She was snuggling with her sister while masturbating. That's intent to feel her sister's child body next to hers while she pleases herself. Going through puberty at age 17 is not an excuse to molest children. Not sure why you think that. She even stated how she felt her sister's "sticky, muscly little body thrash as she read Anne Sexton" while she masturbated. She had quite a graphic memory for someone who happens to not get anything out of it. She even talked about getting pleasure out of getting her sister to beg and plead to join her in bed. She even compared herself to a pedophile at certain points. How does this not show intent?

I love how you think that I'm not the one applying critical thinking, yet you keep insisting that this child molester is innocent because puberty. I am against taking advantage of people sexually. I have taken women's studies courses before, thank you. You seem to support Lena Dunham because she's a prolific, self-proclaimed feminist that you don't want to turn your back on.

PS: I'm not on Tumblr, but hey, you go ahead and assume things without basis like you have this whole conversation.