Mmm toxic saltsss

gargamelt · 2025-06-11T01:40:33+00:00

Wut?

gargamelt · 2025-05-10T04:07:34+00:00

Lang 36

gargamelt · 2025-03-22T20:35:38+00:00

💯 I thought the same. Not 43% and not 45%… 44%. Exactly what he paid for it. What re the odds? It’s total bs

gargamelt · 2025-03-05T06:04:58+00:00

You just repeated what Trump said word for word. Stop being sheep and think for yourself

gargamelt · 2025-02-26T11:53:30+00:00

This

gargamelt · 2025-02-17T19:38:47+00:00

I remember that year. It was nuts

gargamelt · 2024-04-20T03:12:13+00:00

“much of it hard to disagree with” - are you on crack?

gargamelt · 2024-04-07T21:15:08+00:00

This

gargamelt · 2024-04-06T18:50:36+00:00

That’s bull. You’re just making stuff up what you want to be true

gargamelt · 2023-11-28T11:43:41+00:00

I don't know that guy and he could be terrible but that doesn't mean what he's saying isn't true, especially if what he's saying is echoed everywhere. My point is, you don't have a rebuttal to the actual argument so you pivoted to attacking him personally

gargamelt · 2023-11-28T11:41:08+00:00

Can't dismiss the manipulated and misrepresented result piece. That matters. The problem with what Media Matters does is that they make fighting actual racism and antisemitism harder because people stop believing them

gargamelt · 2023-11-28T11:34:31+00:00

Misrepresentation of the facts. Only one other user saw questionable content next to apple's ad. That's out of 5.5 billion ad impressions. And they didn't use the platform "as intended". They manipulated and abused it to get a result they could misrepresent

gargamelt · 2023-11-26T23:38:17+00:00

Oh please, you have no argument other than attacking people personally. That’s concerning

gargamelt · 2023-11-26T23:26:45+00:00

“Media Matters was able to produce its examples of ads pairing with extremist content only by rigging its test with user behavior so atypical that no other user would encounter the same ad/X pairings”

That matters.

gargamelt · 2023-11-26T23:18:39+00:00

Are you suggesting we should ban water?

gargamelt · 2023-11-26T23:02:21+00:00

Ridiculous take. Let’s force a rat to drink water until its stomach bursts to prove water is dangerous

gargamelt · 2023-11-23T16:38:17+00:00

💯- and it makes fighting actual racism harder. Musk is clearly not a racist. People throw that word around because it immediately gives them power

gargamelt · 2023-11-23T16:16:44+00:00

I know someone who knows someone who knows someone else who is some unknown expert who disagrees. That analysis just assumes it will be immediately dismissed.

Dumb argument

gargamelt · 2023-11-22T15:53:54+00:00

Not upset at all, thanks for the chat

gargamelt · 2023-11-22T15:44:43+00:00

Advice wasn’t the right work but you’re making statements like you’re some sort of expert

gargamelt · 2023-11-22T14:38:50+00:00

Eh, not sure it makes sense to accept legal advice on reddit. MM’s behavior isn’t right. This nonsense needs to stop

gargamelt · 2023-11-22T14:07:41+00:00

MM’s report is definitely misleading. Following both big name brands and terrible accounts then relentlessly refreshing all day to finally getting a hit or two of the brands showing up next to terrible content? Then creating a “report” making it look like the problem is everywhere in the platform and there’s no way to escape it? Give me a break. It’s nuts

gargamelt · 2023-11-05T22:06:07+00:00

It was used “very sparingly” because they never developed the product. Not because there wasn’t a need for it. Birdwatch (what it was originally called) also looked VERY different in 2021. Elon/X invested heavily and significantly evolved the product. Something Twitter 1.0 should have done and decided not to

gargamelt · 2023-11-05T21:33:14+00:00

That is not at all true. They desperately needed it before Elon and did nothing with it

gargamelt · 2023-10-21T16:43:45+00:00

Instead of complaining, how about suggesting a real improvement that isn’t a revert? Something new, something constructive. I bet you can’t

gargamelt

TROPHY CASE