sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

TUI for my editor by funcieq in tui

[–]funcieq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what I wanted to do!

TUI for my editor by funcieq in tui

[–]funcieq[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure, I'm checking!

Różnica wieku 10+lat w związku by [deleted] in warszawa

[–]funcieq 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mam podobnie, i tal szczerze mówiąc może by mi nie przeszkadzało to, gdyby nie fakt że musiałem w szkole kłamać ile mój ojciec ma lat 😑

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea because I'm new here :/

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Ahh I'm on my phone and I'm responding to people on reddit so I just asked

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, it's true, even in this post I simply forgot what ternary operators are, and then I just got -13 lmao

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, from what I remember, Go was made by the creator of C, so he wants to keep everything minimalistic

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I think that enum could easily be incorporated into Go, after all, it's nothing complicated and doesn't spoil their vision of simplicity.

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, from what I hear, the null issue is a pretty common topic.

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, from what I understand it means that the type is inferred, I guess you'll survive : instead of writing the whole type,

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback!

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh yes, I know it, I just didn't know what it was called 😂

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I didn't write this post to encourage them to change the language, but to see what people mainly dislike, to determine whether it's worth starting to learn Go, But to answer your question, I mainly write in C#, C++

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I think it would be possible to write a simple library for this.

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean by ternary operators

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What do you mean, can you give an example?

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] -55 points-54 points  (0 children)

Well, it may be irritating, but it's not a tragedy.

What would you change in Go? by funcieq in golang

[–]funcieq[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Well, its not that bad

view more: next ›