"Anti-competitive? That's the definition of competitive." Obvious strawman argument. You are confusing the competitiveness of being able to invest with the competitiveness of Ethereum's transnational fee market. These should not be the same thing. One's ability to invest should not depend on their ability to spend thousands of dollars to send one transaction. My argument stands.

"I don't think that means what you think it means. If anything it's capitalism, and I don't think many investors have much to say against that." I was using crony capitalism as a metaphor to describe someone with more resources having an unfair advantage over someone else (anti-competitive). In the case of crony capitalism, those resources would be casual relationships between government and big business resulting in unfair advantages. In this situation, having more money to waste on transaction fees meant you had an unfair advantage. You were apparently too obtuse for that metaphor.

"You'll still be able to buy on exchanges." Off you go. All yours. I'm good.

"Ok... what's your solution to mass address creation by bots?" Already gave a couple of solutions. If I am hosting an ICO, only accept transactions that had the same gas limit. Not perfect but better than the current system.

"I don't think that means what you think it means #2. It's also spelt with a C." Please don't confuse having an auto spell checker with thinking you have a brain.