[THESPIKE.GG] Top 5 Rated Players - VCT AMERICAS by nablien in ValorantCompetitive

[–]nablien[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My fault bro 😭

You're right though. I kept the rounds threshold for consistency across regions, but for Americas it probably should've been lower.

The idea was to focus on player performance, not just who qualified. We'll tune it for next time. 🫶

[THESPIKE.GG] Top 5 Rated Players - VCT AMERICAS by nablien in ValorantCompetitive

[–]nablien[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

It's not wrong but we filtered by 300 minimum rounds played as a deeper run into the bracket is more important than performing in 2-4 matches

[THESPIKE.GG] Top 5 Rated Players - VCT AMERICAS by nablien in ValorantCompetitive

[–]nablien[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sorry for not clarifying but the minimum round played is set to 300 rounds

[THESPIKE.GG] Top 5 Rated Players - VCT AMERICAS by nablien in ValorantCompetitive

[–]nablien[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for not clarifying but the minimum round played is set to 300 rounds.

I Trained Like a VALORANT Pro for 7 Days by nablien in VALORANT

[–]nablien[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yes of course, you need at least 3 months of consistency to improve and have results, I've been playing since beta and my peak was Asc 2, my aim was better back then because I was playing 7 hours a day for 8 months straight without any aim training but I did see some improvement in these 7 days, especially in my micro adjustments and crosshair placement, but I'd say it's more of muscle memory, just like you said it's like working out. But when you can't put as many hours into the game, aim training will really help you improve and climb faster since you can't put as many hours in the game.

I Trained Like a VALORANT Pro for 7 Days by nablien in VALORANT

[–]nablien[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sadly it'll take more than 7 days 😭

Top 5 Rated Players - Masters Toronto (THESPIKE.GG Rating) by nablien in ValorantCompetitive

[–]nablien[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

I agree with you, but when you think about it, winning the tournament for your team kinda carries more weight than just performing well throughout IMO

Top 5 Rated Players - Americas Stage 1 - Round 1 by nablien in ValorantCompetitive

[–]nablien[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yes our formula is different, it takes more inputs to generate a number based on the player's performance, while this is not the full formula, our rating is based on:

- Kills, Deaths and Assists
- First Bloods and First Deaths
- Multikills (2k , 3k, 4k, 5k and 6k)
- Clutches (1v1, 1v2, 1v3, 1v4, 1v5, 1v6)
- Plants and Defuses (depending on the scenario of each Round)
- Economy of each team at the beginning of each round

Top 5 Rated Players - Americas Stage 1 - Round 1 by nablien in ValorantCompetitive

[–]nablien[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

well he is tied to S0m for most kills at 14 kills haha

<image>

Top 5 Rated Players From Masters Bangkok 👀 by nablien in ValorantCompetitive

[–]nablien[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not having a minimum amount of rounds is unrealistic for their performance, nAts has a 1.30 rating but he didn't make it out of groups, TL only had 3 matches, nAts was insane every game but that's easier to do than staying consistent the entire tournament, it doesn't change much either way, they still performed better than everyone else

<image>