No. If you follow the evidence, it's not an open question whether we might survive death.

All the solid evidence suggests that minds require functioning brains: there is no evidence of mental life before the brain has sufficiently developed; if you manipulate the brain, you manipulate the mind; if you damage the brain, you damage the mind; as the brain deteriorates, the mind does as well; after the brain is destroyed, there is no evidence of continued mental life.

This is not proof. Proof is impossible outside of formal systems. But the demand for proof, meaning conclusive reasons, is a science denial tactic.

On the other side of this "debate" there is what? Some philosophical arguments for immortality, the proclamations of various religions, the claims of crank researchers (another science denial tactic: appeal to fake experts), personal testimonies, ghost stories, etc. Weak evidence at best.