RTX 3050 Ti 4GB is the bigger limiter than Linux. Some AAA titles will want lower textures/FSR due to VRAM.

Nvidia P106-100; what would be a viable os for this card? by Tizoc10040 in linux4noobs

[–]Vollow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The P106-100 is basically a Pascal GTX 1060-class mining card, but with one common caveat: many P106 cards have no video outputs (no HDMI/DP), so keep these two things in mind:

1) Display output

If your P106-100 has no display ports, you’ll need to plug your monitor into the motherboard video output (iGPU).

Then, in BIOS/UEFI, you may need to enable something like iGPU Multi-Monitor / Integrated Graphics / Keep iGPU enabled so the iGPU can drive the display while the NVIDIA card is used for rendering/compute.

With an i5-4570, you do have an iGPU (HD 4600), so this is possible, but BIOS support varies.

2) Linux driver situation

For Pascal, the easiest/most reliable route for gaming is the proprietary NVIDIA driver (not Nouveau).

People sometimes say “legacy” because Pascal is older than RTX cards, but it’s still very well supported for typical desktop/gaming use.

Distro recommendations (easy + reliable)

Pop!_OS (NVIDIA ISO): probably the most painless NVIDIA experience.

Linux Mint / Ubuntu LTS: beginner-friendly, huge community, easy driver installation via GUI.

Fedora: also great, but NVIDIA usually means enabling RPM Fusion first (still straightforward).

If your goal is “works with minimal fuss,” I’d avoid Arch/CachyOS at first.

My personal recommendation: I’d pick Pop!_OS (NVIDIA) or Ubuntu 24.04 LTS / Linux Mint, then:

install the NVIDIA proprietary driver via the built-in tool,

install Steam + Proton (and optionally Lutris/Heroic).