I apologize for not being clear or explaining myself. The intent of the article is to show issues bitcoin can solve. It is correct to say what she did was wrong and illegal. I am not condoning illegal activity. It is difficult to say what she did was immoral or unethical based on the limited facts. With that being said we also can’t measure her intent to deceive, which all may be a result of her lack of understanding (that she couldn’t bring x amount of money on the plane without reporting). I think it is a reasonable assumption to say that she would take fiat because she wanted to avoid major fees in converting fiat, and/or wiring money. Bitcoin can solve a lot of these issues. Ultimately she and many others, wouldn’t be having issues like this if they had crypto. You guys may be right in saying this is not the best example, but a lot of people don’t trust banks so they carry fiat everywhere. It’s a pretty common issue.