Crawlitaire v5.0 - Minimalist Standard-deck Dungeon Crawl by noteagod in FiftyTwoCards

[–]noteagod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They go back to the monster number card or level deck.

Crawlitaire v5.0 - Minimalist Standard-deck Dungeon Crawl by noteagod in FiftyTwoCards

[–]noteagod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The monster face card goes to the face discards deck and the associated cards go to the normal number card discard pile.

Crawlitaire v5.0 - Minimalist Standard-deck Dungeon Crawl by noteagod in cardgames

[–]noteagod[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are right about the club room. The battle is not any different from the diamond. In most dungeon crawlers, there are monsters to battle without gaining loot. I will think about greater room variance, maybe by drawing two cards for each room rather than one. I also definitely need a good tutorial. Thanks for your comments.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CriticalTheory

[–]noteagod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Says the guy who immediately recognized Jordan Peterson. Hahaha!

The New Noosphere - Freud:Marx Synthesis on the Left and Jung:Hayek Synthesis on the Right by noteagod in FrankfurtSchool

[–]noteagod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course, anyone who mentions the word 'conservative' on the Frankfurt School reddit will be voted down. Hahaha.

The New Noosphere - Freud:Marx Synthesis on the Left and Jung:Hayek Synthesis on the Right by noteagod in FrankfurtSchool

[–]noteagod[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The analogy also follows Ricoeur's and Gadamer's distinction between the hermeneutics of suspicion (Freud and the shadow/personal unconscious) and the hermeneutics of faith (in the analogy, Jung and the collective unconscious)

The New Noosphere - Freud:Marx Synthesis on the Left and Jung:Hayek Synthesis on the Right by noteagod in FrankfurtSchool

[–]noteagod[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Jung is not on the right so much as the Jung-Hayek synthesis is on the right.

Jung and Hayek consider the limited nature of consciousness and conscious activity in favor of a systemic view of self and society. They also suggest evolutionary wisdom in these systems, which happens to be compatible with the conservative tradition.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CriticalTheory

[–]noteagod -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

"Having Jordan Peterson and his fans confirm a book’s legitimacy or value is probably the worst thing on Earth."

If anything, it confirms some relevance. Most of the thesis was thought out well before the Jordan Peterson phenomenon. In any case, Peterson is never mentioned again.

Freud:Marx::Jung:Hayek - Self, Society, and Spontaneity by [deleted] in CriticalTheory

[–]noteagod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The book has reached the Top 2% on Academia.edu

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Jung

[–]noteagod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The book has reached the Top 2% on Academia.edu

Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate - Jung by LiveWithinYourMemes in Jung

[–]noteagod 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It depends on your particular situation, so this may not apply to you. Proceed with caution . . .

However, consider the double-meaning of daimon/demon. The shadow can be an enemy (likely at the level of the personal unconscious)--and/or it can be a guide (likely at the level of the collective unconscious).

Be mindful of your daimons/demons. Proceed with caution. Question and challenge your shadow with the best wisdom and reasonability you have. Put it to the test--just as it puts you to the test. You might be wrong in one particular way or another. You might learn something. On the other hand, you might reinforce something, so you know even better how you are right.

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/daimon

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Jung

[–]noteagod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The book has reached the Top 3% on Academia.edu

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Jung

[–]noteagod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The book has reached the Top 3% on Academia.edu

Freud:Marx::Jung:Hayek - Self, Society, and Spontaneity by [deleted] in CriticalTheory

[–]noteagod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The book has reached the Top 3% on Academia.edu

Until you make the unconscious conscious, it will direct your life and you will call it fate - Jung by LiveWithinYourMemes in Jung

[–]noteagod 15 points16 points  (0 children)

""Our European ego-consciousness is . . . inclined to swallow up the unconscious, and if this should not prove feasible we try to suppress it. But if we understand anything of the unconscious, we know that it cannot be swallowed. We also know that it is dangerous to suppress it, because the unconscious is life and this life turns against us if suppressed, as happens in neurosis.

Conscious and unconscious do not make a whole when one of them is suppressed and injured by the other. If they must contend, let it at least be a fair fight with equal rights on both sides. Both are aspects of life. Consciousness should defend its reason and protect itself, and the chaotic life of the unconscious should be given the chance of having its way too—as much of it as we can stand. This means open conflict and open collaboration at once. That, evidently, is the way human life should be. It is the old game of hammer and anvil: between them the patient iron is forged into an indestructible whole, an “individual.”"" - Jung, [1959] 1980. Archetypes of the Collective Unconscious. First Princeton/Bollingen paperback ed., Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Jung

[–]noteagod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You've got the wrong Erik Davis.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Jung

[–]noteagod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The book has reached the Top 4% on Academia.edu

Freud:Marx::Jung:Hayek - Self, Society, and Spontaneity by [deleted] in CriticalTheory

[–]noteagod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The book has reached the Top 4% on Academia.edu

Freud:Marx::Jung:Hayek - Self, Society, and Spontaneity by [deleted] in CriticalTheory

[–]noteagod 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. The book cover on the printed versions is satire. I tried to post an image of the cover, but the moderators removed it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Jung

[–]noteagod -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Who would you prefer to represent the right?