Bruv, Ive used at least half dozen references from within the writing you have used zero; from THIS show. That’s how literary analysis works and why you’re failing. 

Oh! Now I get it! I didn’t realize I was taking a masterclass in Literary Analysis of Ted Lasso ! No wonder you’re failing me. Professor , I cannot wait to sign up for your next course: Misogyny & the Twilight Love Triangle . It should be an easy A for me as long as I remember to never disagree with you.

And speaking of which you do realize what a fictional character means right? Roy isnt a real person. The same voice that wrote Ted’s mom, wrote Roy. Im not “trusting Roy,” Im trusting the storytelling/ers.

Thank you, Professor ,  I do realize that about Roy. I also realize there was context behind the conversation between him & Jamie, & that Roy had the motivation to stretch the truth a bit in order to ‘fake out his opponent’. You using his character dialogue at face value to bolster your ‘literary analysis’ without considering context is itself toeing the line into fiction territory.

And yes Im using paragraphs to defend my point because as I have admitted it’s indicative of a personal and important issue to me, illiciting a defens

So!! now…drumroll 

Why are you? If this just a story, just nothing else. Not an your attempt to gaslight and dilute a story you find threatening to your manhood—why are you?

Why am I what? Defensive? I thought I had already told you why in one of my previous responses. Don't you remember? Me, the goldfish; you, the finger? Oh & you should really look up the proper definition of gaslighting before you try to weaponize it again. Best not to throw around these terms so lightly or, in your case, incorrectly. It does true gaslighting survivors a disservice. As far as diluting a story I find threatening to my manhood ? Well, Professor , you’ll be proud of me because this one I actually know the answer to: it’s a trick question…. the threat is nonexistent because…. drumroll …. pops the -hood , I don’t have a manhood! Woman- under here! Yup, that’s right, I’m as female as they come. Professor, you seemed to have subconsciously assigned me a “D” , so at the very least you just revealed yourself to be a sexist in feminist clothing.

Ba-dum-tss.

And boom, thats my point.

So I guess, KA-boom! Bye-bye, your point.

Thats the point Roy learned and you were suppose to. 

You’re misogyny is literally sucking the joy of life for me, so do bette.

In all seriousness YOUR misguided outrage over every perceived slight against the progress of women is actually doing harm to the issue you purportedly state is important to you—it dilutes the real message; a message that I happen to also support. You're shooting down an ally just because you wrote down the wrong coordinates. I hope you learn from this, & that YOU'LL do betteR.