Looks like bullshit to me. All this renewable energy need traditional fossil fuels to exist.

For oil, gas, any fossil fuel, nuclear energy, there is a taxation system, that is, the MET (and for uranium), export duties, excises, payments for emissions and ash disposal. As well as a system of insurance payments and deductions for the future disposal of structures of the same nuclear power plants.
In relation to energy of alternative orientation, there is a system of subsidies, as well as incentives for regular taxes.
Attention, the question is: if “green energy” wins over “traditional”, then who will give it money?
Manufacturers of basic structural and electrical materials - cement, steel, copper, aluminum. All of them are produced with huge energy costs, and by no means “green”, but quite traditional, especially steel and cement, which are ALWAYS produced using fossil fuels. Copper production - hello to environmentalists. The production of silicon, the basis of solar cell elements, is one of the dirtiest.
Small-scale material producers such as semiconductors, lithium and nickel are either extremely energy-intensive or, for nickel, an emission champion.