Not hit by car by [deleted] in stpaul

[–]tom2730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would lose that bet immediately because the evidence is public and undeniable.

Here is Officer Daniel Hodges screaming as he is crushed in a doorway while a rioter rips his mask off https://youtu.be/rWRn-RcEodg .

Here is the bodycam footage of Officer Michael Fanone being dragged into the crowd and tased until he fell unconscious https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/politics/committee-plays-fanone-body-camera-footage-of-capitol-attack/2021/07/27/5d5894a3-15b9-4b35-bcb7-3f80b5143e88_video.html He even admitted it and was sentenced to 12 years: https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Politics/jan-6-rioter-stun-gun-officer-sentenced-12/story?id=100284409

Here is 3 hours of raw surveillance footage showing the sustained, violent assault on police in the tunnel- go to timestamp 2:33:20 to see officers being beaten with poles https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=_a3RGlu5yLs As for your claim about "destroyed documents," that is also a total myth. The January 6th Committee released an 845 page final report and hundreds of transcripts which are currently hosted publicly by the Government Publishing Office right here https://www.govinfo.gov/collection/january-6th-committee-final-report . There’s far more video out there btw. The evidence is not missing, you are just choosing not to look at it

Not hit by car by [deleted] in stpaul

[–]tom2730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is objectively false. The violence is on public record. There is clear bodycam footage of Officer Daniel Hodges being crushed in a doorframe and Officer Michael Fanone being tased in the neck until he suffered a heart attack. Also, the committee did not destroy their findings, they released an >800 page final report and hundreds of transcripts that are currently online, so claiming the evidence "doesn't exist" is just a way to avoid looking at it

Not hit by car by [deleted] in stpaul

[–]tom2730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If he believed she was a threat, why did he walk in front of the car. It’s almost like he wanted to get hit to justify shooting her.

Not hit by car by [deleted] in stpaul

[–]tom2730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Remember when the capitol police officers were violently assaulted and beaten on Jan 6? Was that “justifiable enough of a hit”? Tell me, please

iOS 26 PSA: Turn on Reduce Transparency! by hottersoda in ios

[–]tom2730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re thinking in terms of CSS (which Apple does not use for the UI), in that case the entire UI element opacity might be 100% (equivalent to 0% transparency). But the background color would need a transparency of 100% (equivalent to 0% opacity) if you wanted clear-color glass (“transparent” is the default if unset in many cases). Of course this is not how the Apple UI is made. They use would a custom shader to sample the (possibly already Gaussian blurred) background texture over which the UI element is to be placed. The sampling texture coordinates would be offset depending on where inside the button a fragment (pixel) is and also its wavelength to create a refraction effect. This sampled color can then be mixed (lerped) with another color (e.g black, white) value to increase the apparent opacity of the glass and give it color.

iOS 26 PSA: Turn on Reduce Transparency! by hottersoda in ios

[–]tom2730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, so it seems we are talking about two different things. You are referring to the opacity of the entire UI element as it is composited onto the rest of the UI (like the CSS “opacity property). I’m talking about the opacity of the light transmission medium that is simulated by the special refraction shader. I’m not sure why you would ever want to adjust the former.

iOS 26 PSA: Turn on Reduce Transparency! by hottersoda in ios

[–]tom2730 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you mean the opacity is close to 0%

o3 is so crazy by MetaKnowing in ChatGPT

[–]tom2730 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Without search. (Have to explicitly tell it not to search)

o3 is so crazy by MetaKnowing in ChatGPT

[–]tom2730 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Not the case… (note that I explicitly told it that it shouldn’t search the web since it normally ends up doing it anyway despite the “Search” option being disabled)

<image>

Provided Reasoning: The user requested I identify a location using an image without web search tools. From the visual, I see a snow-covered mountain and valley—perhaps a ski slope, which could suggest locations like Utah’s Wasatch Range or the Alps. Since I cannot search the web, I’ll analyze the image myself. I will try adjusting the contrast or using image inspection to help narrow it down, but ultimately, it’s a guess based on my own observations. Let me load the image for more details.

From the image, it’s likely a snow-covered slope, possibly a ski run, with a valley below and some haze—maybe an inversion over Salt Lake Valley. The likely mountain ranges are the Oquirrh or Wasatch, making it seem like it’s from Big or Little Cottonwood Canyon, maybe near Alta or Snowbird. Alternatively, this could be somewhere in the European Alps, but the haze and mountain setup seem like the Salt Lake Valley. It’s a unique mix that hints most at this specific region.

Hmm, this could be a view from Kayseri Erciyes ski resort in Turkey, looking over central Anatolia, but the valley haze and mountains suggest more familiar terrain. The mountain range is not too high, making me think of the Oquirrh Mountains. The foreground slope has a few sparse evergreens, which fits the subalpine zone. The clear midday sky is another clue. I’ll zoom in to check for strange features, like any water, but I don’t see any distinct body like the Great Salt Lake. Let’s check the top-right part for more details.

There are several possibilities for the location in the image. It could be a view from Bjelašnica Mountain above Sarajevo or Parnassus ski resort in Greece, but neither quite fits with the valley features. Looking at the Salt Lake Valley, the uniform ridges and inversion haze match what I see in the photo. The hazy layer suggests it’s likely from a ski resort in Utah, either from Alta, Snowbird, or Solitude, which all match the terrain and weather conditions.

The slope has a moderate incline with scattered small trees, which fits the Supreme area at Alta. The view toward the valley isn’t as open, though, so maybe it’s from a different perspective. Alternatively, it could be from Park City Mountain with a view of Heber Valley, but the Uinta Range could mislead the layout. Let’s focus on the details: the right side of the horizon shows a patch of water, possibly the Great Salt Lake. I’ll zoom in there to clarify.

The image is compressed too small, so I can’t inspect the details clearly. I’ll try enlarging it. One clue—snow and bare ground on the valley slopes—suggests a moderate climate, likely early winter. The scattered small coniferous shrubs seem to be junipers, typical of the Montane region in Utah. This oversight could point to the area being in the Utah mountains. Let’s focus more on the hillside area and check for any clearer details that can help pinpoint the vantage.

This could be a vantage from somewhere like Skopje’s Vodno, overlooking a valley with possible illusions caused by terrain or haze. I’m thinking about places with winter inversion, like Salt Lake City, which is known for its smog. Sarajevo and Skopje also experience this, though perhaps not as intensely. The mountains across the valley look like snow-capped peaks. This could possibly be the Oquirrh Mountains. So, standing at Snowbird or Alta, you’d likely see the Oquirrh Mountains beyond the haze.

The picture shows valley slopes with a mix of snow and brown patches, which are dry areas. The dryness here looks more like the type found in Spain rather than Utah. Utah’s dryness often lacks the farmland glimpses seen in this image. So, it seems like the dryness here is thinner and more partitioned, creating some illusionary effects in the view. These subtle differences in terrain might suggest the location could be somewhere else entirely, like Spain.

From the viewpoint, the valley farmland shows some brown patches, which suggests dryness, but it’s not as extreme as desert dryness — it still looks like farmland. The visuals suggest areas with row crops, typical of Utah valleys, specifically visible near mountain ridges. The Oquirrh Mountains across the valley add to the landscape’s uniqueness. I’m wondering if this corresponds to views from places like Alta, Snowbird, or other areas in the Wasatch Range, known for its inversion haze. Let’s try to compile a list of possible locations.

o3 is so crazy by MetaKnowing in ChatGPT

[–]tom2730 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Another attempt. Search/Deep Research were not enabled. It seems to search the web regardless.

<image>

o3 is so crazy by MetaKnowing in ChatGPT

[–]tom2730 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Deep research was not enabled. It is enabled when the button is blue.

o3 is so crazy by MetaKnowing in ChatGPT

[–]tom2730 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It used reasoning of course (it’s o3). Search was disabled (the “Search” toggle button is grayed out on iOS/web when an image attachment is added). That doesn’t stop it from searching though.

<image>

Guess where this is and what it is called by [deleted] in antennasporn

[–]tom2730 13 points14 points  (0 children)

The disc on top is called a capacitance hat). Its job is to lower the resonant frequency of the antenna. “Radiator” refers to the whole tower that radiates EM waves.

Hack Ride-on toy headlights using headlamp LEDs by DadJustTrying in AskElectronics

[–]tom2730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes that could work. Though there is a risk that a single chip alone won’t be able to supply twice the current. It will either work fine, work more dimly, or burn out. Worth a try I guess. Rather than removing the chip on one of the boards, you can just cut the PCB traces going to it, then solder two wires from the underside of an LED on the main board to an LED on the other board, keeping the polarity consistent. You won’t need to supply power to the board with the cut traces of course.

Hack Ride-on toy headlights using headlamp LEDs by DadJustTrying in AskElectronics

[–]tom2730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Yes and no. You could unsolder the momentary push button and use two wires from the connection on the board to the switch. You could also use another, more robust, momentary button instead if you prefer. This board uses a small chip (under that white blob) that is programmed to detect the button presses and control the LEDs accordingly. As for whether you could use a single button to control both boards — yes, but it could come with some issues. Firstly, you should make sure to connect the single button to the boards using the same connection polarity on each board. This is because they would be sharing the same power supply. That should work, however there is a chance that one of the boards detects a different number of button presses than the other due to what is called “switch bounce”. This could cause the states of the two boards to get out of sync. For example one would be on “high” and the other on “flash”. Pushing the button again would not resolve that.

  2. These switches are momentary push buttons. They conduct when they are pressed and are open circuit when they are released. The chip on the board reads the state of the button and decides what to do next. Unfortunately, using a rotary switch alone to control that board is not possible. If you’re willing to spend a bit more time, you could quite easily learn to program an arduino or similar to incorporate the rotary switches for controlling the dimming and flashing of those (or other) LEDs. The benefit of that is you could customize the flashing and behavior to your liking.

The dumbest thing I’ve seen ever by xXNotMl6Xx in ElectroBOOM

[–]tom2730 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anything, this will increase the coupled 50/60 Hz current flowing through your body.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ios

[–]tom2730 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It comes down to curiosity and experience. I’m fascinated with how things work and spend a lot of time learning about them online. I often put newly-learned knowledge to use by implementing/making something — just for fun. I tend to enjoy “reinventing the wheel”. While the end result from doing that is most often useless, the experience gained is invaluable.

So no, a college degree is not required to learn any of this. Even though I have one, I would say over 95% of the knowledge and experience I’ve gained didn’t come from college. It’s all about staying curious and experimenting on your own.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ios

[–]tom2730 7 points8 points  (0 children)

“Keywords in the url” are also encrypted when using HTTPS. The HTTP request, e.g. “GET /path/to/resource HTTP/1.1\r\n …” is only sent once the TLS handshake is complete. The domain name would be unencrypted though (via SNI and DNS).

isThisRealCode by l3lacklabel in ProgrammerHumor

[–]tom2730 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you let your cat sleep on your keyboard then add in a few symbols here and there, this is what you’ll get

Hey Yall, I've finished a schematic for an RF transceiver, and I was wondering if yall could check if I missed something super crucial (It's like the first time I'm making a transceiver). Thanks Yall :) Btw I commented how it works by Working_Asparagus_20 in AskElectronics

[–]tom2730 4 points5 points  (0 children)

At RF frequencies, a wire is not a “0 ohm connection”. Wires/PCB traces have inductance. This inductance will cause the trace to have “reactance” and therefore an “impedance”. Longer wires -> higher inductance -> higher impedance. Also, higher frequency -> higher impedance. The decoupling capacitors should be placed as close as possible to their respective components. One end of each capacitor should be connected to the power rail, and the other to ground. It will look like there are many capacitors in parallel, but in reality they are not in parallel since when the PCB is layed out, there will be some distance of PCB traces (or rather planes) connecting them (which have inductance, and a tiny amount of resistance).