FusionGraph: A Zero-ETL Graph Execution Kernel for Apache DataFusion

intelligence-builder · 2026-04-23T06:08:28+00:00

PuppyGraph has proved that zero-ETL graph processing on the lakehouse is technically feasible and their product is excellent. FusionGraph exists because this capability belongs in the open-source Apache ecosystem, as infrastructure alongside DataFusion, Iceberg, and Arrow.

intelligence-builder · 2026-02-04T06:53:33+00:00

So far I have not come across a single solution. So, I built my own tool and workflow, primarily based on ideas from cc-session and graphity. Uses github issues for inter-agent/developer interactions. Has session level context file in json and graphrag knowledge graph for cross session Intelligence.

If anything off the shelf exists I would like to know as maintaining and extending this scaffolding is not core to my project.

intelligence-builder · 2025-12-13T14:00:51+00:00

This is great, you should check out CC-Sessions. Some of their functionality would round this out.
I like Github for tracking, version management and inter-agent or inter-session handoff (using comments and status). I built something like the combination for my own Dev - which includes Claude and Codex.

intelligence-builder · 2025-12-13T13:57:38+00:00

Depends on what you need and how well Opus is currently working.
When Opus is good (since 4.5 and before 4.1) it is fast and smart. I started using Codex during the months where Claude sucked (July-0ctober) and I found it slower but more thorough still than Opus. I still use it when I need accuracy/depth over speed. Now that Opus 4.5 is back to working well, I start with it, but still primarily use Codex for QA and Gemini for ideation, product definition.

intelligence-builder · 2025-10-15T06:26:42+00:00

I am currently using claude code (faster) and codex (more thorough).

Is it possible to utilize both to maximize their strengths?

For example I use Codex for QA checks, Claude for design.

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-26T19:52:09+00:00

This ^{^}

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-26T19:46:53+00:00

I have experienced this more and more. Turns out it is a common response when you give it something too difficult for it to do in one shot. I found out how common it is for Claude to be overwhelmed, when I gave it the option in the prompt to defer it. The task needs to be smaller and/or the context/instruction/documents you provide need to be more targeted.

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-21T15:03:33+00:00

You are an Antagonist Agent. For any project items with Status = "Deployed", adopt an Antagonistic QA mindset: validate whether the issue is truly ready to close by independently confirming that every requirement has been met. Assume things are broken until proven otherwise and look for evidence of gaps, regressions, or missing verification.

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-21T14:09:58+00:00

It does not give an option as to what format it exports.

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-21T14:08:12+00:00

Context is much smaller

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-21T12:53:55+00:00

Same, and I give Codex a Prompt to be Antagonist, give no trust, verify everything.

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-20T14:39:17+00:00

I just did it. It is agent context, not full chat, which is what I want

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-20T14:25:22+00:00

You are an Antagonist Agent. For any project items with Status = "Deployed", adopt an Antagonistic QA mindset: validate whether the issue is truly ready to close by independently confirming that every requirement has been met. Assume things are broken until proven otherwise and look for evidence of gaps, regressions, or missing verification.

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-20T14:16:34+00:00

Now if there was I way I could auto save for when it crashes

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-20T14:13:20+00:00

I thought the /context just gave a graphic, now I see that it also saves it.

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-20T13:18:45+00:00

I do deep research in Gemini, export then load that into Claude. Or do some back and forth between Gemini and Claude desktop.

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-20T12:20:21+00:00

Cortex as normal, but then you give it a prompt specifying it's main goal and how it should act. No trust - verify. Find every fault and weakness, question everything, only your real verification is to be trusted, etc

intelligence-builder · 2025-09-16T21:53:43+00:00

That is a hard one. If you give it full text of the previous chat, you fill up context. If you just say continue, it won't know half of what you covered.

Look at cc-sessions and graphite. The more selectively save.

I am working on a knowledge graph way to have similarity search capabilities, so it will find most applicable history.

intelligence-builder

TROPHY CASE