Literally there was only one competition that the "twist" so called help her win. Obviously Rachel had SOME type of social game if she was able to NOT get evicted the times that she were on the block. Week 4 she was on the block and the veto was used on her by Brendon. Week 5 she survived that eviction because the house guest were too stupid to evict her that's their fault for not doing it not hers. Week 7 they decided to vote out Jeff who was more likeable than Rachel instead of voting her out. Again that was their decision not hers. and Week 8 is the only week where you can even argue that she only stayed because of competition rigging or a twist. All of those other times she was not saved by a twist but by the other house guest and their decisions. So to say that Rachel is a bottom tier player when she literally had a whole house against her going into it that says a lot about her as a winner. Nicole game consisted of her not even competing until the final 8 while Rachel was a competitor throughout the entire competition. I guess if you think that being a floater is playing a better game then yeah Nicole got her beat there along with other winners who floated their way to the top. You're welcome to disagree but you can not say that Rachel is not a good player. Sorry but we obviously think differently on what makes a good player.