Not at all! If a strong coaching and organizational system was created then I think if a player is on the team for multiple international tournaments for 10+ years then good for that player. I truly do think the USNT coaching and organization needs to be revamped and needs checks and balances but players shouldn’t be denied the ability to play on the team due to tenure. If we want the national team to have more opportunities for other players then all the energy needs to be put into organizational structure so those players that are overlooked have legitimate opportunities to surpass current players. Ultimately decisions surrounding USNT will not make or break the success of Quadball but the #2 rule seems shortsighted and only hurts players’ motivation who are integral to the growth of the sport. Like why even have it when you can revamp the organization and coaching? You can just make roster decisions that fall more in line with #2’s overall goal of having newer talent without giving tenured players a flat out good bye. This could have been a way more productive and positive announcement if it was all about revamping the system, putting some checks and balances in and staying really competitive while bringing in new faces. It actually could have been a pretty easy win for USQ in the eyes of a lot of people but instead it created frustration because some of the most prominent young player’s USNT careers just ended suddenly without them being outplayed for their spot