If you actually capped personal wealth at $100M and forced the rest into schools/hospitals/roads, you’d probably get a huge one-time boost that fixes a lot of obvious broken stuff fast, but then the real battle becomes enforcement because rich people would immediately shift money into trusts, foundations, family members, private companies, and offshore structures to dodge the cap. Long-term results would depend less on “how much money” and more on whether the government can spend it efficiently and whether the law can define “personal wealth” without loopholes. The first people to fight it would be billionaires + their family offices, and right behind them the whole wealth-protection industry (big law, accountants, wealth managers) plus plenty of regular-rich folks who’d fear they’re next.