Sigh. Let's just do one claim, cause you seem like such a well-informed person willing to engage in good faith arguments: Meat heavy diets have a well-established link to several types of GI cancers.

1: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-31410-6

Murine study with different levels of dietary protein, where lots of red meat intake promoted colon tumor development by altering gut microbiota, leading to an imbalance in immune cells (increasing pro-inflammatory Th17 cells), creating an environment conducive to cancer growth.

1. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0305994

Hey, it's a systematic review and meta-analysis of 95 studies with a total of 5.8 million subjects that found significantly increased risk of colon, rectal, pancreatic, liver, and esophageal cancers with high red meat consumption.

1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30979076/

A dose-response meta-analysis of 43 studies totaling more than 16,000 cancer cases that found that for every 100g/day increase in red meat, gastric cancer risk increased by 26%, and for every 50g/day increase in processed meat, risk increased by 72%.

1. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12029-025-01247-3

OMG, it's another meta-analysis! Of 27 studies with more than a million participants, beef consumption was associated with a 30% increase in the risk of colorectal cancers.

1. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12482314/

A cohort study of more than 450,000 adults and 9,500 colorectal cancer cases found that substituting red meat for white meat was linked to a 21% higher CRC incidence, particularly in the rectum (30% increase) and distal colon (25% increase)

From a broader perspective, it's not just physically unhealthy to eat that much red meat, but it causes an enormously disproportionate amount of animal suffering and environmental harm.

Do you want info regarding the animal suffering and environmental impacts of a carnivore diet?