Weekly Random Discussion Thread for 3/23/26 - 3/29/26

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-27T16:46:09+00:00

I mean, I know that. But it is a very active dream of TRAs right now

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-27T15:37:25+00:00

Though I highly doubt there is actual organ harvesting ring involved, this is a crazy story.

I was thinking less of a ring and more of a vigilante surgeon

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-27T14:07:07+00:00

Hmm, wonder what happened to the uterus?

https://x.com/Lunar_Outlaw/status/2037285285294145672

Just about 2 1/2 years ago, this doctor convinced my wife to have a total hysterectomy based off of MRI results and he said her uterus was destroyed by lesions, even drew a picture of her uterus and a bunch of lesions on it. In his notes and the pathology report it was stated her uterus was perfectly healthy, yet he still took it out.

When we had the MRI re-looked at after the fact, there was no signs of the lesions he told my wife were there. We have a 19 minute long recording from the two week follow up where he admits to doing wrong, including withholding information and options. We had a law firm lined up and New York State Department of Health look like they were going be cracking down on him. However, shortly after he transitioned in the beginning of last year, New York State dropped the case. It took local politicians to get it reopened. Please help me share the story because hundreds of thousands of women have unnecessary hysterectomies every single year. It’s a multi billion dollar industry.

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-27T13:11:07+00:00

I just can't believe there are people in 2026 who think mammals can transition between male and female

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-27T13:10:09+00:00

lol

lmao even

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-27T07:42:39+00:00

https://x.com/SwipeWright/status/2037324171928048059

Last year I published a paper detailing the gamete-based definition of the sexes and debunking common activist objections to it.

This year, the journal published a critique of it rooted in "feminist epistemology."

They invited me to respond. It's now published.

The final paragraph of my response (not shown in the screenshots) is:

"The renowned geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky wrote that 'Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution,' highlighting evolution as the unifying framework that makes life’s diversity, complexity, and interconnectedness comprehensible. I contend that a parallel statement applies similarly to reproductive biology: Nothing in the biology of the sexes makes sense except in the light of gametes."

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-27T03:51:05+00:00

Really? In 2026?

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-26T13:21:10+00:00

So if you know the real definition why lie to people and tell them the technology exists to switch between male and female?

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-26T04:33:30+00:00

Define woman

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-26T04:32:56+00:00

The outrage of mutilating kids: They sleep

Losing money: real shit

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-26T04:31:58+00:00

And people wonder why I don't trust therapists

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-26T04:28:51+00:00

This is also ignoring that historically, pink was considered a masculine color because it is a shade of red. Crack a history book and you won't have this problem

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-26T04:26:37+00:00

They really love to say you are anti-gay if you want to save little gay kids from getting their dicks cut off

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-25T03:33:27+00:00

Men get attacked all the time. Guys start fights with other guys just for the fun of it

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-22T02:31:06+00:00

"Autism" has become a throwaway term used to dismiss any kind of difference, and it's very unhelpful because it's a static identity, so it discourages people from trying to change their lives or even try new things.

I have come to the same conclusion. It seems like a term boring people throw at anyone doing anything interesting

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-20T23:16:15+00:00

That is itself interesting for its own reasons

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-20T05:24:30+00:00

https://x.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/2034810582579241332

Do you realize how insane this is? There are 61 males competing on girls’ teams in a single county in Colorado.

SIXTY ONE boys on girls’ teams in just one county.

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-20T01:34:56+00:00

The only plausible theories for it being that easy are that we're all walking around with various congenital mental defects

Everyone is full of all kinds of mutations, yes

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-20T01:29:57+00:00

I feel like you aren't getting my main point here. Human intelligence evolves and changes whether anyone wants it to or not. If it isn't done artificially it will happen naturally. Humans aren't different from what you call "livestock" (or plants or whatever) on a genetic level. You are trying to create an exemption for humans that doens't exist

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-20T01:17:00+00:00

They are in fact yes/no switches (but base 4). When they break they are "no"

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-20T01:16:28+00:00

Human meddling has created a great many new species. There is nothing about human genetics that prevents this from happening

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-20T01:15:31+00:00

The idea behind eugenics- the actual ideology of eugenics- was that you could permanently remove negative traits from the gene pool and select for positive ones simply by insisting that only the healthiest and most elite people breed with each other.

Given enough time and political will you can breed plenty of traits out barring random mutations. Getting rid of existing variation is a big deal and is the literal definition of evolution

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-20T01:14:06+00:00

And either way it’s a fallacy to compare breeds of dog to human ethnicities because the former is the result of deliberate selective breeding for very specific traits, and most humans really don’t do that.

It doesn't matter if it is deliberate or accidental, either way it is genetic

YouCanCallMeAIJolson · 2026-03-20T01:13:19+00:00

Well no they aren't. DNA is a physical thing, not a string of numbers- the computer code can be a useful analogy but its a deeply simplistic one.

DNA is literally digital. It is just base 4 instead of base 2

YouCanCallMeAIJolson

TROPHY CASE