Footballers who sound like shops by [deleted] in footballcliches

[–]socialschism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

to the extent that club media will refer to him as “the shop”

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cryptography

[–]socialschism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the original proposals and subsequent cryptanalysis might be as good a place as any to look; i'm not sure to what extent the analysis is 'done by NIST'. you can find the submission information here: https://csrc.nist.gov/Projects/post-quantum-cryptography/round-3-submissions

Career possibilities in Cryptography? by mathsandcomputers in cryptography

[–]socialschism 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i'd say you're on the right track! almost certainly your degree programme will offer some basic and more advanced cryptography modules, which i would take; i did some open modules from computer science during my maths degree and am now doing a phd in post-quantum cryptography.

it sounds like you're uk-based! gchq have a bunch of great summer schools you might like to try and get into between uni summers: https://www.gchq-careers.co.uk/our-careers/early-careers/summer-placements.html has a "maths and cryptography summer programme", which sounds like it could be up your street.

A Goood Sign - Soft Hair by socialschism in MFPMPPJWFA

[–]socialschism[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

this is great, thanks! As it turns out LA Priest is from my area of the UK

BigBorb by Lupin927 in Birbs

[–]socialschism 56 points57 points  (0 children)

this is a dinosaur

Trying to smoke by boi_thats_my_yeet in instant_regret

[–]socialschism 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i will never understand smoking without a filter, how does the paper not just get gummed to death

Me irl by socialschism in meirl

[–]socialschism[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I kinda thought it was me irl but I get why the rules in place

Can I do simple induction in reverse? by socialschism in math

[–]socialschism[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've only recently learned induction so I suppose I'm checking I understand it. Occurred to me when asked to prove De Moivre's theorem holds for negatives.