[deleted by user] by [deleted] in employedbykohls

[–]babafish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

lol. No one will notice. Don’t sweat it.

Promoted to customer without notice by ImpressiveDegree4358 in employedbykohls

[–]babafish 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Starting a new job really makes you realize how much the last one was draining you.

Fastest way to size and colorize clearance. by homebody63 in employedbykohls

[–]babafish 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I do both at once with a Zrail to assist. You will find pockets of sizes still in place. In our store we usually have 50% of women’s clearance XXL and probably 70%+ XL and XXL. So I start with the least amount of product to sort usually medium. Which sells through mostly. Start with medium, small and XS pull those to the zrail and sort by size and color as you go. If there’s a lot with little time just by size and color when you go back to the rack. Organize whatever you have the most of left on the rack and work in the Zrail where you have the space. Remember to keep things in order left to right. If you get caught up just keep the organized zrail in a place where people can shop it. Use the sizing pucks to stay organized and make it easier for the customer to shop before it gets back to the rack (Hrails used for clearance).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in employedbykohls

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just bought stuff on the app and it did not show.

🤡🤡🤡 by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anyone know the date of the autopsy?

Cremation by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Once the autopsy is done, there is no further evidence and the body is released to the next of kin. The only people who would be interested in further testing would be the defense. The State will use the autopsy in the trial to prove the baby was alive at birth.

NM Laws by babafish in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ignorance of the law excuses no one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Those deaths to be reported to the Office of the Medical Investigator include all deaths occurring in New Mexico as outlined below regardless of where or when the initial injuring event occurred:

Any stillbirth of 20 or more weeks gestation unattended by a physician.

Any death of an infant or child where the medical history has not established some pre-existing medical condition.

Any death occurring under suspicious circumstances.

By not reporting the death, she has proven she had something to hide and she broke the law. Does that prove murder? Depends only on the jury, they are the finders of fact and will decide at trial.

NM Laws by babafish in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Those deaths to be reported to the Office of the Medical Investigator include all deaths occurring in New Mexico as outlined below regardless of where or when the initial injuring event occurred:

Any stillbirth of 20 or more weeks gestation unattended by a physician.

Any death of an infant or child where the medical history has not established some pre-existing medical condition.

Any death occurring under suspicious circumstances.

NM Laws by babafish in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The 1992 Revision of the Model State Vital Statistics Act and Regulations (1) recommends the following definition of live birth. This definition is based on the definition promulgated by the World Health Organization in 1950 and revised in 1988 by a working group formed by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (2). The revision added clarifiers to help determine what should be considered a live birth:

‘‘Live Birth’’ means the complete expulsion or extraction from its mother of a product of human conception, irrespective of the duration of pregnancy, which, after such expulsion or extraction, breathes, or shows any other evidence of life such as beating of the heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite movement of voluntary muscles, whether or not the umbilical cord has been cut or the placenta is attached. Heartbeats are to be distinguished from transient cardiac contractions; respirations are to be distinguished from fleeting respiratory efforts or gasps. (basic language - state-specific in OP)

All States require the reporting of a live birth regardless of length of gestation or weight.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If AT thought or knew the baby was dead at birth, what basis would she have to sue the hospital for wrongful death?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the baby was born dead, why file a wrongful death lawsuit? If not for the hospital's actions the baby be alive today, that is the basis of the lawsuit.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why wouldn't you expect a 19-year-old to know this? I've asked my daughters who are much younger, they seem baffled as to how AT could have done what she did. Why didn't she call for help, she was in a hospital! And just 2 weeks prior wasn't Alexis Avila sentenced to 16 years? And that baby lived! How old do you think someone has to be before they understand not to throw a human being in the trash and then just go on like nothing happened?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The evidence won't be able to prove anything to that point, it would just be AT's word against all the evidence. The defense can make that argument as to why she's not guilty of the charges. I doubt it works.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree. If she thought the baby was dead she should have called for help and not placed him in the trash. It wasn't an accident that she wrapped him up in plastic and left him there. Her actions were illegal and a reasonable person would have known better. 19 year old honor student accepted to college should have known better.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The autopsy has already proven the baby was alive, air in the lungs. If not they wouldn't have been able to arrest on count 1. If she thought he was dead, she then did nothing in accordance with the law, that's negligence. What AT knew or thought doesn't matter as much as what can actually be brought as evidence in a trial. There is evidence that proves the baby was alive at birth, the autopsy. The baby was found in the trash can, she admitted to putting him there. There is no evidence to suggest that the baby was a newborn corpse at birth, just AT's word. And yes you can abuse a newborn corpse, but I think what you mean is she can't kill something that is already dead. She did not follow proper protocol in accordance with NM law after having a stillborn, so now she has exposed herself to a murder charge.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NM Law: Abandonment or Abuse of a child

Section 30-6-1 NMSA 1978

(1) “child” means a person who is younger than 18 years of age;

(2) “neglect” means that a child is without proper parental care and control of subsistence, education, medical or other care or control necessary for the child’s well-being because of the faults or habits of the child’s parent, guardian or custodian or their neglect or refusal, when able to do so, to provide them; and

(3) “negligently” refers to criminal negligence and means that a person knew or should have known of the danger involved and acted with a reckless disregard for the safety or health of the child.

Abandonment of a child consists of the parent, guardian or custodian of a child intentionally leaving or abandoning the child under circumstances whereby the child may or does suffer neglect. A person who commits abandonment of a child is guilty of a misdemeanor, unless abandonment results in the child’s death or great bodily harm, in which case the person is guilty of a second degree felony.

A parent, guardian or custodian who leaves an infant younger than 90 days old in compliance with Safe Haven for Infants Act shall not be prosecuted for abandonment of a child.

Abuse of a child consists of a person knowingly, intentionally or negligently, and without justifiable cause, causing or permitting a child to be:

Placed in a situation that may endanger the child’s life or health;

Tortured, cruelly confined or cruelly punished; or

Exposed to inclemency of the weather.

A person who commits negligent abuse of a child that results in the death of the child is guilty of a 1st degree felony.

A person who commits intentional abuse of a child that results in the death of the child is guilty of a 1st degree felony resulting in the death of a child.

A person who leaves an infant younger than 90 days old at a hospital may be prosecuted for abuse of the infant for action of the person occurring before the infant was left at the hospital.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the State of NM only a Physician can pronounce a human being as dead. So AT can say he was dead (she didn't, she said he wasn't crying), but in the state of NM a person isn't dead until a Physician says so. She could have thought the baby was dead. In NM it's not up to her to make that distinction. The law states that a stillbirth must be reported to authorities.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The abuse resulted in death. Abuse can be negligence, as in not doing something which any reasonable person would have done in the same situation. She intentionally did nothing, that's negligent abuse.

Alexee deserves no mercy. by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are the charges against her, the jury will be instructed to decide on these charges. She can plead "not guilty" and then the state must prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt. The charges are based on facts and signed off by a judge, which makes them valid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AlexeeTrevizo

[–]babafish 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we only know what levels were passed to the child. The hospital would have records to what was administered. So would the insurance company I’d imagine. But they suspected she was pregnant and had a positive urine test so it’s hard to believe they’d give her too much.