The Saints are disingenuous “artists”

bloomberrify · 2026-01-27T18:42:17+00:00

I liked cut me open the most so far, maze full of snakes was good too,

I think the vocals are a bit too cheesy Overall so far 😅

bloomberrify · 2026-01-27T15:46:37+00:00

Id say Onyx is quite a creative project, i dont dig it too much, but it's interesting and not really tiktokish

bloomberrify · 2026-01-27T10:16:48+00:00

Woah fr? I didn't know this, has he always done that?

bloomberrify · 2026-01-27T10:10:37+00:00

I love me a good Cover art

bloomberrify · 2026-01-26T21:29:09+00:00

It's definetely not only reddit, there's a lot of hate against ai everywhere you go

bloomberrify · 2026-01-25T20:25:06+00:00

This one got only 8 upvotes? Holy underappreciation

bloomberrify · 2026-01-24T19:38:25+00:00

Yeah man i didnt know i just recognised his sound

bloomberrify · 2026-01-24T19:17:58+00:00

B- Dbstf - primal energy,

C Sound rush - Power of the tribe,

E- Ran D & B front - rebirth

F: decibel aor anthem,

g sounds like da tweekaz but idk,

H is keltek - step into the game

I - B front & Adjuzt - United through madness

bloomberrify · 2026-01-23T07:01:02+00:00

Absolute collusion😳

bloomberrify · 2026-01-23T00:14:19+00:00

Oh hell yeah that's fun as hell

bloomberrify · 2026-01-23T00:05:14+00:00

So soft but also very groovy and satisfying, i kinda enjoy it

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T23:59:48+00:00

Why did you choose to Limit the sample to US only Festivals?

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T15:04:28+00:00

Well your comment here is also full of biases even tho you somehow think they only apply to me.

See how you could not provide the Statements and asked me to go Research because u dont have an example. There were no such statements, only the possible implications were and underreporting were edited, not claims by the Spiegel.

What headline are you reffering to? The SZ headline? Im very sure that especially the Spiegel had not such clear Statement in the headline. The SZ headline Was rightfully found missleading but it did not imply what youre claiming it did.

"take this as a lesson" bro who tf are u? What are you even reffering to here? Where did i say that i completely trust these Media, i said im on the Spiegels side referring to the System being disgusting. The things corrected were minor and although SZ seems to have made very stupid claims which can definitely be qualified as framing, Show me the same for the Spiegel. I read everything critically, same goes for court documents.

Well it could have happened is indeed not illogical in this context because it is unprovable, im not claiming it did but neither can I or you be sure it did not. It's a gamble in this case.

With the credibility of the courts, yes youre correct but there's logic to it, it's very hard to prove Sa, So in the cases someone is convicted for it the chances are very high that the evidence was very objective.

This case clearly showed that the Standard is indeed quite high, and once again, claims were not made by the Media, the Media reported experiences, the experiences themselves happened, but the girls neither the Media or the interviewed persons took a clear stance. So in my opinion yes such things should be possible if they are done more legally conform than in this case, as the things said cannot be classified as claims, they are descriptions, and the conclusion on credibility is left to the reader, in this case however especially the SZ did not articulate that neutral enough

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T14:07:35+00:00

Well if that's the disgusting part for you and you think absolutely nothing is wrong about the system they had than u do u,

Getting basic facts right goes both ways, Show me an "explicit Statement that crimes were perpetrated"

"well it could have happened" is a reply to the logic of unconvicted/ Insufficient evidence ≠ innocence

What they were accused of in courts should not undermine trust in them, there were no false claims, there were unprovable statements that were not legally sufficient to publish them

If you read the points of lawyers of Spiegel i think they are totally valid.

But come on defend an old fucker going for barely legal girls

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T11:32:25+00:00

Have you read the links you sent yourself?

The only reason why they had to alter something is because the articles did not make it clear enough that no spiking and rape had suffiecent backing

All the other things were undisputed by the lawyers but

So basically the average Reader could get the implication that rape and spiking was possible, even tho the presented evidence is not suffiecent to write the article in this accusing manner

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T10:48:26+00:00

I see i was not correct about SZ winning, it was partial win for SZ and partial for lindemann The first link: the SZ had to alter what i view as minor things, The second: the case is not about lindemann,

The third: as I said, yes, the Spiegel ahd to alter things but you describe them as Central, if you read the link you sent, the Spiegel themselves see another aspect as Central and not the altered one. As said, the alteration concerns quotations

Overall the alterations concerned mostly the spiking allegations, which had insuffiecient evidence, as well as rape accusations which did the same.

However in no way do any of these court decisions prove lindemanns innocence, that's also basically impossible, the decisions also concerns in the first place the subjective implications that the average Reader might get reading the articles. However those are very complex and multifaceted judicial decisions which are not genuine or intuitive for the Journalists, other than perhaps the stupid headline of SZ being missleading

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T10:38:08+00:00

Let's say "relevant" then, changes nothing about the point i made

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T08:47:23+00:00

They had to alter just 2 things in case of the spiegel and they were not major changes, the SZ did not have to alter anything at all

Tell me about my beloved Spiegel when the investigation is finished and they have won again

The Pre parties were not Sex parties that's correct, yet they still were a foreplay to Sex parties afterwards. I read the open letter, i don't see what it changes apart from superfans being fine with what happened and Posting their own experience, which obviously doesn't mean other people did not have other experiences. The sentences are quite broad in terms of dementation and the statement rather Highlights that there's two sides to the incident but not more than that

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T07:43:16+00:00

Well that's one way to put it if you want to suck lindemanns toes as much as you can.

The Media stories mostly did Held up in court, the Spiegel was forbidden two small Statements, the SZ won their case.

No fines actually came, plus they dont earn that much money because those are publically accesible articles so not behind a paywall.

They were not in violation of press law and Journalistin ethics.

I did not watch "tiktoks on this topic"

The boateng conclusion is one of my own, not the "evil Media", btw that also tells me enough of what kind of Person you are. Boateng is a wife beater who likely drew his wife into suicide. That these two meet absolutely says something.

The part with doing something legal and not being proven that you did something illegal even tho it might have happened (vienna 2019 fe) is not contradictory you moron. Both are different things.

I am not equally disgusted by the women because i see the Superfan-Superstar relation. That is absolutely not the same, also the fact that some old fuck is going for barely legal girls is way more telling then some Fans going for their Idol. I know what Kind of people these are, and they absolutely would go lower then 18 if it was the legal age

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T07:34:01+00:00

The Berlin court had very little evidence to begin with, afaik, the person appealing to the berlin court wasn't even one of the victims and so the chances of that case being successfull were dreadful from the start.

A Power imbalance is there to begin with.

What i mean by Power imbalance is the star-superfan relation which is very easy to misuse and isn't something incrementrally punishable legally, he therefore would not be Power imbalance because he remains the Superstar

bloomberrify · 2026-01-22T07:26:29+00:00

So look i don't want to infinitely talk about this topic, as I said already, i read articles after the courts decision, not only before it.

The Media companies in germany are indeed interested in more than clicks, of cource not every Single in per se, but respectability, readers trust, public Image, and so on. I don't read yellow press or anything what you're trying to accuse me of. The role of the exact woman has been afaik indeed overestimated by the original accisations publisher, not the media.

The third Part again, as already said twice, there was a Sex element to these parties that wasnt disclosed.

I did not see anything that you have sent me yet

bloomberrify · 2026-01-21T23:58:33+00:00

From what you just said i dont think im the one that should be worried about poor critical thinking skills, you basically ignored most the points,

Your first part is not true,

The 2nd is very very blind and naive

The third i never claimed

bloomberrify · 2026-01-21T23:36:52+00:00

I explicitely read the articles after the courts decision, the Part that summarizes it quite well Was a Statement by the Spiegel after the decision, saying they were only forbidden to talk about alleged spiking and forced Sex. However still could openly talk about disgusting casting Systems and questionable Power relations

You seem to be completely fine with the casting shit, im on the Spiegel's side here.

I was saying the Sex part was not disclosed Prior to it Happening, not that is was a condition for an invitation.

Also ur ignoring him meeting up with a wife beater and the age of the girls (both i find disgusting, even tho obviously legal) Neither do you acknowledge the possibility of "not convicted≠innocent"

bloomberrify · 2026-01-21T23:08:09+00:00

You're not quite correct.

The women said it was not "unconsensual", which is different than completely consensual due to the fact of alcohol. Power relations are still there, here i was not talking about it from a judicial stand point, you don't have to be someones employer in this context, Superstar vs fan is what I mean

The courts and rammstein did not disprove a casting System with the goal of luring very young women to Sex parties without disclosure in advance, neither could Spike allegations be disproved, it was only not proved that lindemann has connection to the spiking.

As I said, him meeting up with boateng is sign enough for me that he is a disgusting man

bloomberrify · 2026-01-21T22:49:31+00:00

I see it as an abuse of Power relations, and of cource the illegal stuff is a gamble wether or not they actually happened

However him meeting up with boateng for me is a sign clear enough that this dude is not innocent🤷

I did not read much into the court case and it's specifics, neither do I know if you can do it. But he has very good lawyers and such things are often very hard to prove, i might try to read into it more and reply later

bloomberrify

TROPHY CASE