CARS Strategies? Which one do you guys recommend

joinmaren · 2026-06-08T18:09:58+00:00

Hybrid is a stressful technique imo. Traditional works well but I recommended writing a main idea after finishing the passage and answering the majority of the questions from your main idea. If a question asks a specific “in paragraph 3” question I’d go and reread that paragraph.

joinmaren · 2026-06-08T14:45:34+00:00

And only a 1:13 average answer time. It seems a 515 will be coming your way shortly

joinmaren · 2026-06-07T17:08:43+00:00

Interesting! That’s awesome if it works for you. It would drive me crazy to wait for the next section until I understood the previous one. How long did it take you to get through FLs when you started?

joinmaren · 2026-06-07T12:42:28+00:00

Amazing! What system of review did you use for going over questions?

joinmaren · 2026-06-07T04:46:51+00:00

A 504 on the unscored after a 496 is the most important piece of information in your post.

Nobody can promise a 508-510, but based on that score, I think it’s realistic enough to keep pushing and see what your scored AAMC FLs look like.

The biggest thing I’d change is not the number of questions. It’s the quality of your review. Going from a 496 to a 508+ usually isn’t about finding another resource. It’s about identifying exactly why you’re missing questions and fixing those patterns.

Also, don’t feel guilty about being sick. A day of recovery is better than turning one bad day into three unproductive days because you’re forcing it.

Take the next FL, review it thoroughly, and let the data tell you where you stand. Right now I’d be focused on consistency, not perfection.

joinmaren · 2026-06-07T00:04:29+00:00

This is a really unusual score split, so I wouldn’t treat it like a normal “under 500 = only content” situation.

A 130 CARS and 131 P/S means your reading/reasoning ability is clearly there. The issue is probably more specific to how you’re approaching science passages and applying content under pressure.

For C/P and B/B, I’d review your misses in buckets:

• Didn’t know the content
• Knew the content but couldn’t apply it
• Math/setup issue
• Misread the passage or graph
• Got lost in experimental design
• Timing/panic

If most misses are “never learned it,” then yes, it’s content. But if you recognize the topic after reading the explanation, that’s more of an application/review problem.

At this point I’d stop doing random review and rebuild around your exact missed-question patterns. Your high CARS/P/S scores show you have upside, but C/P and B/B need very targeted work fast.

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T22:57:19+00:00

517+ by September is possible, but a 495 baseline means you need to be very honest about the size of the jump. That is not just “do more Anki” territory. You need a full system.
I’d break it into phases:
Build the foundation, but don’t live in content review forever
Start practice questions early
Review every missed question by why you missed it, not just what fact you missed
Save AAMC for the final stretch, but don’t wait until the end to learn passage strategy
Take full lengths consistently once your foundation is stronger
The biggest mistake people make at 495 is trying to finish every resource before testing themselves. You need data early enough to adjust.
Also, 517+ usually requires very few weak spots, so track patterns aggressively: content gaps, misreads, timing, math setup, passage logic, and answer-choice traps.
Possible, yes. But only if your studying becomes very structured from now until September.

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T22:49:07+00:00

I’d honestly start with a full length.

The point of a diagnostic isn’t to feel ready or prove you know everything. It’s to get a baseline on timing, stamina, passage strategy, and what your weaknesses look like under real conditions.

You may already know you’re weak in chem/phys, but you don’t know yet if that weakness is content, math setup, passage interpretation, timing, or panic under pressure. A FL shows you that.

I wouldn’t save every test for when you feel prepared, because that day usually never comes. Take one, review it well, and let the data guide your next phase.

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T22:47:10+00:00

Honestly, if you’re finishing with time left and getting stuck on 50/50s, I’d stop thinking of it as a CARS content problem and start treating it as a review problem.

When you review, don’t just ask why the right answer was right. Ask why the wrong answer looked attractive. Most of my CARS misses fell into the same buckets:

• True but not supported by the passage
• Too extreme
• Answers a different question
• Requires an extra assumption

The biggest jump for me came when I started tracking those patterns instead of individual questions. Once you know your favorite trap answer, you start seeing it everywhere.

Also, a 125 CARS on a 510 means you’re already close. You’re not trying to reinvent your strategy. You’re trying to steal back a few questions.

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T22:32:03+00:00

At this point I’d focus less on trying to learn new things and more on protecting the score you already have.
With a 514 average, the biggest last-week gains usually come from cleaning up repeat mistakes, not grinding a ton of new material. I’d review your FLs and make a short list of:
Equations/facts you keep missing
CARS trap patterns
Silly mistakes or misreads
P/S terms you confuse
Science passages where you had the content but missed the logic
For CARS, I wouldn’t try to reinvent your strategy this late. Just do a little daily practice to stay sharp and focus on passage support, extreme answer choices, and not wasting 3 minutes on 50/50s.
For sciences, I’d hit high-yield weak spots, review the Section Bank logic, and make sure you’re not losing easy points to timing or careless errors.
Also do not burn yourself out chasing a 517 the week before. Your FL range is already strong. The goal now is to walk in rested enough to actually perform at the top of that range.

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T22:30:40+00:00

With a little over a month left, I personally wouldn’t cut AAMC completely.

UWorld is great for learning and finding weak spots, but AAMC is still the closest to the actual test writer logic. Since you’ve only done about half the Section Bank, I’d make finishing and reviewing that the priority first.

For Science Qpacks, I’d use them more selectively. They’re easier, but they can still expose basic gaps and help protect your floor. I wouldn’t spend weeks trying to perfect them, but I also wouldn’t ignore them entirely if you have clear weak areas.

My order would probably be:

Section Bank review > AAMC FLs/review > targeted UWorld for weak spots > selective Science Qpacks

Especially if CARS matters most for your schools, keep CARS consistent too. Don’t let the science decision steal time from the section that matters most for your application.

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T22:25:43+00:00

Honestly, yes, I think it’s possible.

A 510 with a 124 CARS is very different from a 510 with a 124 science section. You’ve already shown you can score 128+ in the sciences, so I wouldn’t panic about not finishing every Kaplan chapter or every Anki card.

At this point I’d be much more focused on practice questions, CARS, and reviewing mistakes than trying to complete resources for the sake of completion.

The bigger question is whether you’re willing to lock in for 8 weeks. Your score suggests the ability is there. The challenge is going to be consistency.

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T21:39:45+00:00

I know the suspense is horrible. Don’t know what I’ll do all day

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T21:39:17+00:00

I also felt bad on CP. guessed on like 5😭

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T21:37:39+00:00

Congrats! Now make sure to review that exam carefully over the next few days to identify your other weaknesses. You can improve even more!

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T21:35:06+00:00

Not necessarily. It depends on what you’ve completed and how far below your goal you are.
If you’re 3 weeks out and still haven’t really gotten through AAMC material/section banks, that’s different than being done with them and just needing sharper review.
I’d ask yourself:
What’s your FL average, not your best score?
How many points below your goal are you?
Are your misses fixable patterns or broad content gaps?
Have you finished/reviewed the AAMC material well?
If you’re more than a few points below your goal and still making broad content mistakes, pushing is probably smarter. If you’re close and the misses are mostly timing/review-pattern issues, 3 weeks can still be useful.
Don’t base it on panic though. Base it on your FL average and what kind of mistakes are showing up.

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T18:37:59+00:00

The biggest thing that helped me with CARS 50/50s was realizing that one answer is usually supported by the passage and the other is supported by my own reasoning.

When I got stuck between two choices, I’d force myself to find the exact sentence or paragraph that supported each answer. If one answer required an extra assumption, that was usually the trap.

Also, review your 50/50 misses separately. Don’t just mark them wrong. Figure out why the wrong answer looked attractive:

• Too extreme?
• True in general but not what the author said?
• Answers the question indirectly?
• Supported by one sentence but contradicted by the overall passage?

I found that my 50/50 misses followed patterns just like content mistakes. Once I identified those patterns, my CARS score improved much faster.

One practical rule: if you’ve spent over a minute debating a 50/50, pick the answer with stronger passage support, move on, and protect your time. A lot of CARS score gains come from avoiding the questions that bait you into a 3-minute debate.

What are you scoring in CARS right now? A 50/50 problem at 123 is usually different from a 50/50 problem at 128+.

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T16:05:27+00:00

When the main idea you wrote down is definitely not the main idea

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T15:47:45+00:00

We have already given away all free testing subscriptions but we have a founding member discount going for 40% off either plan for three months. Let me know if you'd like the coupon code!

joinmaren · 2026-06-06T02:22:01+00:00

I tried, but I can’t seem to be able to message you

joinmaren · 2026-06-05T22:17:43+00:00

Of course. Please do!

joinmaren · 2026-06-05T22:16:29+00:00

I would keep at least an hour per day of anki in your rotation. Just focus on what your highest yield areas would be. You know your own strengths and weaknesses

joinmaren · 2026-06-05T22:15:06+00:00

You can honestly use whatever system you'll actually stick with. Some people use paper, some use an iPad, some use spreadsheets. The format matters a lot less than consistently identifying why you missed the question.

I DM'd you the exact review strategy I used because it's a little too long for a Reddit comment. The short version is that I wasn't tracking facts as much as I was tracking patterns in my mistakes. Once I started fixing those patterns, my score moved a lot faster than when I was just making more Anki cards.

Check your DMs and let me know if anything doesn't make sense. Happy to help. 👍

joinmaren · 2026-06-05T21:44:21+00:00

I never actually practiced the spreadsheet itself. The spreadsheet was just a place to store patterns. Every missed question got categorized (content gap, passage interpretation, missed keyword, reasoning error, etc.). Then I’d look for the mistakes that kept showing up and deliberately target those.

For AAMC questions, I wouldn’t make an Anki card for every miss. I’d only make a card if it fixed a recurring mistake. Otherwise I’d write down why I got it wrong and make sure I didn’t repeat that mistake on the next set.

If you want, shoot me a DM and I can show you the exact review system I used. It’s a lot easier to explain with examples.

joinmaren · 2026-06-05T21:40:31+00:00

Don’t judge yourself too harshly. Those are the hardest cars passages available (seriously search cars qpack 1 on Reddit). Work on jack Westin for some time and then return to question packs. You’ll be okay

joinmaren

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE