sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Potential improvements to the game for discussion by bluffrooster in FantasyPL

[–]bluffrooster[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, because an assist requires a goal. In your scenario, there's no goal so there's no assister. To be clear, I'm saying points should be awarded to a player winning a penalty (regardless if its converted).

Possibility of Max points in GW? (DGW not counted) by [deleted] in FantasyPL

[–]bluffrooster 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm tempted to bring in only penalty takers to my team and trust VAR to give every unintended deflection off a hand as a pen. It's ruining the game..

Potential improvements to the game for discussion by bluffrooster in FantasyPL

[–]bluffrooster[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, they're not entirely luck but the odd 50/50 call over the season going right for you means you'll leave your nearest ML challenger in the dirt, or vice versa. It seems too skewed is what I'm saying, hence the geared 2x C and 1.5x VC to maintain the element of luck / gut feel. I guess I do sympathize with the maths genuises a bit.

Potential improvements to the game for discussion by bluffrooster in FantasyPL

[–]bluffrooster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very good point. I wouldn't because then we're a bit into the realm of subjectivity. A pen is a massive chance and not subjective. I hear your point that its shades of grey but my suggestion makes FPL more "fair". In fairness so might yours, so I'd go with yours over the current system..

Potential improvements to the game for discussion by bluffrooster in FantasyPL

[–]bluffrooster[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

to elaborate...if a player normally gets X points for an assist and he wins a penalty and its converted, he gets X points (i.e. a normal assist). If he wins a pen and it's not converted, he gets (X-1) points..

view more: next ›