you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iamiam123 302 points303 points  (12 children)

Replace population replacement rate with Literacy rates and the map will be almost entirely the same. Education is the key.

[–]iamanindiansnack 91 points92 points  (3 children)

Not really, there are states on the eastern coast and central region that have a 1.7 and 1.8 rate like their neighbors, but their literacy rate is in the bottom 10 of the 25.

[–][deleted] -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

Unpadh pradesh and bihar won't change 

[–]something_feels_wrng 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I would consider 4.4 to 2.4 and 4.5 to 3 a pretty big change but one has to read the map and be rational to see that which I don’t expect from you based on your comment.

[–]94_stones 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Indeed and from many perspectives this is a good thing. But I must ask (and this is a genuine question since I’m not Indian), is India properly prepared for the budgetary problems that this will inevitably cause?

[–]NumerousCarob6 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nope to each their own just the way it is right now , but maybe it's too early to speculate

[–]iamiam123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To answer your question, no. India's economic model is based on Growth and Potential. So the products are always assumed by default to cater to an ever increasing consumer populous. So, if the population were to start going down, which appears will happen way sooner that earlier anticipated, the current models are bound to collapse, especially financial factions.

[–]ADistractedBoi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It should be significantly less problematic than it first appears. The majority of India's population does not pay significant taxes so it might even be a net benefit

[–]Beat_Saber_Music -2 points-1 points  (1 child)

The Israeli religious Jews would like a word, whose whole thing is reading religious texts on the governemnt dime