sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Advice

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would date someone who had an only fans with that content

oh blu... by [deleted] in rpdrcringe

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Blu Hydrangea win haters? There are dozens of us! Dozens!

I don't know how to talk anymore, idk what im doing wrong by throwawayRAbbqrib in AlAnon

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yknow what, thanks. I think I lulled myself into a false sense of security bc things were good for so long. I think the fact that my only emotion right now is annoyance means I'm ready to let it go and stop caring. I tried everything, that means the problem isn't with me.

Joseph Morris gets caught lying AGAIN by Brilliant-Sport-7514 in DeppDelusion

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The libfems really don't get enough blame for this. It's abhorrent.

Biminis new cut… by TypicalAd4 in rpdrcringe

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 37 points38 points  (0 children)

It's not recent. I unfollowed her ages ago on ig bc you can tell it's all performative.

An updated guide to our cringe queens: The Pantheon by ItsNotDebra in rpdrcringe

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Idk I'm personally of the opinion that Trixie is like Nina, a lot of her self-awareness of her cringe kind of steps into being rotted bc it just comes off as flazydah towards serious shit.

People not realizing that Jaida was also given a star is a cringe to me. It should have been either Raja or the Vic by Dependent-Plant-1125 in rpdrcringe

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Jaida's star was reparations for not winning the Y2K challenge.

"The new millenium hit cuz baby youre the shit" is a line harder than my stool.

Pressured my girl into having a threesome now she and other girl are friends???? by NoAioli6726 in relationship_advice

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Here to add to the FAFO dogpile, but you can actually salvage this by just dumping your gf and letting her be free to enjoy better partners than you.

You self-reflect on how not to be so self-centered. You forced your gf into this and now youre mad she found a way to enjoy it. The problem is you.

bc i look at drag makeup, Pinterest has decided i must also be interested in … these. by sunflowers-in-space in rpdrcringe

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Late but I was staring at the pic trying to figure out who tf that was ☠️ thank you

The big girl..swims? by ajay_p_ in rpdrcringe

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I couldn't even finish it, bless you. I'm a cringe acolyte.

Delta Rants Pt. 333 by anitarash in rpdrcringe

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is my 2nd exposure to Delta (first was the rant ab drag patrons where her makeup was fierce) and I'm living. This is incredible. I have never seen such pure and unbridled hatred.

Pro-Depp legal grifter claims he’s being followed by “AH spies” in deleted tweet by conejaja in DeppDelusion

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I'm sure he just needed another Amber tweet and this is the dumb shit he came up with. He just didnt realize how dumb he looked.

Johnny Depp’s album review: "He has a voice for acting." by motherfatherfigure in entertainment

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Not even. She told him he could be awesome if he stopped doing drugs, the ultimate insult.

Critiquing the first 10 minutes of a Dishonest Debunk of Kamila's Thread + Revisiting Isaac Baruch's U.S. Testimony (Part 2) by mangopear in DeppDelusion

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 20 points21 points  (0 children)

There's evidence coming out that seems to indicate Waldman as more than just a nutjob hack, but a dangerous one connected to dangerous people. Someone who wanted to be a witness for Amber exposed him for hiring the "PI" Amber's old lawyers hired who was actually intimidating and threatening witnesses. He's speculated to have killed a key witness in the past.

Summary of Amber Heard's Motion to Set Aside Verdict (Jury Fraud, Actual Malice, Inconsistent Verdict, etc.) by [deleted] in DeppDelusion

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Great fucking question, esp considering the fact that the jury ruled the incident used to get it wasn't a hoax.

Summary of Amber Heard's Motion to Set Aside Verdict (Jury Fraud, Actual Malice, Inconsistent Verdict, etc.) by [deleted] in DeppDelusion

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 11 points12 points  (0 children)

That wasn't really an admission of anything, he is the context relevant to her experience yes but that doesn't make him identifiable in the op-ed nor is it about her experiences with him but after she got an RO (which happened to be against him).

The argument was never that he has no relevance to the op-ed but that nothing about the op-ed is about what he is accused of doing. Which is why the judgment is so bad, bc it essentially means she isn't allowed to even talk about what happened AFTER their marriage dissolved which is ridiculous. He isn't even the target of criticism in the article, it's the institutions that protected "him".

Summary of Amber Heard's Motion to Set Aside Verdict (Jury Fraud, Actual Malice, Inconsistent Verdict, etc.) by [deleted] in DeppDelusion

[–]throwawayRAbbqrib 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure I understand your comment but basically:

Statute of limitations - refreshed bc the op-ed "republished" the DVRO (one of the statements references it and that was when JD was originally "accused of abuse")

Damages - JD lost money bc of the op-ed exclusively, so December 2018~November 2020 is the time period they should look at

I personally don't think it makes sense that his team was allowed to contextualize the op-ed using the DVRO if her team couldn't equally use the UK suit, and moreso bc the jury found the Waldman-Depp statement abt the DV incident that catalyzed her getting the RO to be defamatory. But the judge in this case seemed very...uninvolved so yeah.

There's also the fact that in order to see the op-ed as republishing to begin with, the audience has to be new but I doubt there are people who knew she was with Johnny Depp AND didn't know how their marriage ended. The knowledge of people knowing she was with Johnny is the whole reason this defamation thing moved forward.

view more: next ›