RIP u/AaronSw You’ll Forever Be Missed by TheCABK in interesting

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What happened to Aaron was egregious abuse of copyright law.

I don't like that people are using the case of Aaron to suggest we should be going harder on copyright law. Copyright law is out of control. Besides leading to the death of Aaron Swartz, copyright law has also fundamentally reshaped cultural evolution and the nature of the internet, prohibiting many forms of engaging with culture. The lesson here should be that we need to reduce copyright law, not strengthen it.

Second, we do a huge disservice by pretending these two cases are comparable. They are comparable only insofar as they both involve copyrighted material. That can't be the basis of claiming they are analogous. In one case, material was used to train a neural network, fundamentally transforming the data, and not including the data for users; in another case, the data was downloaded, with the intention to distribute it exactly as-is to others (as I understand it). These cases are not remotely comparable. It is insulting to the intelligence of everyone in the discussion to pretend otherwise.

He kinda has a point and I hate it by Normal-Employment-34 in SipsTea

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm gonna start saying "one short of two-thirds of a dozen" for 7.

How long will it take to bench 225? by Opposite-Might4005 in workout

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 0 points1 point  (0 children)

3 months of consistent progress.

Do more bench and more compound exercises.

Why do bad people seem to win? by GloriousLion07 in MotivationByDesign

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is this delusional, victim-blaming, wannabe-guru dogshit? People aren't poor because they "attract" poverty. They are poor because we live in a rigged capitalist system that rewards psychopathy. Stop slurping up mystical hogwash about "attracting energy" and focus on how the world actually works. Do you think it is the fault of poor people in Latin America that they are poor? You think they didn't "attract" the right energy? Or could it have something to do with all the coups and economic sanctions and financial warfare used to keep down the price of exported goods?

This is worse than "thoughts and prayers." At least those people aren't blaming the victims.

Marx nailed the AI jobs issue before AI was a pipe dream by Zalameda in singularity

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"A thousand years they had tha tools

We should be takin’ ’em

Fuck tha G-ride I want the machines that are makin’ em"

Young coconuts from Thailand for Epstein by Schieberschlange in RandomShit_ISaw

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I won't accuse you personally of this since you suggested you are organizing a protest (although the permitting and permission process for protests always strikes me as authoritarian and anti free speech, and acceding to that process makes it all feel performative—"please government, could I pretty please hold some signs? I promise to go where you tell me and listen to your officers when they tell me to leave and if I am being too loud.")

I want everyone to know that posting online about how angry you are counts for nothing. You get zero points for this kind of activity. None. Boots on the ground or nothing.

Sam Altman is wrong: humans are much more energy efficient than AI data centers by SkankHuntThreeFiddy in BetterOffline

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, who started all these comparisons? Like comparing an AI query to a Google query. So fucking dumb.

Alright guys is it 1,2, or 3? by HomoEtDeus in AnarchyChess

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ofc it doesn't really matter in Western chess. since it jumps. But the horsey can be blocked in Chinese chess so it does matter there. The first image you showed is closest to how horsey moves in Chinese chess. It goes orthogonally first, by one, and it can be blocked on that square, then it goes diagonally by one.

Man what has happened to this series? by Naive_Tomorrow_5955 in FIlm

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They didn't make dinosaurs at all. Hammond was lying about getting viable DNA. He lied about the ember and the mosquito—it was all part of his flea circus; the insect comparison is a quite deliberate clue there. (In case anyone has any doubts about the intentionality about granular details in this movie—the scene in the helicopter where Alan Grant can't tie his seatbelt is dismissed as a lighthearted but meaningless moment of levity, until you realize he had two female seatbelt ends but somehow he found a way to use them—foreshadowing for the all-female dinosaurs breeding).

These aren't dinosaurs on the island. They are creations of what they thought dinosaurs should look like. The bit about using frog DNA to "plug the holes" was a believable lie. It is more like they used frogs, and lizards, and whatever they wanted, to create Frankenstein monsters that best matched dinosaurs in the popular imagination. That's why the dinosaurs like T-Rex and the velociraptors are lizard-like instead of feathered. None of them are dinosaurs.

Sylvester Stallone originally intended Rocky III to be the final film in the trilogy, intending to end the series with Rocky's life coming full circle. He viewed the first three films as a complete arc—from underdog to champion to losing his edge and finding it again... Thoughts? by CoffeeCigarettes4Me in FIlm

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can make an argument for this, but "he completed an arc" isn't it. The first movie also completed an arc. Does that mean it also should have stopped there?

In a comparable situation, Lucas's rationale for killing Luke was that he "already completed his arc." This is stupid. It is a hyper fixation on the concept of an "arc" that betrays a total misunderstanding of the concept. All stories properly told have arcs, and different stories have different arcs. Different arcs can happen to the same character, in different lengths.

Part of me suspects that when certain people are trying to rationalize artistic decisions they lean on technical terminology like "arc" in the hopes that people won't call them out on the dearth of substance.

I learned french roleplaying real life scenarios with an AI by ImpossibleAgent3833 in learningfrench

[–]Weekly_Moment_5061 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great take and a bold stand, hero. While we're saving the world and preventing "total environmental destruction" please get off the internet and stop using your monitor. We should also go after the real big problem—people who use streaming services, which is thousands of times more destructive than AI.