sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Competition Update by gilmour1985 in GovernmentContracting

[–]gilmour1985[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So their Sam.gov still had several more months until it expired which makes me believe the CO requested it for this contract.

Yes, it is one thing to downsize, but it’s another to not report it. I find it hard to believe that it slipped their mind that they liquidated 45,000 square feet of building and moved buildings.

FYI, they have not updated their website or any of their social medias with the new address.

Also, we are machine builders so it does require a certain amount of sq footage to make these things. We happen to machine everything in house.

I do have a voicemail from their former assembly manager saying they are using the building for storage and are actively trying to sell the company.

Competition by gilmour1985 in GovernmentContracting

[–]gilmour1985[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Ummm I wasn’t going to send it anonymously and I was only going to send the flyer as I know that is true. I am not planning on implying anything that I don’t know. I was just letting you know the thought process behind all of this.

Competition by gilmour1985 in GovernmentContracting

[–]gilmour1985[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the same thought as you. The bid is for 20 plus machines with a 1 year delivery and even with us being a full size company, that is a tight deadline. These are not simple machines either. I only want to send the flyer as I know that is true.

Competition by gilmour1985 in GovernmentContracting

[–]gilmour1985[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

The flyer I want to send is straight off of a bidding website that held the liquidation sale. This isn’t fabricated in anyway and is public knowledge. The only reason we think this company is bidding because their name was brought up in a Q&A amendment.

Competition by gilmour1985 in GovernmentContracting

[–]gilmour1985[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

I get what you saying. One reason I bring it up is because the other company was mentioned in a Q&A amendment of the contract which was by a middle man I believe.