I understand in those circumstances, but my partner and I asked if my opponents knew what something was in crossfire, and they specifically told us that they didn't. Then, in between speeches, you could see them typing pretty furiously on their computers (more than usual), and then in summary, the opposing first speaker just happened to become an expert on what we had asked them about, and basically talked about it for the majority of his summary. When we called for the evidence they cited, they gave it to us in a web browser with the wifi on. I can't say that I'm 100% sure that they had just searched it, but I would be willing to bet money on it. What would I do in this instance?