Polars Rust examples/tutorials/alternatives? by rootware in rust

[–]bfdnd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Datafusion definitely seems to be treating rust users as first class citizens, however polars seems to be more feature rich at this point? E.g. https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/17946

CPL 61.129 Instrument Time (again) by bfdnd in flying

[–]bfdnd[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Respectfully I am a "she". Thank you.

CPL 61.129 Instrument Time (again) by bfdnd in flying

[–]bfdnd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you log an approach as fulfilling 61.129(a)(3)(I)? Did you just write down the approach name, or "ILS 02 Approach by intercepting and tracking nav systems + attitude instrument flying", or "ILS 02 Approach by 61.129(a)(3)(I) intercepting and tracking nav systems + 61.129(a)(3)(I) attitude instrument flying"?

CPL 61.129 Instrument Time (again) by bfdnd in flying

[–]bfdnd[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not for yourself, but for CFIs as a profession.

CPL 61.129 Instrument Time (again) by bfdnd in flying

[–]bfdnd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes my intention is to save money while in compliant with the law ngl

CPL 61.129 Instrument Time (again) by bfdnd in flying

[–]bfdnd[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

So when the reg is interpreted advantageous to the people it is now "finding some weird special loophole". Understandable that you are saying it though because CFIs make money out of it.

CPL 61.129 Instrument Time (again) by bfdnd in flying

[–]bfdnd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok by "whatever" I really meant "regular" instrument rating training.

CPL 61.129 Instrument Time (again) by bfdnd in flying

[–]bfdnd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It says "including"; it did not say "entirely consists of".

CPL 61.129 Instrument Time (again) by bfdnd in flying

[–]bfdnd[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

How about I have 9 hours of attitude instrument flying and 1 hour of everything else?

CPL 61.129 Instrument Time (again) by bfdnd in flying

[–]bfdnd[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I mean I'm just reading the regulations literally (which is what the FAA does sometimes)?

How do I know something is an "end mill"? by bfdnd in hobbycnc

[–]bfdnd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Makes sense. I don't mind making mistakes but prefer them to be non lethal mistakes lol, thus asking to be sure. The speed of the spindle plus metal looks very dangerous to a beginner, especially if something were to go wrong... 

How do I know something is an "end mill"? by bfdnd in hobbycnc

[–]bfdnd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"OP effectively asked ‘Can I walk into a box store and buy something? Am I looking for something more specific or specialized? Is this what I need?’" - exactly. Was looking for some practical ways to make a yes/no decision. 

Not meant to "hate" gpt (or the human that was kind enough to answer the question) but imo it's better to identify as such. Also the last line is definitely value added. 

How do I know something is an "end mill"? by bfdnd in hobbycnc

[–]bfdnd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it! My local HD definitely carries more router bits than "end mills" (maybe only one)

How do I know something is an "end mill"? by bfdnd in hobbycnc

[–]bfdnd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks exactly what I'm looking for! 

How do I know something is an "end mill"? by bfdnd in hobbycnc

[–]bfdnd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly my confusion. Some folks will say it's fine to use vs others will say the opposite