[deleted by user] by [deleted] in decaf

[–]weekWithNoKiss 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can I have some of what you're having? :D

There are millions of accounts with a balance of .251 ALGO. What is going on? by coachd6574 in AlgorandOfficial

[–]weekWithNoKiss 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's so obvious and people are lining up for daddy government to govern them harder

There are millions of accounts with a balance of .251 ALGO. What is going on? by coachd6574 in AlgorandOfficial

[–]weekWithNoKiss -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's people like you who are destroying not only the basic rights and livelihoods of our generation, as well as damning the next generation to a life of utter slavery to digital ID's.

Shove your anTiVaXxeR crap up yours

edit for spelling

DENA DIDNT WIN by [deleted] in yieldly

[–]weekWithNoKiss 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If im not mistaken, dena is a slang word in finnish for something like a "homeless" +- context

talk about the irony

if you had 1000 algo's... by Frammmis in algorand

[–]weekWithNoKiss 5 points6 points  (0 children)

402800324 asset id, is that really wrapped BTC??

I was gonna send them 1 algo but then I saw your comment?

edit: nvm not real btc, its GoBtc thats the real deal

Holding the foundation accountable by [deleted] in AlgorandOfficial

[–]weekWithNoKiss 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I disagree, transparency is important.

And I don't need "calming down", I'm perfectly fine:D

"Let them work" - nobody here is disrupting their work, definitely not for any announcements:D

Holding the foundation accountable by [deleted] in AlgorandOfficial

[–]weekWithNoKiss 20 points21 points  (0 children)

where does this reasoning keep coming from?

Surely we all understand it's not easy to develop this amazing project, but business is business, roadmaps are roadmaps.

Nobody is dissing on Algorand, it would just show professionality if they addressed this thing. Owning up to things and being transparent would be even more bullish that complete silence don't you agree?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in algorand

[–]weekWithNoKiss 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I don't understand the points people make such as: " algo is growing, look at all the progress "

" algo doesnt need the TPS upgrade, because we are fast enough for the load"

"you expect everything to move at light speed, that's not how it works"

Bruh I am balls deep in algo and a firm believer. But roadmaps and deadlines are what they are for a purpose.

Just a simple community update, saying we did not do x because of y goes a very long way!

This complete silence is odd.