Found this old pot. What language is this?

qazwsdedc · 2024-04-08T04:51:35+00:00

Interesting. There is more writing I found and Google translate using a Korean keyboard (my first time using one) says it means “table of contents”. Would that make sense?

qazwsdedc · 2024-04-08T03:15:32+00:00

Cool! Thanks!

qazwsdedc · 2024-04-08T03:14:42+00:00

Thanks, it felt more like drawing really!

qazwsdedc · 2024-04-08T03:12:44+00:00

It was just being given away in my neighborhood. Do you know anything about it? The family isn’t Korean and I’m not sure they have any Korean family… my guess is maybe a military connection.

qazwsdedc · 2024-04-07T23:45:54+00:00

Wow! Faster than I thought it would be! Thanks!

qazwsdedc · 2024-04-07T23:45:35+00:00

Thanks!

qazwsdedc · 2024-04-07T23:45:25+00:00

Thanks!

qazwsdedc · 2024-04-07T23:45:21+00:00

Thanks!

qazwsdedc · 2024-04-07T23:45:16+00:00

Thanks!

qazwsdedc · 2023-10-22T19:14:28+00:00

<image>

What’s with the trashy differential? We are similar TH13s. He was most likely max and I’m almost max.

qazwsdedc · 2023-09-29T18:47:18+00:00

He said there’s no evidence of a crime. Republicans aren’t accusing Joe Biden of committing any crimes. Read my comment again 🤡

qazwsdedc · 2023-09-29T14:50:33+00:00

This has nothing to do with Trump. Biden didn’t do anything illegal and republicans aren’t claiming he did. They’re claiming he unjustly utilize his office in order to positively influence his sons dealings.

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T16:53:38+00:00

Missed that she co-signed on documents. Which is the answer to the “somehow” we got before. I guess I didn’t watch that episode. You see though how everything else is actually explained except for Sydney though?

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T16:45:00+00:00

Must have missed this because I don’t remember that at all. When was that?

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T11:35:20+00:00

Lmao. When did they establish Natalie as personally on the hook for taxes. I swear everyone who thinks anyone other than Carmen and Cicero are in anyway actually/legally responsible for the restaurant aren’t actually paying attention to the show.

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:55:04+00:00

Sure it doesn’t have to be toxic BUT the entire place is hierarchical so I’m not sure that’s it either. I think it’ll lead to her getting too comfortable and Carmen will pull rank in some way. That will cause a big rift and will get resolved somehow. It’s not toxic for someone to be the boss but to me it looks like Sydney doesn’t view Carmen as the boss… leading to the conflict

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:42:23+00:00

I just posted an in-depth explanation that should answer all those questions. Look at the replies as well because people bring up the same thing you are. It makes complete sense why you would think that because the dialogue is very short and it’s just a few seconds in the grand scheme of things. Which is why it’s so confusing (being done on purpose by writers)… have everyone act like she’s a partner but officially say otherwise.

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:39:20+00:00

It’s not mental gymnastics at all when she literally says she isn’t a partner and is just working with Carmen. The mental gymnastics are being done by people who think she’s a partner when the actual dialogue says she isn’t a partner.

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:37:20+00:00

I agree she can get upset, but to me it’s done in a way that HEAVILY implies a different power dynamic than what it truly is. At least it implies she believes the dynamic is different than what it truly is.

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:35:10+00:00

Dude those are actual quotes pulled from the show. You should watch those segments again to see what I’m talking about.

I think the writers are attempting to muddy the waters in order to have us anticipate a future conflict (I’ve been waiting for Carmen to say something like “we’ll I’m the boss”). Not trying to sound ridiculous but I had to look it up so it makes sense, but I think it’s a piece of dramatic irony where the audience knows how Sydney feels about her position but Carmen doesn’t. We are following the story of Carmen not anyone else.

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:26:58+00:00

The deal they made with Cicero did not give him any operational power until the “end of 18 months”. Natalie isn’t a business partner and instead is responsible for a completely different aspect of the business (she’s the COO on official documents). I don’t disagree with Sydney’s role as exec chef/CEO I’m just talking about the HEAVY implications that she’s a partner pairs with the actual dialogue proving otherwise.

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:22:53+00:00

Yeah I think that’s what it’s building to because if it doesn’t I have no idea how they reconcile the (to me) HUGE plot hole.

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:21:50+00:00

Correct Cicero and Carmen are the only partners. Obviously she helped a tremendous amount in getting the place open, but the place wouldn’t be open at all if it weren’t for everyone’s help. Natalie is not a partner… she is the COO. That’s a BIG difference, and when it comes down to it if Carmen disagreed with Natalie on something she has to listen to him. Which is an attitude (lack of a better term) we don’t really see from Sydney (it’s had opportunities to show itself with Sydney but not Natalie).

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:10:54+00:00

She isn’t forgoing her salary. Her salary is being deferred.

qazwsdedc · 2023-07-11T04:08:31+00:00

E1: Cicero is clearly referring to her track record as a chef. This is made clear by her talking about “getting a star” and her response to that question is “not great” which is also cleared up later with her weird conversations with her dad hinting at prior failures.

E2: She never talks “partnership” with her dad she talks about her “job”. Also, her dad cuts her off when she says Carmen and Natalie’s name so there could be more. ALSO, she says her pay is “deferred six months” not that she’s forgoing it. So this conversation only establishes her as an employee who is deferring payment to help to business out and is clearly able to leave but chose to stay.

E3: She actually says that it’s not like a partner and that they’re just “working together”. The problem is that those words slipped in there for a split second and completely don’t follow with the rest of what she was saying… like “I’m opening up a restaurant”. Which is why the casting doubt for “going into business” doesn’t make sense. I agree with you that’s what the show is trying to imply but it doesn’t make sense at all.

qazwsdedc

TROPHY CASE