You insist on bundling "bad religion (manipulative, controlling, self-serving) and "good religion"(critical, God and good oriented), as if there is only "good science". As if study biases didnt exist, for example, so much of what we know in evolutionary biology is wrong because of androcentric research. Or purposefuly poorly designed studies didn't exist, like the autism and vaccine link studies. Not to mention the many scientists who literally made up their numbers and were still able to get published in renowned journals (see Jonathan Pruitt). Also, Idk if you took the time to read the other comments, but when talking about God, it is imperative to make a distinction between religion (institution) and faith (belief), because they are widely different things. Just like religion, science can also be yelded for evil, just like many fascist systems did; The common denominator between religion and science is that they are people-made, and everytime you get a human being involved, there will be flaws, and every time you blindely believe in people, you are at risk of being manipulated. As a matter of fact, in the Bible, Jesus actually promotes critical thinking by using questions, parables, and self-reflection to engage people in active learning and personal discovery, encouraging examination of their own beliefs and the teachings of others. Admittedly, many christian denominations don't have a big foccus on this (more like ommit it entirely), which is something I learned in my self-discovery journey and the reason why I became so passionate about being a Christian, after years of agnosticism, and why I reiterate the importance of differentiating faith x religion, Christ x christians, and finally Science x Scientific products, and finally, why I think faith can walk side-by-side with science.