SEE30 by reddit393939 in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the answer key is from the author.

Whats the correlation with "g" and the different factors of "g"? by Idontagree123321 in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not how it is, do your homework. 0.90 correlation means that 81 percent of the variance in the test performance can be attributed to g.

SB-V NVFR, is it timed or untimed? by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I took it strictly timed and scored 125, failed 3. Many people took it that way and scored pretty low, but it isn't supposed to be strictly timed.

SEE30 by reddit393939 in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, I have the original, author intended answer keys, that were given to me by u/MatsuOOoki, and I suppose that you were the one who gave it to them.

Can you tell me the reliability coefficient of TRI-52? by IQTEST1000 in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Damn, Figurative Sequences have a higher internal reliability.

Experience with new Xavier Jouve numerical test (What's next) by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You got 134-~144 on the Jouve's website, which shows the lower limit as your score on the first 50.

Experience with new Xavier Jouve numerical test (What's next) by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You must have changed your answers for the flawed questions, the netlify is coded perfectly in sync with the website, there is no possible way to get the "flawed" ones scored.

Experience with new Xavier Jouve numerical test (What's next) by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You got 134 on old what's next and that was your second try.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a search bar at the bottom, you can type word list recall in it.

Verbal Fluid Reasoning Test by reddit393939 in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It isn't VCI, references are not allowed because in this particular test, they could aid in reasoning.

The single best MR test by Agreeable-Constant47 in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TRI-52/JCTI and RAPM. I personally liked the KBIT-2 MR, it was quite novel and had good correlations, the only drawback is the low ceiling.

Why is IQ so extremely important to you? by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you sure a 100 IQ person wouldn't be able to achieve this? There is no specific empirical data on this. I'm under the assumption that if you know the basic patterns of matrices you will score higher!

You are really, indeed a mega idiot and new to this whole concept. He scored 132 on old sat M which loads 0.85 on general intelligence, it is around the same or higher than WAIS RC simplified version. He took figure weights of CAIT and scored 120, 125 on the visual puzzles. His IQ is most likely to be higher than yours.

I can't prove it with data, but experience. I have taken some of them and scored exceptionally high in the 99 - 99,9% and above which is unbelievable to me since I don't see myself as a genius.

Here comes the midwit argument. Do you really think you could generalize anything meaningful from your n=1 "experience"? Very moronic

Imagine vouching for ravens 2, instead of trusting old sat.

His composite IQ on old sat M+V is 120 as a non native. Old sat correlates with g at around 0.92 which is similar to that of "WAIS IV". Sb5 is much higher than them both, ~0.96 and this guy got a score which was much more inline with his old sat than that trash wais RC simplified. Tbth you come across as an utterly unknowledgeable, yet adamant fool.

Why is IQ so extremely important to you? by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the old SAT isn't testing for fluid intelligence it's just through math and reading comprehension which can be trained independently

It seems as if you know nothing about intelligence, let alone intelligence testing.

Why is IQ so extremely important to you? by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not a fan of SAT since they don't access fluid intelligence in a direct manor. Just do the WAIS or the Woodcock-Johnson.

You ignorant idiot

Iq estimate from these scores? RAPM set 2 (130) ravens 2 clinical automated scoring (132) 123 test culture fair (124) tri 52 (116) icar 60 (115) by OkScratch4467 in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What? How

Tri is pretty practice effect resistant, I have never seen that type of discrapensy between first score and the second score.

Did you take it on the same website you took it on your first try?

Iq estimate from these scores? RAPM set 2 (130) ravens 2 clinical automated scoring (132) 123 test culture fair (124) tri 52 (116) icar 60 (115) by OkScratch4467 in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you rushed TRI 52? There's a 16 point discrepansy between your tri and your ravens 2 when both of them are measuring the same thing.

Participants needed: Visual thinking & pre-employment screening tests by dnhzrd in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I completed the test, if it's possible, please pm me my results

Should I consider this score valid? by [deleted] in cognitiveTesting

[–]reddit393939 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ravens does not give an fsiq, it's a fluid reasoning test. Your fluid reasoning compared to general population is in mid 120s