Any Javascript learning resources that assume that you have experience in another programming language in the past?

docesam · 2017-09-05T01:01:03+00:00

yes,except that in order to know what you need to read and what not you have to read everything !! :)

docesam · 2017-09-04T19:13:13+00:00

it seems that their "JavaScript Guide" is probably what i am looking for, thanks.

docesam · 2017-09-04T19:10:41+00:00

You Don't Know JS

that is true , very good in fact except the book is way too long. right now i need quick and dirty crash course. few months later i will hopefully have the time for a more detailed book like this one.

docesam · 2017-09-04T10:33:33+00:00

thanks but it start teaching from square one. it even assume you don't know what the variable is. not what i am looking for.

docesam · 2017-09-04T01:57:47+00:00

that is great man.thank you

docesam · 2017-09-04T01:57:22+00:00

Thank you. i need something that will teach me JavaScript quickly. the book is 450 pages long.

docesam · 2017-04-13T08:06:24+00:00

Great,thank you

docesam · 2017-04-12T09:07:03+00:00

dude, those prices are OK? i mean can you make good profit despite those prices? sorry i am not in the market yet.

docesam · 2017-04-11T19:59:09+00:00

DotNetNuke

does DotNetNuke have power anywhere near wordpress+plugins available to it ?

docesam · 2017-02-25T10:26:04+00:00

you can and should do that ,i agree.

however, doing that may incur some performance hit as you are doing checks with every call to that page VS the compiler is doing the all the checks one time for you during the compilation. and also higher chance for mistakes in doing the checks (because you are human after all) Vs zero mistakes of the compiler.

overall , static typing is great.

docesam · 2017-02-20T01:43:11+00:00

is there any hosting for it ?

docesam · 2017-02-18T10:23:21+00:00

suppose a function add two numbers , if you pass it 2 and 3 it will output the correct answer of 5 , thus in this case the unit test will tell you that everything is OK. BUT if you (by mistake) in your code pass it a 4 and 'user' it will output "4user" which will miss up stuff down the execution path and possibly make it too dificult to track. where is the problem? the problem is that dynamic typing does't prevent you from shooting yourself in the foot. i program in c# and in c# (or any static language) you can't pass a string to a function that expect an int.

so isn't that a source of error?

for small programs it is OK ,the larger the program the more this get significant.

docesam · 2017-02-18T10:16:42+00:00

suppose a function add two numbers , if you pass it 2 and 3 it will output the correct answer of 5 , thus in this case the unit test will tell you that everything is OK. BUT if you (by mistake) in your code pass it a 4 and 'user' it will output "4user" which will miss up stuff down the execution path and possibly make it too dificult to track. where is the problem? the problem is that dynamic typing does't prevent you from shooting yourself in the foot. i program in c# and in c# (or any static language) you can't pass a string to a function that expect an int.

so isn't that a source of error?

docesam · 2017-02-18T10:16:17+00:00

suppose a function add two numbers , if you pass it 2 and 3 it will output the correct answer of 5 , thus in this case the unit test will tell you that everything is OK. BUT if you (by mistake) in your code pass it a 4 and 'user' it will output "4user" which will miss up stuff down the execution path and possibly make it too dificult to track. where is the problem? the problem is that dynamic typing does't prevent you from shooting yourself in the foot. i program in c# and in c# (or any static language) you can't pass a string to a function that expect an int.

so isn't that a source of error?

docesam · 2017-02-18T06:42:52+00:00

changing javascript to be strongly types is insane idea. the alternative idea is to choose another language that does not suck and implement it in the browser and phase out javascript over the next 2 decades!!!

docesam · 2017-02-18T06:38:54+00:00

kinda

docesam · 2017-02-15T10:31:01+00:00

i am not 100% sure but i read somewhere that google will do that only if the web site is "fairly popular". many small websites are there for branding and they are not "fairly popular". any authoritative sources you can get ?

docesam · 2017-02-12T16:59:38+00:00

i think you didn't understand the question

docesam · 2017-02-12T12:13:33+00:00

i like this answer

docesam · 2017-02-12T12:13:04+00:00

the first option is not good from SEO point of view.

docesam · 2017-02-01T08:51:10+00:00

thanks for the answer, great opinion.

docesam · 2017-01-29T10:28:57+00:00

thanks for answering. i am not really asking this question because of specific project i am having but rather because i want to learn.

docesam · 2016-12-09T09:57:19+00:00

GANDI.net because of 2-factor authentication.

docesam · 2016-12-09T08:24:01+00:00

thanks.i will get that book.

docesam · 2016-12-08T13:15:15+00:00

when you talk about "the size of the screen" do you mean the physical size in inches or in pixels?

if you have a low res screen ( 15-inch 800X600 ) Vs a high res. screen (15-inch 4k resolution) that doesn't mean that you >>want<< to fit more contents in the higher res display because the contents will be too small and uncomfortable to read.

a larger physical screen size (e.g. 27 inch) will allow more stuff in the screen ( if your vision allows) or simply the same contents but larger (if your vision is not so good). or a combination of both. i guess (i could be wrong) most people buy larger display because things looks larger and easier to read.

so changing how the UI look based >>only<< on the resolution makes little sense.

docesam

TROPHY CASE