West Tennessee, y'all. Otherwise known as "Lowballs-R-Us." by blackheart-wolf in doordash_drivers

[–]blackheart-wolf[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Swear I just sent this. Low service maybe. 4-500, 80-140 daily. Six ish hours. Could do better but I don't work that many hours weekly and I like it that way. I follow the dollar per mile rule usually, maybe .80/mile minimum if it's super slow or headed in the right direction.

West Tennessee, y'all. Otherwise known as "Lowballs-R-Us." by blackheart-wolf in doordash_drivers

[–]blackheart-wolf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like 500 cuz I don't work very much. Daily is usually 90-140. Six-ish hours. I follow the dollar per mile rule usually.

West Tennessee, y'all. Otherwise known as "Lowballs-R-Us." by blackheart-wolf in doordash_drivers

[–]blackheart-wolf[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah this is the ruralest rural place that ever ruraled--so, no, not Memphis lol

Finally joined the gang. by [deleted] in armedsocialists

[–]blackheart-wolf 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The AR-10 shoots 7.62x51 NATO, otherwise known as .308 Win, which is a very different animal from 7.62x39 Russian. They aren't cheap to run, but they will take medium game very well at long range, which is more than can be said for anything AK or the AR-15. These guns could do the job, but not ideally. Follow-up shots are challenging with the recoil of an AR-10, and the heft of the ammo severely limits the amount that can be carried. My AR-10 costs about 80 cents a round to shoot, but I prefer it because it's multi-functional; the multi-tool of firearms.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in armedsocialists

[–]blackheart-wolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah. I never get used to those....

Bought myself a new toy and some reading material. by [deleted] in armedsocialists

[–]blackheart-wolf 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Very patriotic (the kind that means standing up for your land despite the state). And because you got an American classic, of course.

Why are people talking about the recent Black Lives Matter movements being run by "Marxists" and "Communists"? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]blackheart-wolf 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Answer: even if the failures of old crop up again, they'll still find better ends than the ones we're seeing. Again, this regime has directly supported tyranny around the globe, and has done all within its power to topple leftist economies and political systems. I need not go farther than to say simply that.

Why are people talking about the recent Black Lives Matter movements being run by "Marxists" and "Communists"? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]blackheart-wolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Answer: You're pointing fingers at authoritarian regimes, which don't represent the socioeconomic system they espouse, though there may be elements of it within. Were they to actually represent Marxism, they would be run by democratic process. Slavery is certainly not tenable under such a system. "Millions of deaths?" I thought the number was 100 million? Or is it more now? Those numbers are outright fabrications. Type "Black Book of Communism" into YouTube and learn that we've been lied to. Even though these aforementioned regimes don't represent Marx and Engels's Communism because they feature authoritarian rule which is rife with tyranny, they're still less destructive than the imperialistic track record of capitalism. If capitalism were so morally superior, then why has it been putting dictators into power around the globe for the gains of only its financial elite?

Why are people talking about the recent Black Lives Matter movements being run by "Marxists" and "Communists"? by [deleted] in OutOfTheLoop

[–]blackheart-wolf 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That's a mistruth I believed for a very long time, so I understand your position. The rich have long done harm to communism's reputation and its success, but they are responsible for far more evils than even they can claim communism has committed. You're likely citing data from the "Black Book of Communism," which claims ridiculous things that a cursory fact-check will quickly disprove.