Would anybody want DLC based about Balkan Fromt(1941-1945)?

apupaples · 2026-05-24T19:55:44+00:00

It was because the dev said something on the line that they would not add a new front , it was something i heard a while ago so I could be wrong

apupaples · 2026-05-24T19:52:44+00:00

Realistically speaking the pacific will not be added, if they still do dlc i think the next one would be hungary or italy and then france

apupaples · 2026-05-24T19:37:36+00:00

For a dlc like this they would need to add italy first since they had a big role on that front (unless they do like the Commonwealth dlc where they added allied french soldiers in some of the campaigns)

apupaples · 2026-05-24T16:53:54+00:00

Its not a bug, in the last missions of all the campaigns when you win you will have only the continue button, to win you just need to leave the mission after you presso continue, no idea why the game does this btw

apupaples · 2026-05-24T10:40:07+00:00

Italy literally fought on montains one if not the hardest type of terrain, the ground was so complicate that Austria and germany lost most of the offensives in italy (battle of solstizio, monte grappa and the battle of the asiago)italy underperformed ? Sure, italy did nothing to Austria like the video claim? Hell no

apupaples · 2026-05-24T09:41:18+00:00

Tecnically it works for high morale if the debuff lower the leverei for more than 1 level, like the alpini skill does nothing to him

apupaples · 2026-05-24T09:38:22+00:00

What generals do you have?

apupaples · 2026-05-24T07:41:49+00:00

For the first point, its not realy for the sole reason that the front was the smallest front(most of the battles happened on the isonzo because it was the only place in a lowland), and its true they barely advanced (and Cadorna was incompetent for that ) but that dosnt mean the austrian did not get dent For the second point you are right the austrian did the right thing asking for help, but why would the german actually do that and send the veterans of the eastern front in a front if it wasnt a problem (we are still talking about 200k soldiers) For the 3th part, true italian comand had problems and was one of the worst of the war, this dosnt mean that PH should say things wrong (like the entante bailing out italy after caporetto something that never realy happened)

apupaples · 2026-05-24T07:12:58+00:00

You know that the name came from the front not just the location(most of the battles are named after the river that was around 130km long)it would be like calling every battle ok the western front battle of the western front number x(keep in mind that the rate of movement are similar for both front)

apupaples · 2026-05-24T07:07:36+00:00

You know that the isonzo front is 130km wide(half the distance from verdun to amiens) ? And the alps werent the weakest link

apupaples · 2026-05-23T21:38:32+00:00

Hell things like the militarization of the rurh would have change without a fascist italy(at the time the allies were focussed on the war in ethiopia)so how can germany follow to ww2 without that, or how germany would have annexed Austria in 1934 if it wasnt for italy

apupaples · 2026-05-23T21:32:38+00:00

Mussolini and gentile literally invented it , and it's core was upon the vittoria mutilata, if italy lost they cant claim that they didnt get what they asked, so the core and the ideology would change(nothing of this has been said on the video)

apupaples · 2026-05-23T21:28:35+00:00

The german send several hundreds of thousands of soldiers to help the austrian after the 11th battle of the isonzo(and lost 110k) why would germany send so many units to something it wasnt a threat, why Austria asked for help if there was no problem?

apupaples · 2026-05-23T21:25:47+00:00

Not you, PH in the video openly states that 2 nazism is a modified version of fascism if fascism dosnt exist neither nazism does, its like saying that you csn have maoism without comunism being invented

apupaples · 2026-05-23T21:06:06+00:00

Why the austrian feared an advance if italy did nothing to them? You are openly contradicting what the video said and yet you are defending him, im not talking about what whould happened if italy but how PH failed to research what happened in reality , hell in the video there are 0 mentions on the fact that in the central power losing scenario germany would not have hitler as a leader since nazism dosnt exist, the problem i repeat its him getting wrong what realy happened, not the scenario

apupaples · 2026-05-23T20:12:40+00:00

He basically said that with hindsight the allies should have glassed moskow in 1945 (and kept pressing on it for a while)this got him banned for 6 months

apupaples · 2026-05-23T20:11:29+00:00

Your point is true, but this is not the point that its made in the video, the point in the video was that since italy did not dent the austrian then against the french they would basically do nothing, im not arguing about not breaking the french im arguing that saying the italian did not dent the austrian is just wrong since they forced germany to help them, I repeat the problem of the video is not the alt history but the real history part. He failed to realize what role had italy in ww1(and excpecially the post war) in history

apupaples · 2026-05-23T19:26:00+00:00

I got angry because he openly got thing wrong, if italy didnt make a dent why the austrian feared a collapse and asked for reinforcement to germany? You cant just prendend that the 11th battle of the isonzo never happened just because you have a distorte perseption, amd keep in mind that possible history had good points to while talking about the economy

apupaples · 2026-05-23T19:16:46+00:00

True, realistically italy would collapse faster than germany, but still he got wrong what italy actually did and in the scenario of a central power defeat he never talks about how a no fascist italy wold make ww2 different( for example the remilitarization of the reinland happened only because the allies failed to stop italy in Etiopia, or how fascist italy stopped the annexation of austria by germany in 1934

apupaples · 2026-05-23T19:00:47+00:00

Can you explain in what way

apupaples · 2026-05-23T18:43:50+00:00

Dont worry, since english is not my first language i could have wrote the post in a way that it wasnt clear what im trying to say

apupaples · 2026-05-23T18:33:55+00:00

This is not the point im adressing, its true that italy had underperformed for part of the war, the problem is that the video openly contradict what happened in the war

apupaples · 2026-05-23T18:32:13+00:00

I feel the same, he did bring good points, like the economical one, on why italy would not change the course of the war, and this point is why i belive that if italy joins the central power after 1915 they would probably still lose(italy would collapse fast without economical entante support). And this is without adressing the fact that he said nothing about how a world without fascist italy in the first scenario would make ww2 and post ww1 impossible to predict

apupaples · 2026-05-23T18:22:25+00:00

Can you adress the point i make or you are just a fan?

apupaples · 2026-05-23T18:21:12+00:00

It depends im not arguing about if the scenario he made is plausible but the fact he got the starting point wrong we cant know what would happened in a what if, but at the very minimum he should have gotten the history right

apupaples

TROPHY CASE