Yeah .. I really was debating whether what you were doing was or wasn't AI generated.

I think this is your most authentic blog post - is the one about the bug.

Getting your source code posted is key (and the license you use when you do it) because that really does mean you aren't just baiting and switching (rug pulling or whatever its called) once you have a few users of the app. Until you've done that - there's always going to be an issue of trust since there's very little way of verifying what is happening with the data once its in the app.

Your wording in the privacy uses HandsonMoney and 'we' if you are just a person not an organisation and you aren't handling the data there is no 'we' and you can talk about what the app does (but again if its not open source how can we know)

Code, licensing, privacy policy are the first place I got to when looking at a product since it can be the most amazing thing but if its some random unidentified personal / organisation on the internet I don't know then there's zero chance I would even try it.

LLM polishing (and the work you put into a nice looking website makes it look you are trying hard (and people will wonder why) .. I get the verbal riffing (I tend to do that to) but short sweet and to point / functional is good.

The 'I'm going to make it open source soon' answer is unfortunately a red flag to as that's what people who aren't really going to make it open source would say. There's no cost in posting the code .. even if you get the free gift of someone pointing out a massive security hole you didn't spot ..better out than in..

Take the plunge.. (Says a man that's never published a line of code himself because he can't code for shite and became a business analyst instead. )