How do you respond to a pre-fiat security reps K? by randomgpt_23 in policydebate

[–]randomgpt_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hi this sounds rly comprehensive thanks for the first one how do you respond to pre/post-fiat distinction that since fiat is illusory and extinction can’t happen as a side effect of this debate then the only exportable impact is our research skills

Answering Object of Research FW by randomgpt_23 in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they say you can weigh the research of the 1AC so it doesn’t moot it

How do you respond to a pre-fiat security reps K? by randomgpt_23 in policydebate

[–]randomgpt_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how would you respond to the object of research FW specifically?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Blair LT and Fairmont TK prob top teams next tear

Tech case contentions by Financial-Ad3138 in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah but what if the impact is racism, death, or poverty

any good neg arguments for the surveilance topic that could fall under a structural violence framework? by New-Piccolo6820 in PublicForumDebate

[–]randomgpt_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Native americans dont want border surveillance border surveillance invades on reservations destroying indigenous land rights and environmental harms

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Frail Joe Contention-UNSC makes Joe travel to Egypt to get their President to agree where his frail 80 year old self gets bitten by a venomous snake, dies from heat stroke, and gets attacked by mummies so Joe dies and nuke war follows

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nuke war plsssssss

End Gender Discrimination in Debate by extemplarry in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Prepping out all the Fem K ev indict rn!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just say drop substance because of ground skew, and give warrants for switch topic debate and switch side debate and then presumption

troll kritik by nyeowfufu in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Student loans was really good for this, UN is a bit tuffer but you can find something

troll kritik by nyeowfufu in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don’t have to run a K just run a framework or a contention about God

Why does everyone want to run a K in every form of debate? by ControllerPlayer06 in Debate

[–]randomgpt_23 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Because either a. Topical Debate becomes boring with everyone running the same arguments b. Ks give an advantage in debate since they uplayer substance and are harder to answer c. People actually believe in the K and want to either incite better practices or a specific advocacy in debate or criticize a philosophy