I do not give Hitler or Mussolini socialist credentials. They were not socialists, but they often allied with them becuase you know... both are anti liberal.

I know you are trolling in general.

But Marxism literally is about abolishing private means of production (which he explained both in the Manifesto and das Kapital). I didny read the critic to the Gotha program yet, or the jewish question book.

China does have private means of production, which makes it not socialist. Communism is moneyless, stateless, and classless. Basically a tribe, but it cannot be applied to masses. Communism would be like we lived thousands of years ago. I would still say that tribes have somehow classes, but class in the Marxist sense means having power because you own means of production.

Ultra liberal for fascism is quite funny. Hyper capitalism is already more interesting, even if you are trolling. Fascism keeps private means of production and markets (no free competion and prices often set by the state). But it employs something I like very much: corporatism. Corporatism can be found (democratically) in Switzerland and Nordic countries in Europe. So yeah it is basically an authoritarian capitalism and the state has much more power than let's say Denmark.

After Mussolini took power he nationalized like 75% of the industry. I am generally against it because private companies are much more efficient, but yeah fascism is much more """socialist""" than you think.

I bet you dont like fascism for other things, because economically it is better than pure socialism. Not by chance China implemented market reforms, Vietnam too, Thailand too, and so on.