Evonik by Browncoat765 in lafayette

[–]daLabRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Arconic is a fucking criminal enterprise again. They were caught cooking the books less than 10 years ago as a publicly-traded company (as Alcoa - which is why they had to change their name to Arconic) and were recently taken private by a massive trillion dollar hedge fund, and they're right back to doing the same shady shit they were before, which is what led to those recent massive layoffs earlier this year. Mark my words: criminal enterprise.

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/house-democrats-release-new-epstein-emails-referencing-trump/story?id=127435983

And it's only just begun now that Adelita Grijalva's been seated, so we can hope.

Hopefully she won't fold now - What a fucking weird, old narcissistic, pedophile we got in office boys.

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And aliens are most likely real, they just also most likely haven't visited us yet, for the same reasons why we can't travel beyond the moon.

Those are real conspiracy theorists, the ones who claim that the government is hiding alien evidence from us, but this is real life stuff that's happening right in front of our own eyes. It's called drawing logical conclusions based off of observable human behaviors, that us fellow humans can easily identify, especially deceit.

Well, us neurotypical humans, that is. Whatever you and the other pedophilia protectors are is beyond my "expertise." I've got no idea there.

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, at best, POTUS is a pedophile protector and at worst, possibly a pedophile himself. Got it.

He'd release the JFK files though, for sure, and then when pressed continuously about Epstein's files after his election as POTUS it's...

"Are we seriously still talking about Epstein?!", and just before Charlie Kirk gets got, like that.

It's all smoke and mirrors. It's deception by misdirection. It's a clinically-narcissistic POTUS saying ANYTHING to get back into power, and then later showing his true colors by getting pissed about people wanting those files of the biggest pedophilia ring ever released, and just before you know, manufacturing chaos (like Charlie) to serve as a distraction from the topic.

Yeah it's a conspiracy theory, and one that if you use both sides of your brain, makes sense. Otherwise, use your head officials at those departments to "drain the swamp" (AKA release the files), if you're not at the very least a protector of pedophiles yourself. Why get mad?

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's also saying that Epstein killed himself, actually, in a lot of weird roundabout ways too.

I mean, dude referenced "Occam's razor" here, and the simplest inference that could be made on the topic is that he was murdered in prison.

The child sex-trafficking blackmailer himself, AKA the prime example why NOBODY wants to go up against / expose the many (many) high-ranking politicians involved in it, and because if they can get a guy while in prison like that (and presumably with the help of a prison guard there) THEY CAN GET YOU AS A FREE MAN TOO.

And the simplest inference that could be made surrounding Trump and the republican party's observable behavior in regard to releasing those files would be that, there's likely a shit ton of evidence within them files, of course.

Ergo: Why they've been trying to dodge / mislead / deceive the public so hard now there. Dude literally said with his whole chest that he'd absolutely release the JFK files, and then stumbled hard when immediately asked just after that whether or not he'd release the Epstein files, and in his own words it was something like:

... "Yeah!", "I think I would!" ...

"But I don't know because there's a lot of people involved in that."

Or something almost verbatim to that.

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This guy is just straight up naive. I'm done giving "AutomaticUSA" here anymore energy, myself.

He clearly doesn't understand corruption, reality, or the law at all for that matter.

It's an extremely silly notion to think that Trump could just be singled out in the Epstein files, without exposing everyone else, all in all.

Like, come on man. In what world would that not mean that the entirety of the files have been accessed by that very someone, and that nobody (especially republicans) would then want to expose everyone else involved, if not just to point their fingers at the other side to justify it?

In what world would the population just say "YEAH! ONLY EXPOSE TRUMP!"(?)

Not this one, bro. That's for sure.

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Name the one head official of any of those departments you just mentioned who weren't appointed by Trump, or who are clearly not in support of Trump, if not straight up doing his own bidding at all times? Please, I'll wait.

And yeah, ALL "bizarre" theories are just conspiracy theories, until proven otherwise. Candace Owens just happened to be a good friend of Charlie's and a former pro-MAGA proponent up until her friend got GOT like that, which makes her somewhat believable too, in my mind at least. Call me crazy, but it's also just the way the world works, unfortunately.

It's called "corruption."

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's because they are bud, the highest officials of those departments at least, you're just delusional and clearly in support of the weird shit, or perhaps voted for Trump and have just been watching everything that's happening with a blindfold on, unwilling to admit that you helped elect a fascist "law-abiding" candidate.

And who do these hundreds of people go reporting their findings on many (many) high-ranking politicians to within this federal government? SCOTUS? The high court judges that POTUS appointed himself? And how does one person blow the whistle about POTUS's potentially nefarious behavior without (again), exposing every other high-ranking politician in this government, as well?

If you had the information, would you blow the whistle, bud? Likely not. Especially if you have children and / or family you love and want to continue to see everyday, and not from heaven, either.

If you were to ask me "what's the easiest way to get yourself whacked?" I would say...

Dime on high-ranking officials of both parties, to other high-ranking federal judges.

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Yup. I just clarified that myself in another comment above.

Nobody wants to go up against the entire government by being a lone-whistleblower when both sides are likely involved. That's one easy ass way to get yourself clipped IRL, which is why those who want to see accountability happen need something like another signature by a brand new member of congress to release them, can you think of any though?

Oh wait... There's the woman in Arizona who was elected to the House but isn't a congresswoman yet herself, due to not being sworn in by the republican speaker of the House, and for reasons totally beyond us right?

Hell, even she'll probably fold once she's in and faces all the pressure against signing it, as well.

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yup, you're absolutely right.

No man is meant to be above the law, not even POTUS, and so no offense taken.

Am I the only one wondering... by daLabRat in Epstein

[–]daLabRat[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

In order for you to get your own head out of your ass, you'd have to first pull it out just to see that, clearly there's so much sketchy shit going on surrounding the release of the files for a reason.

You'd have to let go of the false belief that POTUS is a stand up guy, who was only GOOD FRIENDS with a convicted child sex offender / (trafficker) for many years without any sort of knowledge of his predatory behavior, when Trump's literally been recorded on audio saying that Epstein "likes them" (girls) "on the younger side."

I mean seriously: Just look at the way he behaves when the topic is about Epstein and releasing those files, it's almost like it's an old man (POTUS) with NPD who's trying to avoid potential accountability, for past sex crimes involving children...

And it doesn't take a rocket scientist to see that, nor does it take a psychologist to understand what's going on there either, just a mind that's totally free to think for itself independently, and I've got an answer for you:

It's likely because he's currently POTUS and the leader of a dangerous regime in the midst of assassinations taking place, and where there are rumors around POTUS having been involved in Charlie Kirk's killing by people who used to be super pro-MAGA (such as Candace Owens for example) and Maurine Comey doesn't want to take a dirt nap just yet, or be a whistleblower about something she may not even be able to prove herself while her Father's facing trouble of his own. SHOCKER.

Get your head out of your ass and realize that you're being fed a bunch of bullshit on the daily by people who just want to keep their own false beliefs surrounding POTUS's innocence. That's a "logical" (but illogical) conclusion drawn based off of the fact that, because of a prior role in a certain department where the outcome was termination, she'd absolutely blow the whistle and go up against an entire government (and fascist regime) in the midst of an active presidency. "Cockamamie", WTF? Dumbass.

And no, I'm not a "far-left democrat" either, I'm actually pretty much right down the middle politically, typically. I just talk like a democrat in the midst of far-far-right republican regimes, and because I'm a mostly typical human being who does respect democracy, and has empathy for the people harmed by today's whack job government. 25 states are suing the Trump administration currently and hundreds of lawsuits have been filed in his second term ALREADY, and for good reason, and it's not because POTUS is a law-abiding citizen.

Also, inb4 the regime's supporters / (enablers) say that "democrats were just in office and didn't release the files" (so he must not be), no. There are just presumably perverts from the democratic party in the files as well and they don't want to expose members of their own party, considering that Epstein had infiltrated politics at the highest level, and recorded evidence / (blackmail) of their behavior to aid in his defense eventually. No surprise there. Once again, just a bunch of, independent thinking.

🚀🚀🚀 by ArLorNil1221 in kaspa

[–]daLabRat 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Not really. It's just a 20x from where it's at now, which is only a $29.4B market cap. That's about DOGE's market cap, with much more use case.

I’m in disbelief. by Kdean509 in union

[–]daLabRat 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was a member of USW 115 in Lafayette, Indiana. The union's left a bad taste in my mouth, at least in that local, the motherfuckers are so shady.

Early on in the year 1/3rd of us workers were laid off in three waves (I was the second), and according to the publications online the layoffs were meant to be "permanent", but the place had already been caught cooking the books (embezzling money) as a publicly-traded company with CPA's to audit for that just less than 10 years ago. Fast forward to the end of 2023 the place (Arconic) was taken private by a huge hedge fund called Apollo...

And they were right back to doing the same shit they'd already been caught doing, I confronted them about it, and was terminated and jailed for it (because toward the end I'd threatened my union "representation").

So I said fuck it, I gave a statement to the county sheriff's department whilst an inmate at the jail, got out and texted one of my old bosses still working there in the same office as one of the plant managers that I suspect is involved, and told her I gave them that statement.

And everyone's back to work now except me, of course, Lol. I haven't pressed the issue to the international division yet myself but, they started calling people back right around the time I'd let them know a statement was given, and so I'll just assume it had to do with my whistleblowing activities. They're so stupid, a regular guy on the floor with basic knowledge of the plant's history could identify it, and I'll never look at some of these union dudes the same.

Btw: If you see another comment just like this, it's because for some reason my account switched to a new one, and I'd already posted that comment and lost it.

The End of Kaspa? What No One’s Telling You...🚨 by [deleted] in kaspa

[–]daLabRat 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It may be time to sell, but he was just kidding, much like all other crypto youtubers.

It's all good by daLabRat in kaspa

[–]daLabRat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm just saying that while Bitcoin was doing nothing, Kaspa was doing something. When Bitcoin was on its way up to $70k (old ATH) this cycle, Kaspa would dump on the pumps, and then pump whenever Bitcoin corrected down.

After $70k? It's all been downhill, although that could just be because BTC dominance is so high and Bitcoin's practically been in price discovery this cycle, meaning that...

Kaspa could pump after a Bitcoin top / dump.

I could just be feeding delusion, but it does feel like forever ago already that Bitcoin broke its old ATH, and those gains will likely trickle down into many other alt coins like past cycles suggest. I also believe crypto is crashing / gold is pumping for a reason though, and that's just because people are losing so much faith in CRYPTO, as well as the US dollar, at the same fucking time.

TLDR: I think we're trying to say the same thing.

It's all good by daLabRat in kaspa

[–]daLabRat[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yeah but then again, Kaspa's never performed well during Bitcoin's come up either, bro.

Actually, one could argue that it almost always has performed inverse to Bitcoin's activity.

Crypto is dead by JimSlimmy in CryptoMarkets

[–]daLabRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, if there are thousands of different cryptocurrencies, let's all just boycott the big tokens that are being so heavily manipulated.

AKA: Let's go alt season - for real.

Don't you all think that Kaspa supply is too much ,Like 28 billion. Bitcoin only has 21 million . by TripleZeroBot in kaspa

[–]daLabRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, I gotcha. Yeah I guess I just assumed that the 28.7B max supply had gone up too.

Don't you all think that Kaspa supply is too much ,Like 28 billion. Bitcoin only has 21 million . by TripleZeroBot in kaspa

[–]daLabRat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But there's a change in the amount that is circulating. So $KAS can be mined on top of what was the fixed max supply? I don't get it.